fomc minutes · November 11, 1957

FOMC Minutes

A meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee was held

in the offices of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

System in Washington on Tuesday, November 12, 1957, at 10:00 a.m.

PRESENT:

Mr.

Mr.

Mr.

Mr.

Martin, Chairman

Hayes, Vice Chairman

Allen

Balderston

Mr.

Mr.

Mr.

Mr.

Bryan

Leedy

Robertson

Shepardson

Mr. Szymczak

Mr. Williams

Messrs. Fulton, Irons, Leach, and Mangels,

Alternate Members of the Federal Open

Market Committee

Messrs. Erickson, Johns, and Deming, Presi

dents of the Federal Reserve Banks of

Boston, St. Louis, and Minneapolis,

respectively

Mr. Riefler, Secretary

Mr. Thurston, Assistant Secretary

Mr. Sherman, Assistant Secretary

Mr. Solomon, Assistant General Counsel

Mr. Thomas, Economist

Messrs. Atkinson, Bopp, Roelse, Tow and

Young, Associate Economists

Mr. Rouse, Manager, System Open Market

Account

Mr. Carpenter, Secretary, Board of Governors

Mr. Koch, Assistant Director, Division of Re

search and Statistics, Board of Governors

Mr. Gaines, Manager, Securities Department,

Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Messrs. Hostetler, Storrs, and Wheeler, Vice

Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks

of Cleveland, Richmond, and San Francisco,

respectively; Mr. Holland, Assistant Vice

President, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago;

Mr. Parsons, Director of Research, Federal

11/12/57

-2

Reserve Bank of Minneapolis; Messrs.

Willis and Walker, Economic Advisers,

Federal Reserve Banks of Boston and

Dallas, respectively; and Mr. Hastings,

Financial Economist, Federal Reserve

Bank of St. Louis

Upon motion duly made and seconded,

and by unanimous vote, the minutes of the

meeting of the Federal Open Market Com

mittee held on October 22, 1957 were ap

proved.

Before this meeting there had been distributed to the members

of the Committee a report prepared at the Federal Reserve Bank of New

York covering open market operations during the period October 22

through November 4,

1957, and a supplementary report covering commit

ments executed November 5 through November 8, 1957.

reports have been placed in

Copies of both

the files of the Federal Open Market Com

mittee.

Mr. Rouse reported that open market operations had supplied

reserves during the three weeks since the last meeting.

reliance was placed on repurchase agreements in

Principal

view of projections

showing net borrowed reserves falling to levels in the neighborhood

of $100 to $200 million in the weeks of November 20 and November 27.

By using repurchase agreements, Mr. Rouse said it was hoped that the

run-off of these arrangements at the middle of the month would make

it

possible to avoid outright selling from the System Account while

the Treasury was in the market.

It was anticipated that the Treasury

financing would be announced the latter part of this week and that

11/12/57

-3

the books would be open early next week.

Mr. Rouse went on to say

that there were problems and uncertainties in the period ahead.

The

increase in required reserves resulting from the Treasury cash financ

ing, in

combination with the usual float decline and other seasonal

influences,

would call for about $500 million of reserves in the week

ending December 4 and an additional $300 million would be needed in

the week of December 11.

It was difficult to draw detailed plans as

to how these funds would be supplied in view of the Treasury's cash

problem and the prospect that the Treasury in

draw down its

early December might

Stabilization Fund balance and its

operating balance

with the Reserve Banks, and, in addition, might sell some of the free

gold.

To the extent that any of these actions supplied reserves, the

need for System purchases of Treasury bills would be reduced.

Reviewing current market conditions,

Mr. Rouse pointed out that

expectations with respect to the business situation were an important

influence in the Government securities market,

Prices of Treasury

bonds had been improving, and there was some feeling in the market

that the Treasury could select almost any maturities it

ished in

financing this month, with excellent prospects of success.

its

The im

proved tone in the Government securities market had not extended to

the corporate and municipal markets,

however, where the large volume

of new issues had tended to keep the market under pressure.

The Desk

was successful in buying large amounts of Treasury bills for foreign

and international accounts two weeks ago, at a time when bills came

11/12/57

easily.

-4

More recently, large buying by industrial corporations and

the reinvestment of the proceeds of a recent utility financing had

sharply reduced the market's supply of short-term issues and driven

rates lower.

The Treasury bills sold on Friday vent at an average

rate of 3.47 per cent, and it

rate would move still

was not unlikely that the Treasury bill

further away from the discount rate on the down

side.

and

the

the

ber

and

Thereupon, upon motion duly made

seconded, and by unanimous vote,

open market transactions during

period October 22 through Novem

8, 1957, were approved, ratified,

confirmed.

Mr. Hayes referred to the visit to the Federal Reserve Bank of

New York in October of members of the staff of Congressman Wright Patman,

and he read the following letter that he had received from Mr. Patman

under date of October 25:

"Thank you for your October 18th letter.

"Both Mr. William Johnson and Dr. Clifford Clark have

reported to me on their visit to observe open market opera

tions, and they commented especially on how helpful and

gracious you and your staff were.

"I deeply appreciate your courtesies to them and hope

that I shall have opportunity to visit with you too when I

am in New York."

Mr. Hayes also stated that, as arranged by Chairman Martin,

Senator Wallace Bennett visited the New York Bank on October 23, 1957

for the purpose of observing operations and asking questions concern

ing transactions for the System open market account, and he read a

11/12/57

-5

letter dated November 6 that he had received from the Senator

"I want to acknowledge gratefully the receipt of the

material which you sent me including the chart of the

organization of the New York Bank and a number of speeches

you and Mr. Sproul have made.

"I have been in Utah since I was in New York and have

just come back to my desk in Washington. I haven't had

time yet to read the material but I will do so at the

earliest opportunity.

"Mr. Golembe and I enjoyed our visit to New York very

much.

We got about all we could absorb that one day but

both of us hope we can come back again."

A memorandum from the staff on "Recent Economic and Financial

Developments in the United States and Abroad" had been sent to each

member of the Committee on November 8, 1957.

That memorandum, a copy

of which has been placed in the Committee's files, stated that the

economic climate domestically was in process of change, that expansive

forces had eased, and that contractive forces had become more prominent.

Industrial production declined further in October as did employment and

department store sales, and unemployment claims had been running sharply

above a year earlier.

These changes followed significant weakening in

business sentiment as evidenced by sharp declines in stock market prices,

in prices of sensitive commodities,

and in new orders.

There also had

been a sizable number of professional forecasts of business decline.

The spreading view that business outlays for fixed capital are heading

downward had been given recent support by the McGraw-Hill survey of

plans for capital spending in 1958.

The staff memorandum also pointed

out that private demands for bank credit eased considerably in October,

-6while demands for long-term funds continued strong.

Yields on

Government securities had declined steadily although moderately in

recent weeks.

Stock prices had fluctuated within a fairly narrow

range around a level about a sixth below the July peak.

Despite the

appearance of these recent signs of slackening, the memorandum called

attention to the fact that the domestic economy still was operating

at very high levels.

Chairman Martin now requested that Mr. Young point up the

current economic data, and Mr. Young made a statement as follows:

In our presentation at the last meeting of the Com

mittee, we reported that, more than at any time in recent

months, the pattern of economic indicators pointed to

possible decline in over-all economic activity, and we

intimated further that actual decline might be in process.

The most recently available data confirm that moderate

downward adjustment has, in fact, been occurring. Indeed,

the composite showing that cyclical downturn has now set

in is fairly impressive:

After five months of little

change, output at

factories and mines is expected to show a

drop of as much as 2 index points from

September to October. Declines in activity

were widespread, although most conspicuous

in durable goods lines.

Both freight car loadings and electric power

generation in October were off moderately

further.

The decline in car loadings ex

tends a decline that began in April, and

that for power generation a decline that

commenced in August.

While total new construction holds at a high

level, industrial construction continued

the decline which set in in May.

Business inventory accumulation has slowed

markedly in recent months. In manufacturing,

with declines occurring in new orders and

sales, the inventory-sales ratio in Septem

ber was at levels considerably above the

average of the past two years.

11/12/57

Business capital spending plans for the year ahead

are off significantly, with a decline in expendi

tures of a tenth or more from current levels in

dicated over the next four quarters.

Nonfarm employment receded further in October from

the August peak.

Reductions in both manufactur

ing and nonmanufacturing lines, though small,

were widespread.

Only State and local govern

ment employment registered an increase, although

service and trade employment held about even.

Unemployment in October, after allowance for sea

sonal factors, rose to 4.6 per cent of the labor

force, after holding at 4.2 per cent for three

months, and initial

claims for unemployment in

surance averaged 5 per cent higher than in

October of last year. The average length of the

work week in manufacturing, after stability over

recent months, declined half an hour to 39.5

hours; reductions in hours, though accentuated by

the flu epidemic, were widespread, and operated

to reduce weekly earnings, the average for which

fell one dollar.

Total retail sales, which declined nearly 1 per cent

in September, fell further in October, possibly by

Personal income was apparently also

2 per cent.

for the second consecutive month,

October

down in

with the decline concentrated in wages and salaries.

U. S. exports fell sharply in September to about 10

per cent under the average of the preceding three

months.

Prices of sensitive or basic industrial materials

declined somewhat further in recent weeks and are

now not much above the 1954 recession low.

Since July, business loans at city banks have been

stable, compared with substantial growth in all

other recent years except 1954. The decline in

such loans during October, which was sizable, was

October decline of the postwar period.

the first

In Canada, recession tendencies have become fairly

clear. In Europe, industrial activity by late

spring had ceased expanding and through September

had tapered off moderately. With the exchange

position of many inflationary development economies

tight, world trade impulses stemming from these

economies seem more likely to be contractive than

sustaining or expansive.

-8-

11/12/57

It should be emphasized that downward adjustment in the

domestic economy thus far has been very moderate and that

average wholesale and consumer prices have held relatively

stable.

But with industrial and other capacity substantially

enlarged and with aggregate demand no longer expanding, the

price structure would appear to confront supply pressure.

At a time like the present, perspective is highly impor

tant. A good deal of adjustment in the economy has taken

place during the past two years, first,

in autos and housing,

second, in materials-producing industries, and, most recently,

in selected defense industries, especially military aircraft.

It is possible that auto and housing markets, reflecting in

creased credit availability as that develops with demands

slackening elsewhere, will show special strength, and that

resumption of military ordering will soon set in--indeed, as

an aftermath of Sputnik, will increase.

These developments,

should they occur, could have a considerable effect on an

economic

situation that has already absorbed various important

rolling adjustments, particularly in turning around the

general business climate. On the other hand, turn abouts in

the economic climate do take time, and the most likely prospect

for the immediate future would seem to be for further moderate

downdrift of activity.

Chairman Martin next called upon Mr. Thomas, who made a statement

regarding recent financial developments substantially as follows:

Recent financial developments have reflected the indica

tions of slackening in economic activity discussed by Mr.

They help to corroborate the likelihood of abatement

Young.

The details of these developments

in inflationary pressures.

have been described in the memorandum prepared for the Com

Significant aspects have been the sharp decline in

mittee.

business loans by banks, the recent firming of the market for

Treasury securities, the reduced level of share prices, and

the less than seasonal growth in the money supply this fall.

At the same time, new securities issued by corporations and

by State and local governments continue in large volume, and

Treasury borrowing has been larger than in other recent years.

The continued growth in time deposits at commercial banks has

provided banks with funds for credit expansion. This raises

questions as to the interpretation to be placed on the

slackening in the money supply growth.

The decline in commercial loans at banks in leading

cities during the five weeks ending October 30, amounting

decline shown for that

to over $600 million, was the first

11/12/57

month in the postwar period. Although $400 million of the

decrease represents repayments by finance companies, which

is usual in that month, the remaining decline of over $200

million compares with increases of about $500 million, after

excluding finance companies, in each of the two preceding

Octobers.

For the period since the end of July, eliminating from

consideration the decline in July after the large tax borrow

ing in June, there have been declines or less than seasonal

increases in loans to nearly all groups of borrowers.

In

recent years business loans have generally increased con

siderably during November and December, particularly in the

latter month.

Some increase should occur this year, espe

cially since corporate tax payments in December will be

larger than in the two previous years.

Corporate borrowing in capital markets has continued

at the same high level that has been maintained for the past

12 months but is showing no further increase.

No doubt some

of these receipts have recently been used to reduce bank

loans.

In view of the reduced borrowing from banks and the

indicated curtailment in business capital expanditures some

reduction in corporate offerings of new securities might be

State and local government

expected during the months ahead.

borrowing, however, is likely to continue in large volume.

Treasury borrowing in the market, including that by

Government agencies to raise cash for the Treasury, has been

larger since mid-year than in the same period of other recent

years.

Much of this borrowing has been effected initially

through the banks, and bank holdings of such securities have

increased moderately in contrast to declines in the same

Yet a substantial amount of

period of other recent years.

Government securities has been absorbed by nonbank holders.

Home mortgage credit has continued to increase at a rate

of over 8 per cent a year for the total outstanding--a rate

which, though less than in previous years, can hardly be

It appears that demands for housing are such

called small.

that mortgages might increase even faster if funds were avail

able at rates at which FHA loans could be marketed. Consumer

instalment credit has also increased this year at a pace

which may be above rather than below that which could be

indefinitely sustainable, although the increase in September

was somewhat slower.

Total loans and investments of commercial banks have shown

change since midsummer, as the increase in holdings of

little

securities has approximately offset the unseasonal loan decline.

In the aggregate, bank credit has been supplied since midsummer

in a somewhat smaller amount than in the same period of other

recent years.

11/12/57

-10-

Demands for bank reserves have been notably lighter

this fall than in the same period of the two previous years.

To a small extent this has reflected reserves made available

by gold and foreign transactions and by advance payments by

the Reserve Banks to the Treasury, but principally it has

been due to less than seasonal increases in currencyand in

required reserves.

Until the past week there has been no easing in

the

money market from this development, because a reduction in

Federal Reserve holdings of securities at a time when in

creases are usual kept member bank borrowing at a fairly

high level.

Until two or three weeks ago net borrowed re

serves averaged close to $500 million.

This, together with

the higher discount rate, the generally low liquidity position

of banks, and the frequent Treasury borrowing operations,

served to keep the money market under pressure.

System policy has thus been quite restrictive in

a period

when credit demands have been slackening. To a degree slacken

ing in credit growth was the aim of the restrictive policy.

System operations, however, have absorbed not only additional

reserves

but they

demands,

discount

made

also

thus

rate

available by the so-called operating factors,

have offset the effect of reduced monetary

keeping banks heavily in debt at the higher

established in August.

Estimates based on the projected seasonal pattern for

the remainder of this year, shown in the chart, indicate

that after the next two weeks, during which reserves will

be made available by the mid-month float increase, reserve

needs will mount rapidly.

Approximately $700 million of

additional reserve funds would be needed to keep net borrowed

reserves around the current level of about $350 million. To

the extent that the Treasury makes use of its free gold, the

need for System purchases would be reduced.

It will be recalled that in November and December of

last year and also in December 1955 reserves were made freely

available and net borrowed reserves were negligible. Even so

interest rates rose sharply, reflecting the pressures of

In fact the weakness in the Govern

strong credit demands.

ment securities markets, together with international tensions,

Be

provided the basis for relaxing restraint on reserves.

cause of large temporary liquidity requirements of business

and banks in December, rates on Treasury bills generally rise

Funds

in that month even in periods of relatively easy money.

are needed at the time to meet urgent temporary needs.

The current decline in yields on Government securities,

both short and long, notwithstanding the higher level of net

borrowed reserves than a year ago, probably reflect the

11/12/57

-11-

slackening of credit demands in contrast to the vigorous

demands of last year. The pressure of usual seasonal needs,

however, together with Treasury borrowing demands, may soon

reverse the current decline, at least temporarily, unless

reserves are made readily available.

The Treasury will need to borrow at least $1.5 billion

of cash in December, in addition to a refunding operation,

and some more in January.

The timing of this borrowing is

complicated by debt-limit considerations.

The nature of

these immediate borrowing operations, and of other debt

management in the near future, will need to take into con

sideration the current change in the tone of the Government

securities market and also the possibility of increased

Government expenditures later. Prompt advantage should be

taken of any opportunity to issue long-term securities.

Evidences of abatement of inflationary pressures present

an occasion for a reconsideration of the general direction of

System policy. To some degree the slackening may reflect the

intended and desirable consequences of the restrictive credit

policy in limiting the use of bank credit to meet investment

demands not covered by savings. To a large extent, however,

the slowing down may be viewed as an inevitable reaction to

unsustainable elements in the previous expansion. For example,

one of the main reasons for the prospective decline in business

capital expenditures is that productive capacity in so many

lines is now in excess of sales. In addition, consumer resist

ance to higher prices may be an influence in retarding expan

sion of sales.

Monetary policy could have prevented these developments

only by exerting more restraint on expansion. An easier policy

would have stimulated overexpansion, speculation, and rising

prices, and thus made the inevitable reaction more severe than

it might otherwise be.

Monetary policies need not be changed with a view to

bolstering those sectors that are reacting from overexpansion

or in an attempt to validate the higher prices which consumers

are resisting. Nevertheless, if these corrective forces have

reduced the pressure of demands for excessive bank credit

expansion, there is less need for restraint on bank credit.

When there appears to be a slackening in over-all demands for

bank credit, the long-run objective of fostering sustainable

economic growth does not call for forcing contraction by

keeping member banks heavily in debt at a relatively high

discount rate.

It is possible that demand pressure from accelerated

expansion in State and local government borrowing, in home

11/12/57

-12

mortgages, in consumer credit, and even in Federal Govern

ment expenditures, might more than offset lessened borrow

ing by business. Because of the continuing strong demands

in many sectors, the situation evidently does not call for

flooding the banks with excess reserves or removing the

need for all borrowing. Yet, if sustainable growth is to

be fostered, any slackening in total credit demands should

be permitted to bring about some relaxation of credit

restraints.

Chairman Martin said that the vacation from which he returned

last week had been better than any he had had in

felt his perspective had been refreshed.

five years and that he

He had picked a good time to

be away, he added, stating that he had not seen the article that ap

peared in the New York Times on October 24 by Edward Dale until after

he returned.

He could see how this article justifiably had caused

concern to members of the Committee.

Chairman Martin went on to say

that he did not think the Committee could let newspaper articles and

newspaper irritations, which were going to be with us always, blunt

the Committee's perspective in either direction.

the one that appeared in

An article such as

the New York Times calls attention to the

great responsibility of each of us with respect to what goes on in

open market meetings, he said, and this applies to the members of the

staff as well as to the members of the Board and the Reserve Bank

Presidents.

In reading the Dale article, it was not difficult to think

that someone may have said something that gave an inkling of what

transpired in

one of these meetings.

Articles of this type could not

be prevented, and it would be most unfortunate if the Committee per

mitted this clearing house for System policy discussions in any

way

11/12/57

-13

to be lessened in scope and purpose.

It was necessary to get all the

views and thoughts possible, the Chairman said, and this was the only

clearing house in a large System that provided an opportunity for such

exchanges.

As he had commented before, no one should feel bound by

the views he initially expressed in

open market meetings,

recognize that these were a step in

the process of policy decision.

and we should

Chairman Martin went on to say that he thought it

perfectly

obvious that there had been a major change in psychology.

He could

see it clearly while he was away; he did not see it quite as clearly

now that he had gotten back.

Last Friday the members of the Board had

had an economic go-around which made it clear that there was no longer

a question of forecasting a change in the economy; it

of recognizing what was on us.

mittee would be blind if

it

was a question

In the Chairman's opinion, the Com

ignored these developments.

There were a

number of ways in which the Committee could recognize the changed

could put in reserves through the open market.

The

discount rates of the Federal Reserve Banks could be changed.

The

situation.

It

Committee's directive could be modified.

One of the advantages of

the System was that it had a top staff that should express views

freely, whether the Committee agreed or disagreed with those views.

As a prelude to this meeting,

Chairman Martin said he would ask Mr.

Riefler who worked with him closely on these matters and who also had

just returned from vacation to give his thoughts on the situation.

This would be done as a means of getting all the cards on the table.

11/12/57

-14

The final conclusions of the Committee would, of course, result from

decisions made after members of the staff and members of the Committee

and other Reserve Bank Presidents had expressed their thoughts.

Mr. Riefler said that he was quite surprised when he came back

from vacation to find how definitely the psychology had changed.

It

seemed to him that this presented for the System a problem of posture

and policy.

This had been a long capital boom with strong inflationary

tendencies going on all over the world.

It had gradually and finally

built up excess capacity to a point where that was now taking over.

Mr. Riefler did not know how long that sort of thing would go on, but

his own feeling was that the tendencies the other way had a very good

chance of being persistent since it

capacity.

This time, however,

tion growth to help.

would take time

to absorb over

there was the great ace of rapid popula

On the other hand, the expansion in

capacity had

been world wide.

At this time the correct policy seemed obscure, Mr. Riefler

said.

For example, there was the suggestion of Business Week for

reducing reserve requirements of central reserve city banks.

it

That,

seemed to him, in the climate of the bond market would have the

effect of shoving banks into speculation in bonds.

There was con

siderable expectation that when the Federal Reserve shifted policy

there would be a boom market in bonds and, even though there

something to that view, he felt

was

there was a speculative danger.

Personally, Mr. Riefler did not feel much inclined toward a decrease

ll/12/57

-15

in reserve requirements or for a policy of flooding banks with re

serves at this time.

He did not think this a period at all like

1953 when there was a genuine knot and when putting excess reserves

into the market in

quantity had delayed effects in

relieving the knot.

On the other hand, the System had the problem of posture.

to take a correct posture in

It

terms of the changed outlook if

needed

it

hoped

to retain the understanding and support of the people.

The present posture of the System, Mr. Riefler said, is

one of

having gone up a full one-half per cent in discount rates in August at

a time when the business situation was level and at a time when the

System's policy was under quite heavy criticism in Congress,

a posture that made it

clear to the world without any doubt that the

Federal Reserve was not going to finance inflation.

done its

job.

before it

That was

Usually, the System feels its

way in

The action had

the open market

moves on the discount rate, Mr. Riefler noted.

It would seem

to him in this particular situation, however, that the most appropriate

thing to do would be to reduce the discount rate to 3 per cent very

shortly.

That would be an unmistakable sign to everybody of a changed

posture and of a recognition of a generally changed situation.

Ac

companying that move, Mr. Riefler said, he would go towards somewhat

easier bank reserves but he certainly would not flood the market with

reserves and would not go into any reserve requirements reduction at

this time.

He felt the investment market should work out of its

situation in an orderly manner.

-16-

11/12/57

The most serious financial problem looming up was in the

area of the structure of the Federal debt, Mr. Riefler suggested.

It seemed to him as though the debt ceiling was gone in any event,

with the existing public attitude toward Sputnik and the strong

demand that money must be spent for defense purposes.

Thus, the

debt ceiling was gone on two counts: (1) a decline in revenues, and

(2) a prospective increase in expenditures for defense.

So far as

the availability of resources was concerned, this defense spending

program would come on at a time when there was a decline in spending

from private capital sources.

This was manageable, Mr. Riefler said.

In fact, he could not think of a better time for diversion of resources

to defense than on a declining picture.

the prospect looked somewhat disastrous.

However, on the financial aide,

At present the structure of

the large floating Federal debt was as unbalanced as it

ever had been.

An increase in total debt under the circumstances could present an

appalling problem.

On the other hand, there was, of course, a rather

general expectation in the market that there would be a boom market

in bonds.

Advantage should be taken of this.

On the financial front,

he felt that the best procedure would be to use the next four months

for as rapid a program of reducing the floating debt as was practicable,

Perhaps there should be an exchange of unmaturing issues for longer

debt instruments.

Mr. Hayes then presented his views on business activity and

credit policy, his comments being substantially as follows:

11/12/57

-17-

There is no longer much doubt that at least a mild down

turn in business activity is under way, and there is widespread

belief that it will probably continue well into 1958. Evidence

pointing in this direction is available in many segments of the

economy and in virtually all sections of the country.

I have

in mind particularly the further decline in industrial production

and retail sales in October; the significant rise in unemployment

to nearly 5 per cent of the labor force; the prospect of some

reduction in inventories which, at the manufacturers' level,

have become rather high in relation to sales and new orders; the

development of excess capacity in a growing number of industries;

the confirmation of somewhat reduced capital spending plans for

1958 as compared with this year; the depressing effect of recent

Defense Department economy moves on business activity and senti

ment; and the probable reduced demand of foreign countries for

American goods. On the favorable side, residential building

seems to have stabilized and has shown some signs of renewed

strength, while public construction continues to expand. With

respect to unemployment, it seems likely that further increases

will occur in coming months even if the level of output should

remain unchanged, both because the labor force is growing and

because of the prospect of more pronounced gains in productivity

than in the last year.

Price developments in the last few weeks have been in keep

ing with the general slowing down in the economy already out

lined. The decline in wholesale prices noted in September appears

While the October

to have carried somewhat further in October.

consumer price index is not yet available, there is some hope that

if any gain over September and that seasonal

it will show little

declines in food prices may hold the index pretty steady for the

rest of the year.

Although the sharp deterioration in business sentiment of

recent weeks may be viewed as in part a psychological phenomenon,

receiving considerable stimulus from the persistent weakness of

the stock market, it is now clear that it rests in part on a

definite weakening of underlying business statistics. The major

question now seems to be not whether a further business decline

The views of

will occur, but for how long and in what degree.

projections

involving

are

reassuring,

most business economists

in

dollar terms,

product,

national

with

gross

of a mild downturn,

slight ad

though

a

continued

with

and

unchanged

remaining about

production

in

drop

a

moderate

with

but

vance in consumer prices,

other

the

On

unemployment.

in

increase

and some significant

for a

"ripe"

is

economy

the

that

argue

economists

hand, a few

In

possible.

believe

observers

most

than

jolt

severe

more

much

this view, attention is centered on the extended loan position

of the banks, reduced corporate liquidity and high consumer

11/12/57

-18-

indebtedness, and also on the possibility that recent surveys

of business capital spending, while correctly indicating the

direction of future outlays, may seriously understate the

magnitude of the declines involved. Such understatement could

result from future modifications in spending plans in the light

of the recent deterioration in business psychology or because

of further downward revisions in expectations as to consumer

spending.

I am inclined to take the more optimistic of these two

views, first

because many of the capital spending program

covered in recent surveys seem reasonably firm, and second

because news with respect to defense spending will on balance

probably have a stimulating effect on business sentiment in

coming months.

The already announced relaxation in previous

military expenditure ceilings, together with public pressure

for quick action to intensify missile development, may soon

lead to markedly higher rates of orders, even though actual

defense outlays may not expand materially for some time to

come.

Statistics on bank credit changes in the past four weeks

clearly confirm a pronounced slackening in pressure as compared

with 1956.

This is true of business loans, and particularly of

short-term seasonal borrowings.

It is also true of total loans,

and of loans and investments.

We have made very rough estimates

suggesting that the money supply at the end of 1957 may be about

1 per cent lower than a year earlier.

The tendency toward re

duced pressure is scarcely visible as yet in the corporate bond

heavy calendar of new offeringsmarkets, because of a still

but the recent action of the Government security market points

clearly to widespread expectations of diminished pressure in

coming months, even though the Treasury will be faced with

sizable refunding and cash-financing problems. We must, of

course, take account of the prospect that the Treasury will

probably be borrowing something like $1.5 billion for payment

partly in late November and partly in early December, in

addition to the substantial December 1 refunding.

Coming to the question of credit policy, I feel that it

is not necessary for us to attempt to judge at this point

whether the prospective business decline will be mild or severe,

The important point is that the

and of short or long duration.

evidence now available clearly suggests that we can safely go

further than we have in relaxing credit restraint without adding

significantly to the threat of inflation. Prompt action in this

direction seems desirable in view of the possibility, however

remote, that the business adjustment may be more than a mild dip.

But I see no reason why we cannot move gradually and cautiously

11/12/57

-19-

in the first

instance, being prepared to reverse our actions

if the business news improves substantially, or to adopt a

more aggressive program if the outlook deteriorates further.

I agree with Mr. Thomas' view as expressed in his recent

memorandum that we should allow the lessened demand for bank

credit to be reflected in an easier tone in the money market;

and to my mind, this easier tone might well produce a some

what lower level of market interest rates. While I like to

think of our instructions to the Manager as being expressed

in rather general terms, i.e., to pursue a somewhat easier

policy than that of recent weeks, if we are to use some kind

of benchmark in terms of net borrowed reserves, I would pro

pose a figure of roughly a quarter of a billion dollars,

perhaps with fluctuations of plus or minus 100 million dollars,

around that figure--all subject to the usual proviso that the

Manager should have ample leeway to adjust for the "feel of

the market" and to the further proviso that doubts should be

resolved on the side of ease, especially in view of the

Some sales

Treasury financing expected in the next few weeks.

might be required in the coming week; but I would hesitate to

be very definite on this score, preferring to leave the Manager

ample leeway. Incidentally, it would seem appropriate to in

crease the System's holdings of bankers' acceptances in con

junction with any open market purchases of Government securities

required in the next few weeks.

I think the Board of Governors might appropriately continue

to give serious consideration to a reduction in reserve require

This would be one way

ments at the central reserve city banks.

of meeting the seasonal reserve needs of the banking system.

Perhaps the economic statistics do not yet support the need for

this action, which probably would be interpreted as an overt

move toward easier credit policy, but new evidence during the

next few weeks might provide appropriate occasion for the action.

week in December might

If such a move is to be made, the first

be a suitable time, when reserves so released would obviate the

need for open market purchases which will otherwise probably be

The Board may also wish to review within the next

required.

few weeks the matter of a possible reduction in margin require

ments under Regulations T and U.

The time has not come, in my opinion, to reduce discount

The directors of the New York Bank concur in this view,

rates.

although they are at the same time emphatically of the opinion

that we should be making a start at this time toward diminished

It may well be that

restraint, through open market operations.

the lessened demand for bank credit--and the easier tone in the

money market that should be allowed to develop as a result--

11/12/57

-20

might lead to somewhat lower interest rates on Treasury

bills and other short-term instruments.

This in turn

might provide the setting for a subsequent reduction in

discount rates.

The directive should be amended, if the Committee

agrees that some such policy as that outlined above should

be adopted. To the extent that policy in the period ahead

will be guided by a willingness to provide for prospective

seasonal credit expansion, the directive might well reflect

this intention.

I would suggest the following wording for

clause (b) in the directives

"to foster sustainable economic growth by

supplying reserves to provide for prospec

tive seasonal needs while remaining alert

to continued though lessened inflationary

pressures.

Mr. Erickson said that conditions in the First District followed

pretty much the national picture.

Business sentiment appeared to be

weaker and this weakness appeared to be outrunning the weakness in busi

ness performance.

minuses.

As in the national picture, there were plusses and

Employment was still good, especially in the service produc

ing industries, but manufacturing employment was continuing its

down

ward trend.

Shoe production for the country as a whole may match the

1956 total.

For the first nine months last year New England had 3

cent of that production.

formance was still

inventories.

This year it was 33 per cent.

very disappointing.

up.

Readjustment in

continuing, due to increased productive capacity.

industry presented a mixed picture.

Textile per

Mill margins were down as were

Some mill managers believe there is

industry can go and that is

per

only one way the

paper industries was

The electronics

TV inventories were in better

position and prospects were good for some types of computors.

The

-21.

11/12/57

Government contract picture was said to be very confused.

tool orders continued a downward trend.

Machine

Ordinarily at this time of

year the machine tool people would be getting orders in connection

with the 1959 cars.

No orders have appeared as yet, and they are of

the opinion that there will be no radical changes in the 1959 auto

mobile.

Electric power distribution was showing a declining rate of

expansion.

Construction contract awards for the first nine months of

this year were 5 per cent better than last year and residential build

ing was up 4 per cent.

Department store sales for the first nine and

a half months were one per cent behind last year.

Mr. Erickson then reported on a follow-up survey of capital ex

penditures of some 150 companies made last month.

Those companies now

estimate that in 1957 they will spend almost 4 per cent more than they

did last year.

This, however, would not be as high as estimated

earlier in the year.

These companies also were asked what their ex

pectations for 1958 expenditures might be.

they would spend less than in 1957,

Only 95 replied,

48 stating

while 27 planned to spend more and

20 no change.

As to credit policy, Mr. Erickson said he thought a change

should be made in the directive.

He would make no change in

the dis

count rate at this time, preferring to wait until the next meeting or

next month.

As far as open market operations were concerned, he felt

that the restraint should be lessened to the extent that net borrowed

11/12/57

-22

reserves might fluctuate between $200 and $300 million, and if

errors

were made they should be on the lower side.

Mr.

Irons said that the economic factors in

were turning moderately downward.

On the whole,

the national picture

the weakening had been

quite slight with the possibility of offsetting factors coming into the

picture.

In the Eleventh District, there had not been much change in

recent weeks.

The confidence quotient was one of caution, recognizing

that there had been less than seasonal growth in some areas and some

actual declines.

The petroleum industry had not changed much since

the preceding meeting and Mr. Irons thought that it would take some

time for correction of the situation in that industry.

The aircraft

industry had been affected by defense moves and there had been some

layoffs of workers.

There had been a little

damage to the cotton

crop in the last couple of weeks because of an early frost.

Evidences

of strength in

total

the Eeventh District included an increase in

employment, construction contract awards running a little above last

year, and recently quite strong demand for bank loans in contrast with

the decline in the country as a whole.

Some leading bankers reported

a shift of borrowings by national corporations out of New York and

Chicago to Dallas, perhaps a temporary move.

felt

On balance, Mr.

Irons

that activity in the Eleventh District was at a high level.

On credit policy, thinking only in

period, Mr.

terms of a three-week

Irons thought the Committee must take into consideration

the developing deflationary forces that were beginning to appear in

11/12/57

-23

the past month or two.

However, he would not shift as much toward

ease as he understood Messrs. Hayes and Erickson to have suggested,

but would attempt to maintain approximately the degree of restraint

achieved during the past few weeks.

With respect to basic policy, Mr. Irons did not think this

was the time to change discount rates or reserve requirements, or to

take away other basic steps of that nature, although he recognised

it

was certainly not a time for further restraint.

Assuming that

discount rates were not to be reduced, he would hope that market rates,

including the bill

rate.

rate, would conform fairly closely to the discount

He doubted that policy should contribute to an easing that

would bring about a reduction in

rates at this time.

Member bank

borrowing might be in the $600-$700 million range during this period

and, while he did not have much regard for the net borrowed reserve

figure as a guide, something in the neighborhood of $300-$400 million

would be sufficient.

Pressure during the past four weeks had been

appropriate in Mr. Irons'

opinion and he did not think the System had

accentuated the slight declining tendency that had appeared.

In

another three to six weeks the desirability of a more definite step

might become apparent, Mr.

Irons said,

adding that he was not ignoring

recent factors but he did not think that a need for change was yet

crystal clear.

The System should not act to maintain a preconceived

level of net borrowed reserves but should meet requirements as they

develop, while giving consideration to the movement of market rates

11/12/57

-24

relative to the discount rate.

The Committee's directive might be changed, Mr.

but he would hesitate to put into it

suggested in

what he understood Mr. Hayes

the way of a statement that the Committee intended to

supply seasonal needs.

meet seasonal needs.

Mr.

Irons said,

The Committee would always be expected to

If the directive were lacking anything--and

Irons did not think the present wording was bad--it might be

lacking the thought of a mixture of factors,

some developing deflationary factors.

the first

If

some inflationary and

a change in

clause (b) of

paragraph of the directive were to be made, Mr.

Irons would

think of something along lines that would call for "sustainable

economic growth under conditions characterized by both inflationary

and deflationary forces".

Mr.

Mangels said that not much new statistical material had

become available on Twelfth District conditions since the preceding

meeting but such figures as had been reported confirmed the recent

pessimism in

business sentiment.

down and employment in

utilities,

The production trend was slightly

manufacturing, mining, transportation, public

and Government had dropped.

In the aircraft industry

employment in September declined 2 per cent for the second month and

related defense industries were being affected by cutbacks.

unemployment was 63 per cent higher than a year ago,

crease appearing in

situation.

Insured

the largest in

the Pacific Northwest because of thenumber

All types of construction--residential,

nonresidential,

11/12/57

-25

public works, utilities--declined 18 per cent in September from a

year ago but for the first

more than in 1956.

nine months of 1957 totalled slightly

Department store sales during the last four

weeks were down 2 per cent but for the first

ten months of this

year shoved a 1 per cent increase over a year ago,

September auto

mobile registrations in California were 8 per cent above August and

30 per cent ahead of September last year.

Bank loans during the past

three weeks shoved a decline compared with a year ago.

were about the same as a year ago.

Demand deposits

Twelfth District banks recently had

become net buyers of Federal funds and in the week ending November 6

a larger number of banks were borrowing at the Federal Reserve than in

the recent past although the aggregate amount of borrowings remained

nominal.

On the over-all picture, Mr. Mangels said that it

though plant and equipment expansion had reached a crest.

looked as

With the

completion of many projects, expanded capacity could produce suf

ficiently to put consumer goods on a competitive basis.

There had

been enough restraint to hold back further upward pressures.

Mr.

Mangels did not think the System should put on so much restraint as

to force activity down too far too fast.

He noted that September

wholesale prices had declined slightly and that a further alight

decline in

October might be expected.

Bank loans were down although

public issues of corporate and other securities were still

high.

The Treasury would require new cash and the System should consider

11/12/57

-26

those needs seriously.

Mr. Mangels thought that perhaps serious

inflation was no longer a threat and that the economy may have

reached a turning point with greater weight beginning to shift to

the deflationary side, although when this would occur was uncertain.

Until there was more positive evidence in the form of more serious

unemployment, for example, or more serious price declines, Mr. Mangels

thought that policy should continue a moderate degree of restraint.

He had in mind net borrowed reserves in the $200-$400 million range,

perhaps more in the lower area.

The Manager of the System Account

should have full leeway in operations.

Mr. Mangels did not think

the discount rate should be changed now although this might be neces

sary in the near future.

At a meeting of the directors of the San

Francisco Bank tomorrow this question would undoubtedly be discussed,

some directors having indicated their feeling that the rate might well

be reduced.

As to the directive, Mr. Mangels thought that clause (b)

might well be changed to shift the emphasis along the lines suggested

by Mr. Balderston at the preceding meeting so that the clause would

read "to fostering sustainable economic growth, restraining infla

tionary developments, recognizing uncertainties in the business out

look, the financial markets, and in the international situation."

Mr. Deming said that in the Ninth District the situation

seemed to be a little stronger than in the nation as a whole, although

there were signs of less strength or more weakness than had been

anticipated.

The more favorable situation in the district reflected

11/12/57

-27.

the position of farmers and some strength in residential building.

Employment was still higher than last year although unemployment had

crept up.

Taking out Montana, there had not been much change in the

district as a whole in recent weeks. Hours worked had declined slightly.

For what it

was worth, Mr. Deming stated that forecasts by the unemploy

ment agency for Minnesota indicated that the number of unemployed by

next Friday would be about 4,000 higher than last February in the State

of Minnesota,

reflecting the situation in mining.

Deming stated, business sentiment in

over the past three weeks.

Without question, Mr.

the Ninth District had deteriorated

Even such developments as would ordinarily

be regarded favorably were being looked upon unfavorably in

some quarters.

For example, the clean-up of 1957 model automobiles which had been very

good was now being interpreted by some dealers as borrowing sales from

1958.

As to policy, Mr. Deming said he would associate himself pretty

much with the views expressed by Mr. Hayes excepting his feeling on

reserve requirements.

Mr. Deming thought this was not the time for any

dramatic move to signal a change in Federal Reserve policy.

He would

go along with some easing that would be reflected in net borrowed

reserves around the $250 million level.

Mr.

Allen referred to two meetings of Seventh District business

economists that had been held during the past ten days,

the first

stating that for

time in four years a considerable majority of opinion now

pointed to a continuing decline in business activity.

The Ann Arbor

11/12/57

-28

business outlook conference held on November 4 and 5 reflected

similar sentiments.

representing firms in

With about 100 economists in

attendance

finance and industry in the East and Midwest,

most expected the industrial production index to be lower next year.

The majority opinion was that price inflation had ended or at least

had slowed markedly.

The expected drop in

capital expenditures of

business was emphasized at both these meetings,

of the economists in

Mr.

Allen said.

Many

the Seventh District area believed that the de

cline in capital outlays in 1958 would be 10 per cent rather than the

7 per cent indicated by the McGraw-Hill survey of business plans.

This would be especially important in

the Seventh District, Mr.

Allen

noted, since that district accounts for approximately one-third the

nation's production of machinery of all

output and sales,

office equipment,

On the other hand,

capital goods industries look to improvement

some of the district's

in

types.

namely farm equipment,

road building equipment,

and electric generating apparatus.

Mr. Allen said

that as far as he was concerned the prospective decline in

expenditures was a welcome event.

After all,

it

would be a decline

from an excessive level and the lower level would still

historical standards.

capital

be large by

He referred to a report that had appeared in

a Chicago paper that next year over-all construction would exceed

this year's total by about 5 per cent,

and that increased home and

public building would more than offset the estimated 7 per cent

decline in

capital expenditures reported by the

McGraw-Hill survey.

11/12/57

-29

The strong trend in retail trade noted earlier this fall had

not been maintained, Mr. Allen said.

General merchandise stores were

operating at about the same level as a year ago despite price increases.

Sales of these stores were considered disappointing in each of the past

two years but the Christmas upturn made the fourth quarter appear

favorable.

Mr. Allen then commented on the automobile industry, stating

that the report in last Friday's Wall Street Journal covered the situa

tion well although there was an error in the figure for unsold new cars

in dealers' hands on November 1, that is, the Journal reported a

500,000 figure whereas the correct figure was 560,000 of which 250,000

were 1957 models.

The industry seemed to be well satisfied with the

clean-up of those models.

As usual, production was expected to con

tinue at a high rate until early 1958 when dealers' show rooms should

be stocked and sales would become a factor bearing on production.

In

Detroit it was felt that wage contract negotiations in the coming spring

would influence manufacturers to push for high production and sizable

inventories in the intervening months, whereas labor stoppages would

be a counteracting influence in the opposite direction.

The labor

difficulties have already begun, Mr. Allen noted, referring to a strike

in

a General Motors transmission plant.

As for monetary policy, Mr. Allen said that he thought the

statements by the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Board of

Governors in their speeches last week were very good.

The changes

11/12/57

-30

in the business situation, such as they are, seemed to him necessary

adjustments.

He referred to the expression Mr.

Thomas had used

describing the effects of monetary policy thus far as "intended and

desirable" results of what the Committee had been trying to bring

about.

Mr. Allen felt his views were closer to those expressed by

Mr. Irons than others who had spoken thus far.

If

the Committee were

concerned about the situation and felt that there should be some

easing, he doubted that the level of net borrowed reserves would

matter very much, and he would keep this figure around $350 million,

about where it

now is.

Riefler's comments,

Mr. Allen said he was interested in

Mr.

and when the Committee felt that the time for a

change was desirable his view was that the discount rate would be the

place where a move should be made.

now.

Mr.

He was not ready to make that move

Hayes had commented that the directors of the New York Bank

were unanimously against a move in discount rate right now, Mr. Allen

noted, and he expressed the view that some of the directors of the

Chicago Bank would be opposed to a change, although he believed they

would favor a change in the discount rate as the first move when

action in that direction was taken. On the directive, Mr. Allen said

that Mr. Hayes' suggestion seemed satisfactory although he would leave

out the words "though lessened" in referring to inflationary pressures,

believing that with the wage settlements coming up next year the time

had not yet come to recognize lessened inflationary pressures.

Mr. Leedy said that views expressed at a meeting o

the di

rectors of the Kansas City Bank last week, with respect both to conditions

11/12/57

in

-31

the Tenth District and to sentiment generally, were anything but

bearish.

Member bank borrowings had increased sharply since the

meeting three weeks ago, apparently a result of a lower level of

interbank balances at city correspondents and of lower Treasury

balances.

In addition, the annual tax assessment made in

Oklahoma,

under which intangibles held as of November 30 were taxable, was

causing some shifting of bank balances out of the district temporarily.

It

seemed to Mr. Leedy that the signs were so clear with re

spect to the decline in economic activity that the Committee could not

fail to heed them and do something about them.

However, any precipitate

action might contribute to further deterioration in market and business

sentiment.

His view was that such action was not yet required, Mr.

Leedy said, but for the immediate future he thought the Committee

should be operating with a considerably lower level of net borrowed

reserves,

perhaps in

the $100$250

million area.

On the discount rate,

the latest move in August had been to bring that rate into conformity

with the level of market rates.

He did not think a downward adjustment

in the rate could be made on that basis.

He felt that a lower level of

Perhaps the discount

net borrowed reserves should first

be signaled.

rate should then lead the market.

Mr. Leedy would make no change in

reserve requirements of central reserve city banks for much the same

reasons that he did not think a precipitate move in

should be taken at this time.

the discount rate

He would favor some change in wording

of clause (b) of the Committee's directive to the effect that policy

11/12/57

-32

should be with the view to "maintaining restraint on the expansion of

credit in

the interest of sustainable growth, while taking account of

contractive elements in

the economy,"

with respect to uncertainties now in

and continuing the phraseology

the directive.

He felt it

im

portant that the directive set out that the Committee was taking

account of contractive elements.

Mr. Leach said there was evidence that the areas of weakness

in the Fifth District economy had spread somewhat during the past few

weeks.

However,

tion in

the slide-off in

there were no indications of an appreciable accelera

the principal industries.

small decrease in hours worked in

There had been a

the textile industry, and a number

of the larger cotton mills were planning longer-than-usual shutdowns

at Thanksgiving and Christmas.

Declining sales recently had been

reported by department stores, furniture stores, and household ap

pliance stores, and by a majority of reporting automobile dealers.

The increase in

was less than is

aggregate nonagricultural employment in

September

usually experienced.

With respect to policy, Mr.

Leach said he thought the Com

mittee should attempt to maintain enough tightness to prevent the

resurgence of inflationary pressures but not enough tightness to

accelerate the over-all downturn in

the economy.

This would pre

sumably permit adjustments now under way to continue.

the downward trend in

In view of

virtually all economic indicators, including

the contraseasonal movement of business loans, he thought the degree

11/12/57

-33-

of restraint maintained in recent weeks could be modified without

running much risk as to the resurgence of inflationary pressures.

He was not thinking of a shift so substantial as to be interpreted

as a shift from restraint to ease, or one that would require abrupt

action if renewed evidences of inflation should appear.

In terms

of net borrowed reserves perhaps $200 million would be a suitable

benchmark.

Mr. Leach added the comment that the discussion this

morning made him feel more strongly than before that the net

borrowed reserves figure had some use as a benchmark but not as a

goal.

That is, the figures do serve as indicators of the degree

of tightness, and if the Committee were going to make any change

in the degree of tightness these figures would have to get down

around $150 or $200 million in order to indicate a change from the

present.

Mr. Leach went on to say that he was inclined to feel that

such dramatic action as lowering of the discount rate would be a

mistake at this time, although he had a strong feeling that the

Committee's directive must be changed.

The record should not show

that the Committee failed to recognize a change in the economic outlook from what it was some months ago when the present wording of

the directive was adopted.

For some time the Committee had been

endeavoring to restrain inflationary developments,

said he thought it had succeeded.

and Mr. Leach

However, he thought the Committee

11/12/57

-34-

would not wish to continue saying in its

to restrain:

rather, it

directive that it

was trying

would now seem better to say in substance

that it wished to prevent the resurgence of inflationary developments.

A change in the directive clearly was needed, Mr. Leach said, and he

felt it should provide for less restraint but not for ease.

He would

not care particularly to put in a reference to meeting seasonal needs.

His suggested wording of clause (b) of the first paragraph of the

directive would read "to preventing the resurgence of inflationary

pressures in the interest of sustainable economic growth, while

recognizing increasing uncertainties in the business outlook, the

financial markets,

and the international situation."

gradually rather than abruptly,

at this time that it

We should proceed

he said, because we could not be sure

might not become necessary to reverse what we

were doing.

Referring again to the discount rate, Mr. Leach said he would

not be particularly happy to see a lowering of the rate now and an

increase a little

later, although he would like to use the discount

rate some time as a lead action, rather than always as a catch-up

Nevertheless, he hesitated to use the discount rate as a

action.

lead action at this time since such a change might indicate that the

Federal Reserve was anticipating more of a downturn than was actually

the case.

Mr. Robertson said that none of the statements and none of

the facts presented today left

him with a feeling of pessimism.

Public

11/12/57

-35-

psychology, which he felt should be weighed more heavily than any

other factor, was at a low point in the East but seemed to be quite

high in the western three-quarters of the country.

Consequently,

he would align himself completely with the views of Messrs. Irons

and Allen.

The Committee should not close its eyes to the fact that

there has been a downturn, but it should not be panicked by it; it

merely indicated to Mr. Robertson that the policy the Committee had

been following was actually working.

The policy should not be pressed

harder, Mr. Robertson said, but he would not change the discount rate

at the present time and would not reduce the volume of net borrowed

reserves.

He would be flexible and prepared to move whenever that

was called for.

Although he did not think a sharp move was called

for at this time, Mr. Robertson said he agreed with the suggestion

that the directive should be changed to get away from the idea that

the Committee was directing policy completely toward fighting inflation.

If the directive recognized that there were signs of developing

deflationary trends, that would be a sufficient indication of a

flexible policy, Mr. Robertson said.

If, three weeks hence, conditions

indicated a further downward trend in economic activity, it might be

time to consider a reduction in reserve requirements as well as in

discount rates.

For the present, the Committee should move sidewise,

holding its place and always remaining as flexible as possible, but

he emphasized that flexibility does not involve jumping back and

forth just for the sake of jumping.

In sum, Mr. Robertson would not

11/12/57

-36-

change the policy of restraint at the present time, would not change

the discount rate, would not change the level of net borrowed re-

serves, but would modify the directive.

Mr. Shepardson said that his feelings were much the same as

those expressed by Mr. Robertson.

All of us recognized that there

had been some changes in the situation.

Mr. Shepardson felt these

changes had been desirable and in the direction that the Committee

had been aiming for some time past in trying to bring the inflationary

forces under control.

There was still a strong possibility of a re-

surgence of upward pressures from expansion to come in defense

expenditures and other factors, and any overt move toward ease, any

positive change in direction of policy, would seem to him to be a

mistake at this time.

Under present conditions, there was an oppor-

tunity to bring about some material gains in efficiency.

If the

current restraint continued for a time, many persons might do some

pruning of inefficiencies that had come into the econonomy. This would

be all to the good.

The Committee should have in mind the possibility

of the coming wage negotiations and should maintain as far as possible

the kind of climate that would hold some restraint against wage moves

such as had been witnessed in the past.

At the same time, the Com-

mittee should recognize the slackening of inflationary pressures, and

restraint should not be increased in any way.

Mr. Shepardson's

preference would be to hold just about the degree of restraint of

the past three weeks, not taking positive steps to ease but being

11/12/57

-37-

careful not to increase pressure.

He agreed that there should be a

change in the wording of the directive and he liked the suggestion

Mr. Leach had made.

Mr. Fulton aligned himself completely with the views Mr.

Shepardson had expressed.

There are evidences of greater than ade-

quate capacity in the heavy goods industries that resulted from the

considerable expansion of plants and this added capacity is just not

being fully used.

psychological

Businessmen and consumers are going through a

reversal from conditions prevailing over the past year.

There has been a jolt because of the earth satellites launched by the

Russians.

Business does not now feel there is a chance of an upturn

this year and, after a sidewise movement, there might be a moderate

downward movement next year.

Mr. Fulton thought this would be of

benefit to industry in that some of the "fluff" would be taken out.

Inventories were believed to be in such shape that an upturn in consumer demand would come back promptly to basic manufacturers.

whole economic system could open up very rapidly.

The

Mr. Fulton com-

mented on a meeting in Cleveland a few days ago attended by 23 economists

from industry, stating that their projections of the industrial production index indicated a slight decline in the first quarter of 1958,

some further let-down in the second quarter, but a rise in the third

quarter of the year.

Their conclusions were that unemployment would

not be excessive.

Mr. Fulton said he felt the Federal Reserve should not reduce

the discount rate at this time.

This would be too sharp a change in

11/12/57

-38-

posture and in direction.

Perhaps net borrowed reserves should be

reduced to the $250-300 million area, but nothing dramatic should

be done at this time.

economy.

Any dramatic move could easily upset the

The Committee's directive might well be modified to recognise

the change that had taken place in the economy,

but nothing should be

done that would be abrupt in the direction of ease.

Mr. Williams said that in the past several months there had

been indications that sentiment on the pessimistic side had been outrunning statistics.

sentiment.

Now the statistics were beginning to confirm the

This could be observed in loans of large city banks.

In

the past six weeks loans for business purposes had fallen off persistently in the Philadelphia District.

Without exception, the lowest

point in those loans was in the latest figures.

Final figures on

capital expenditures in the Philadelphia District showed that plans

for 1958 were almost universally on the pessimistic side, with all

manufacturing showing a decline of 13 per cent, durables a decline

of 10.5 per cent, and nondurables a decline of 15.5 per cent.

The directors of the Philadelphia Reserve Bank had become

vocal on the question of the business outlook and credit policy, Mr.

Williams said, referring to a discussion on the matter at last week's

meeting of the directors at the conclusion of which the Chairman of

the Board was directed to send a letter to the Board of Governors

calling for a change in policy through open market operations.

After

11/12/57

-39-

reading the letter that the Chairman of the Philadelphia Bank had

sent to the Board of Governors,

Mr. Williams stated that he felt

the objective for net borrowed reserves should be lowered to the

$100-$250 million range.

The Committee's directive should be changed,

but Mr. Williams would turn the job of detailed wording over to someone else.

He felt it evident that we were beyond a position of un-

certainty and that the Federal Reserve could assume a posture not by

changing the discount rate, but by easing operations through the

System Open Market Account.

Mr. Bryan said that, with the possible exception of Florida,

the Sixth District was showing changes in a downward direction--not

dramatic, but a series of small changes.

He was greatly impressed

with the shift in business sentiment and statistics in recent weeks.

At the meeting of the directors of the Atlanta Bank last Friday, a

full discussion of the situation showed a remarkable shift in the

sense of ebullience and exuberance that had existed.

Mr.

Bryan felt

that the System was confronted with a difficult problem in policy.

The statistics showed deterioration in the situation, and if the

System were dealing merely with the question of a short-run deterioration, he would favor a considerable easing of monetary policy at this

time.

However,

the problem was more difficult because of a difference

between the short-run and longer-run outlook,

The longer run con-

siderations, Mr. Bryan felt, might require a fairly high rate of

interest in view of the need over the longer pull to encourage savings

11/12/57

-40-

to take care of the population growth,

and because,

as Mr. Riefler

had mentioned, the Federal debt ceiling and budget limitation were

gone as a result of missile developments.

Mr. Bryan said that he leaned a little

Under the circumstances,

more toward easing the situa-

tion, perhaps not by immediate and overt action, than he did toward

maintaining the present degree of restraint.

He had reached this

conclusion believing there was an inherent danger in the present

situation.

Just as the strength and duration of booms tends to be

underestimated, so the extent of read justments, particularly after

a long-continued boom such as we have had, tends to be underestimated.

The lack of liquidity in the economy could provide a terrific drag if

recession got underway.

At the last meeting of the Committee it

to him desirable that the bill rate

of the discount rate.

little

d

should be kept in the neighborhood

He felt now that the bill

below the discount rate.

see

rate might be moved a

If the situation eased naturally and

substantially by virtue of the failure of loans to go up, he would not

put any brakes on that easing.

He would let net borrowed reserves fall

where they will since they could be influenced by many factors, and he

doubted that the Committee should put on pressure because of a preconceived figure of net borrowed reserves.

He would buy the long bills

very freely if they had a tendency to go above the discount rate, and

if they tended to move below the discount rate, he would let them go.

In addition, the System might begin to consider re-establishment of

some moderate growth factor in the total factor of reserves.

Growth

11/12/57

-41-

had been so negligible recently as to be nonobservable and by the

end of the year may prove to have been a negative figure.

The

economy was trying to grow, and unless we allowed the reserves to

get out to permit growth, the Federal Reserve would eventually be

a party to producing economic convulsions.

Mr. Bryan said that if

any overt action were to be taken, he would like to see it done at

this time by reducing reserve requirements on savings deposits.

He

also would like to see the Committee's directive changed.

Mr. Johns said that he, too, had returned from vacation, but

being under the necessity of remaining at home he had been exposed

to a variety of reading, including the Dale article in the New York

Times, and perhaps his perspective had not been improved during his

vacation.

In preparing for this meeting, he reached conclusions

agreeing with the statements that had been made by Mr. Young to the

effect that a moderate downward adjustment in the econonomyhad been

occurring, that the evidences of psychological change were fairly

impressive, and that further moderate downward drift might be likely.

The Eighth District seemed to be contributing its share at least to

that kind of performance.

Manufacturing activity was down, employment

was not strong, department store sales were down, bank loans were

behaving about as in the country generally, and bank debits in October

certainly evidenced no great strength in economic activity.

Eighth

District agriculture tracked with the nation except for the recent

11/12/57

-42-

impairment of the cotton crop both as to quality and quantity.

In

only one factor was there evidence of strength--construction--and

even that strength was because of two major public housing projects

connected with Armed Forces installations.

Mr. Johns' conclusions on

the basis of his appraisal of the situation were that (1) a reduction

of the discount rate was indicated and that should take place very

soon; (2) through open market operations restrictions upon bank reserves should be moderated; and (3)

the Committee's directive should

be changed promptly.

Mr. Johns went on to say that perhaps there had been signs

some time ago of the change that might seem to have occurred recently.

He was inclined to think that the statistics were just now catching up

with the evidences which perhaps were not clearly seen but which were

perhaps divined as early as last August when the Federal Reserve was

assuming a rather strong posture with respect to restraint of inflation.

He felt that the adjustment of the discount rate in August had greater

significance than bringing it into line with the market structure; he

was inclined to agree with Mr. Riefler that that action was a clear

indication that the Federal Reserve did not intend to finance inflation.

At this time,

Mr. Johns thought the System should acquire a new posture

as Mr. Riefler had suggested.

He doubted, however, that the System

should move too quickly to reduce the discount rate by 1/2 per cent.

We have had a very long and very well advertised period of tight

11/12/57

-43-

money, he noted, which has engendered some apprehensiveness in the

minds of reasonable people.

Possibly a clearly announced but moderate

change in policy in the direction of less restraint would have a

salutary effect on public opinion and attitude.

Assurance that the

tight money policy would not overstay its welcome might be a very

healthy thing.

Therefore, Mr. Johns would lean in the direction of

a rather prompt reduction in the discount rate of 1/4 per cent.

He

noted that the directors of the St. Louis Bank met on Thursday of

this week, adding that he would not be able to argue strongly against

such a reduction.

With respect to open market operations, Mr. Johns said that he

believed that there should be observable moderation of restriction on

bank reserves.

directive.

claim as its

Also, there should be a change in the Committee's

He did not believe the directive should continue to procentral purpose the restraint of inflationary forces.

In commenting on this point, Mr. Johns suggested the desirability of

having the directive state in more specific terms than it has in the

past what the Committee expected in the way of operations in the open

market from the Manager of the System Open Market Account.

Specifically,

at this time he thought that the directive should tell the Manager quite

clearly that he should moderate the restrictiveness through operations

to increase the availability of bank reserves.

Chairman Martin interjected the comment that the directive was

the basis for the record of open market policy actions submitted to

11/12/57

-44-

the Congress.

Account, but it

It was not written only for the Manager of the System

was a public document.

The directive had a heritage

that had been built up over a period of many years.

This heritage

and the purposes served by the directive should not be confused with

the more detailed comments given in the minutes of the meetings to

help guide operations during the intervals between meetings.

The

Chairman pointed out that the nature of the directive must be considered in thinking of the relations between the Chairman and other

members of the Committee and the Congress.

While he did not believe

there was any major disagreement between the views he was expressing

and the thoughts Mr. Johns had in mind, he thought we should bear in

mind not only the drafting problem but the nature of the directive

that had been issued by the Committee in the past and which the Com-

mittee would be dealing with in the future.

Mr. Szymczak said that the problems of monetary policy were

similar to the problems of fiscal policy in that both were very difficult.

Monetary policy was much more flexible and therefore could

meet its situations much more readily than fiscal policy.

however, it

Even there,

was not always easy to adjust monetary policy to statistics

that became available late.

Mr. Szymczak agreed with Mr. Bryan that

there was not only the present situation to consider, but there was

the likelihood of another and different situation that might develop

over the longer run and take us into deficit financing.

At the

present time, Mr. Szymczak felt that the Comittee should decrease

11/12/57

-45-

to some extent the net borrowed reserves by supplying reserves

through the open market.

A move in this direction would be indi-

cated by net borrowed reserves in the $200-$250 million area.

He

also felt that the wording of the Committee's directive should be

changed so as to recognize the reduced inflationary pressures and

the increased uncertainties in the business situation, but he would

also have something in the directive to suggest that it still might

be necessary to fight inflation.

On the discount rate, if the Com-

mittee were to supply reserves it would become necessary to reduce

the discount rate because of the effect additional reserves would

have on market rates.

His own view was that discount rates should

be reduced as soon as possible and not by 1/4 per cent, but by 1/2

per cent.

Mr. Balderston said that, as he had remarked at the preceding

meeting, the economy seemed to him to have reached and probably to

have passed the peak of the boom.

This appeared to be the case not

only in this country but in Canada and in Western Continental Europe.

In attempting to avoid confusion in his mind between the psychological

and the real situation, he was basing his conclusions on indices of

production in foreign countries and in the United States, the fact

that electrical power consumption was dropping below its trend line,

the falling off in freight car loadings, and the decline in manhours

worked per week.

The Department of Labor had been making some studies

as to probable changes next year in unemployment, he noted, that

11/12/57

-46-

indicated a doubling of unemployment in 1958.

Mr.

Balderston said he would differ from Mr. Hayes,

not as to

the diagnosis of the situation, but as to the remedy to be applied.

He would not favor a change in reserve requirements or in margin re-

quirements because he thought the interpretation that would be placed

on such moves by the country would be that the System was favoring

Wall Street and forgetting Main Street.

moves might prove premature.

Moreover,

either of these

To dissipate any impression that the

Federal Reserve System was adamant and doctrinaire, Mr. Balderston

said that he would favor an immediate reduction in the discount rate,

the sooner the better, and he would make the reduction 1/2 of 1 per

cent.

A suitable target for net borrowed reserves would be around

$250 million.

He would change the directive with a simplified state-

ment of clause (b)

that would call for operations with a view "to

fostering economic growth that is sustainable."

If some qualification

seemed necessary, this could be supplemented with a statement such as

"and continuing to watch potential inflationary threats."

Chairman Martin said that he thought we had had another

extremely good go-around.

He certainly was not gloomy.

Excellent

progress had been made both in the System's public relations and in

its policy.

In his judgment, we had not yet licked the business cycle.

Any idea that we may have had at

the picture was mistaken.

was another question.

mes that the business cycle was out

How to relate that to the present situation

Chairman Martin said that he was not trying to

11/12/57

-47-

forecast the future, but as he saw the factors shaping up, and as he

tried to recognize forces as they were developing, private capital

formation had slowed up.

had in 1953 and 1954.

This was not the inventory problem that we

At this particular stage of the cycle,

the

slowing of private capital formation could have more dangerous

repercussions over a period of time than the country faced in 1953-54.

Turning to posture of the System, the Chairman recalled that

he had repeatedly pointed out that the System did not want a recession.

There might be differences of opinion on the emphasis to be placed

on this, but when inflation gets ahead of us, the unraveling process

becomes an extremely difficult one.

We in the System cannot assume

that our policies have been sound enough for people to take the position that we in no way contributed to the inflation by our policies.

We could not say that our policies had been sound enough and accurate

All

enough so that we had been completely on top of the situation.

of us know that the Federal Reserve cannot do more than minimize the

problems that are created by distortions such as we have had.

Chairman

Martin told of an incident that he had observed recently where a child

had gotten a bad burn, and when the doctor came, he reminded the

father of the burned child that this was not the time to rebuke or be

angry with the child: the immediate need was to apply all the remedies

there were to heal the burn.

In relating this incident to the System, the Chairman stressed

his belief that at this stage of economic developments, the important

11/12/57

-48-

thing was that the Federal Reserve have the correct posture.

a period of time,

he had felt that it

Over

would have been better if

System had put the discount rate up long before it

did.

the

However,

when we came to last August, there was no alternative but to move

the discount rate up as a recognition of a technical situation.

The

System should not now go off half-cocked, but even if it became necessary to reverse itself it should try to retain flexibility.

It would

be most unfortunate if the posture of the System at this time was one

that could give any credence to the view that the System now had an

"I-told-you-so" attitude.

The System should not claim credit at this

time for the decline that has occurred.

It

should not be saying that

this was a result of our policy and that we were glad this had come

about.

The Chairman said that he did not wish the foregoing remarks

to be misunderstood.

He believed that the adjustments now taking place

would prove to be salutary, and if the inflationary movement had gone

farther, the unraveling process would have been much more difficult.

He was directing these remarks to the public posture of the System.

It was important that the Committee bear in mind the System's posture

in terms of the public psychology and the political undertones and

overtones.

Although he had felt that the discount rate should have

gone up sooner than it did, he was glad that none of us could make

these decisions alone.

All parts of the System should pull together,

11/12/57

-49-

and there should be a synthesis of the various points of view until

they gradually were welded into a System view.

The tendency, however,

was too much toward the status quo at times.

As to present policy, Chairman Martin said that he would not

argue whether there should be a change immediately,

but if the discount

rate were to be changed, the System must recognize that the Treasury

planned to make a financing announcement later this week.

It was also

important that within the System there not be shilly-shallying with

posture.

The Chairman thought the present situation could be dis-

tinguished from that of 1953-54, and he doubted that there would now

be a resurgence of inflationary pressures such as we got at that time.

There was a tendency for all of us to like to fight a new war in the

same way as the last one,

but in this case he thought the readjustments

now taking place in the economy were likely to go on regardless of moves

on the monetary front.

There might be some speculative movements if

certain actions were taken by the System, but in the Chairman's judgment

we would be disappointed if we expected a repetition of the 1953-54

experience.

Noting that he had been a stock market speculator most of his

life until he got out of that business, Chairman Martin said that while

he did not think the stock market was an accurate reflector of business

trends, he did believe it

reflected the vagaries of the situation.

The

confidence factor had been permitted to get out of hand on the up side

in the expectation of inflation, and the expectation that nothing would

11/12/57

-50-

be done about it

had almost carried us over the dam on that side.

problem became more difficult when dealing with pessimism.

The

Chairman

Martin said that without placing any definite timing on the action, he

hoped that within the next six weeks the Federal Reserve would take an

overt action that would recognize the situation.

on the discount rate.

He would favor action

As Mr. Johns had pointed out, the move in August

from 3 per cent to 3-1/2 per cent came at the tail end of an upward move

in business.

That increase in the discount rate marked the posture of

the Federal Reserve in terms of psychology.

been some sharp changes.

Since then, there had

Business loans had declined during a five-week

period by $650 million, the first decline in such loans during October

in the postwar period.

In each of the past two years, these loans had

increased sharply in that month.

short time and it

This was a sharp swing in a very

needed to be watched.

There had been a suggestion

that the Committee supply reserves to the market, but there was a

problem in putting reserves into the money market when reserves were

being released by a decrease in loans.

the public has changed completely,

Even though the psychology of

the System does not want a sloppy

money market at a time of Treasury financing.

It should be very

cautious about getting a sloppy condition in the flow of funds.

This morning's discussion had pointed up the System's problem

very clearly, Chairman Martin said.

He aligned himself with the comments

11/12/57

-51-

of those favoring a moderate easing of pressures on reserves through

open market operations.

He, too, hesitated to put out any specific

figure of net borrowed reserves, but the figures mentioned by Mr. Hayes,

$100-$250 million, seemed as good as any,

the market had to be considered.

remembering that the feel of

The point was that a moderate easing

seemed appropriate, and all of us should be considering other actions

and their timing as the days go on.

Chairman Martin said that the more he thought of these problems,

the clearer it

became that no one of us could be certain he was right.

He liked the way the System goes about reaching policy decisions of this

type.

Sometimes the process was a lot slower than he liked, but some-

times we find out later that we are glad that it was slow.

At this

particular time, he felt the System should not minimize the public relations problem or the psychological problem of the public.

careful not to let anyone get the idea, if

We should be

the adjustments begin to

snowball, that the System is proud of Federal Reserve policies having

brought any such development about.

Neither should we permit anyone

to get the idea that the System was not going to do everything within

its power--and we recognize its powers are limited--to "bind up and heal

our wounds."

Chairman Martin then turned to the Committee's directive to be

issued to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, stating that it

appeared

that the majority view was that the directive should be changed along

the lines discussed.

There had been a number of suggestions for the

11/12/57

wording.

-52He reiterated his comment that the directive was a heritage

of the past, also stating that he did not care particularly about the

precise wording,

so long as it

indicated the Committee's posture and

was recognized as the basis for the record of policy actions.

There followed considerable discussion of the wording of

clause (b) of the first paragraph of the directive, in the course of

which numerous suggestions were made and considered.

discussion, Mr.

During this

Shepardson reverted to Chairman Martin's illustration

of the child with a burned hand and the need for applying all the

remedies there were to heal the burn.

mind a different analogy.

country.

Mr. Shepardson said he had in

There had been a wave of "flu" over the

In some of these serious epidemics,

the great danger was

in getting up too quickly and risking a relapse.

Shepardson felt

In this case, Mr.

that we had reduced the fever but he questioned

whether we were quite ready to let the patient get on his feet and

start running again.

Chairman Martin responded that this was a very well takem com-

ment and that this was where the element of judgment was involved.

At the conclusion of the discussion,

it was agreed (Mr.

Robertson dissenting) that clause (b) should be changed by deleting

the provision that had been carried in the directive since the meeting

on March 5, 1957, which called for open market operations with a view,

among other things,

"to restraining inflationary developments in the

interest of sustainable economic growth while recognizing uncertainties in the business outlook, the financial markets, and the

11/12/57

-53-

international situation," and that this should be replaced by a clause

which called for operations with a view, among other things, "to

fostering sustainable growth in the economy without inflation, by

moderating the pressures on bank reserves."

In response to Chairman Martin's request for comments, Mr.

Rouse stated that he thought the discussion had clearly indicated

the desires of the Committee and what was meant by the suggested new

wording of clause (b) of the directive.

Mr. Rouse also commented

briefly on the outlook for bank reserves during the next few weeks.

Thereupon, upon motion duly made and

seconded, the Committee voted to direct

the Federal Reserve Bank of New York until

otherwise directed by the Committee:

(1) To make such purchases, sales, or exchanges (including replacement of maturing securities, and allowing

maturities to run off without replacement) for the System

open market account in the open market or, in the case of

maturing securities, by direct exchange with the Treasury,

as may be necessary in the light of current and prospective

economic conditions and the general credit situation of the

country, with a view (a) to relating the supply of funds in

the market to the needs of commerce and business, (b) to

fostering sustainable growth inthe economy without inflation, by moderating the pressures on bank reserves, and

(c) to the practical administration of the account; provided that the aggregate amount of securities held in the

System account (including commitments for the purchase or

sale of securities for the account) at the close of this

date, other than special short-term certificates of indebtedness purchased from time to time for the temporary

accommodation of the Treasury, shall not be increased or

decreased by more than $1 billion;

To purchase direct from the Treasury for the

(2)

account of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (with

seems desirable, to issue

discretion, in cases where it

participations to one or more Federal Reserve Banks) such

amounts of special short-term certificates of indebtedness

as may be necessary from time to time for the temporary

accommodation of the Treasury; provided that the total

amount of such certificates held at any one time by the

Federal Reserve Banks shall not exceed in the aggregate

$500 million;

(3) To sell direct to the Treasury from the System

account for gold certificates such amounts of Treasury

securities maturing within one year as may be necessary

from time to time for the accommodation of the Treasury;

provided that the total amount of such securities so sold

shall not exceed in the aggregate $500 million face amount,

and such sales shall be made as nearly as may be practicable

at the prices currently quoted in the open market.

Votes for this action: Messrs.

Martin, Chairman, Hayes, Vice Chairman,

Allen, Balderston, Bryan, Leedy,

Shepardson, Szymczak, and Williams.

Vote against this action: Mr.

Robertson.

Mr. Robertson dissented from the

foregoing action with regard to the in-

sertion in paragraph (1) (b) of the

clause, "by moderating the pressures on

bank reserves." His action was based

on the belief that the prevailing

condition of the economy was not such

as to call for a lessening of restraint,

that inflationary potentials were still

strong, and that continued restraint was

essential to its containment.

Mr. Johns stated that he was not clear as to what, if any consensus there had been regarding action on the discount rate.

Chairman Martin stated that he doubted there had been a con-

sensus.

His view was that whenever an announcement of a change in the

rate was made, it must be carefully thought of in relation to the

forthcoming Treasury financing.

He did not think we should be in the

11/12/57

-55-

position of having the Treasury open its books on a new offering

and, in the midst of that, having the System make a change in the

discount rate.

This was a problem that had to be worked out.

Mr. Hayes said that in suggesting consideration of a change

in reserve requirements at central reserve cities, he did not mean

to indicate that a reduction should be made immediately.

He felt

that it should, however, continue to have serious consideration.

Chairman Martin agreed that this was a subject that appropriately should be raised for consideration. He reiterated that

each of us should feel perfectly free to present suggestions or

ideas having to do with any aspect of monetary policy.

This was

not a matter of Board prerogative, or bank prerogative, or Committee

prerogative, and these meetings should be looked upon as a clearing

house for System policy discussion.

In concluding the meeting, the Chairman commented that every

person in the room should remember that he had a special responsibility

to see that what had transpired here was not permitted to get into the

press.

It was agreed that the next meeting of the Committee should be

scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 3, 1957, and attention

was called to the fact that because of the holiday season it was likely

that the following meeting of the Committee might be held on Tuesday,

December 17, with the meeting after that to be held three weeks later,

-56

11/12/57

on Tuesday, January 7, 1958.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (1957, November 11). FOMC Minutes. Fomc Minutes, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/fomc_minutes_19571112
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_fomc_minutes_19571112,
  author = {Federal Reserve},
  title = {FOMC Minutes},
  year = {1957},
  month = {Nov},
  howpublished = {Fomc Minutes, Federal Reserve},
  url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/fomc_minutes_19571112},
  note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}