fomc minutes · December 15, 1958

FOMC Minutes

A meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee was held in

the offices of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

in Washington on Tuesday, December 16, 1958,

PRESENT:

Mr.

Mr.

at 10:00 a.m.

Martin, Chairman 1/

Hayes, Vice Chairman 2/

Mr. Fulton

Mr.

Mr.

Irons

Leach

Mr . Mangels

Mr. Mills

Mr. Robertson

Mr. Shepardson

Mr. Szymczak

Messrs. Erickson, Allen, Johns, and Deming, Alter

nate Members of the Federal Open Market Committee

Messrs. Bopp, Bryan, and Leedy, Presidents of the

Federal Reserve Banks of Philadelphia, Atlanta,

and Kansas City, respectively

Mr. Riefler, Secretary

Mr. Thurston, Assistant Secretary

Mr. Sherman, Assistant Secretary

Mr. Hackley, General Counsel

Mr. Solomon, Assistant General Counsel

Mr. Thomas, Economist

Messrs. Daane, Hostetler, Marget, and Young,

Associate Economists

Mr. Rouse, Manager, System Open Market Account

Mr. Kenyon, Assistant Secretary, Board of

Governors

Mr. Molony, Special Assistant to the Board of

Governors

Mr. Koch, Associate Adviser, Division of

Research and Statistics, Board of Governors

Mr.

Keir, Acting Chief, Government Finance Section,

Division of Research and Statistics, Board of

Governors

Messrs. Ellis, Jones, Tow, and Rice, Vice Presidents

of the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston, St.

Louis, Kansas City, and Dallas, respectively

1/

2/

Entered meeting at point indicated in minutes.

part of meeting.

Presided during first

12/16/58

Messrs.

Coombs,

Baughman, and Einzig,

Assistant Vice Presidents of the

Federal Reserve Banks of New York,

Chicago, and San Francisco, respectively

Mr. Gaines, Manager, Securities Department,

Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Messrs. Anderson and Atkinson, Economic

Advisers, Federal Reserve Banks of

Philadelphia and Atlanta, respectively

Mr. Parsons, Director of Research, Federal

Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Before this meeting there had been distributed to the members

of the Committee a report prepared at the Federal Reserve Bank of New

York covering open market operations during the period December 2

through December 10, 1958, and a supplemental report covering the period

December 11 through December 15,

placed in

1958.

Copies of both reports have been

the files of the Federal Open Market Committee.

Mr. Rouse reported that the usual seasonal liquidation by corpora

tions had resulted in

that bill

rates in

some pressure on Treasury bills, with the result

the auction on Monday,

December 15, were up 10 basis

points from the previous week on the three-month bills and one basis

point on the six-month bills.

He added that the new six-month bills ap

peared to have been well accepted on the basis of the first

The first

two auctions.

auction required a fair amount of underwriting by dealers, but

the preliminary statistics for the second auction suggested that this

underwriting had been reduced.

In the money market, the period since the last meeting had been

characterized by corporate preparations for dividend and tax payments.

-3

12/16/58

The flow of money into New York prior to the December 10 dividend rate

created easy money market conditions for a few days,

10 the money market had been quite tight.

with the reserve projections in

but since December

The principal difficulty

the past two weeks had been in the

management of the Treasury's balance, which had tended to run lower

than expected.

however, it

Large calls had been made on the "C" depositary banks;

had sometimes not been feasible to call enough money from

these banks to bring the balance up to customary levels.

Mr.

Rouse con

cluded, with respect to the money market, that there probably had been

somewhat less pressure this year than during most previous years at

this season.

Mr.

Rouse said that additional reserves would have to be provided

during the balance of 1958 to offset seasonal currency withdrawals and

other influences on reserves, but that in

his judgment it

should be

possible to do most of this job through repurchase agreements.

he planned to intersperse one outright operation in

However,

Treasury bills and

to use this occasion to purchase some of the new six-month bills.

The

market generally understood that the System Account would buy and sell

these bills, but an actual operation in them would help to confirm this

understanding.

With respect to Treasury financing, Mr. Rouse reported that the

Treasury was planning to announce the terms of its

January 8,

cash offering on

with subscription books opened on January 12.

He added that

12/16/58

-4

he had no further details on what the Treasury planned to offer but

that he had mentioned the timing since this might be a matter that

would influence discussion during this meeting.

At the conclusion of Mr.

Rouse's report, Mr.

Shepardson said

that although he had no criticism of the conduct of open market opera

tions, he had thought that reserve positions would be tighter than they

actually turned out to be.

He asked whether the projections had gone

astray.

Mr.

projections.

Rouse replied that there had been sizable errors in

In fact, however,

the

he had given principal attention to

market atmosphere rather than reserve figures,

and the atmosphere in

the money market on most days had been about as tight as the Committee

would have wished.

The principal reason for the easier than expected

reserve figures was the tendency for the Treasury balance to fall

below estimates; the Treasury hesitated to call enough money from the

"C" depositary banks to pull its

Mr.

balance up.

Thomas noted that the Treasury's balance on the previous

day had risen to above $4OO million, considerably higher than expected,

so that the reserve figures for the current statement week would be

lower than shown in

the New York projections.

had been revised upward,

reserve figures.

Also,

required reserves

and that would have an influence on the

12/16/58

-5Thereupon, upon motion duly made and

seconded, and by unanimous vote, the open

market transactions during the period

December 2 through December 15, 1958, were

approved, ratified, and confirmed.

In supplementation of the staff memorandum distributed under

date of December 12, 1958, Mr.

Young made the following statement on

the economic situations

If one takes a cyclical frame of reference for evaluat

ing the economy's performance since the low of last April,

the conclusion reached is that the performance has been

remarkably good.

Gross national product, personal income,

retail trade, residential construction activity, manufacturers'

new orders, industrial production, freight carloadings, and

various other economic indicators have increased about as

much in the past seven months as in corresponding seven-month

periods of cyclical recoveries following earlier postwar

contractions.

Recent recession was somewhat deeper than in the preceding

two declines.

On the other hand, for brevity and the speed of

turn-around to recovery, performance this time has been front

rank both as compared with postwar and with prewar cycles.

While peak levels of activity have not been reattained, they

are now so close at hand that one can view the approaching

period as likely to be characterized by resumed economic

expansion.

To highlight the current cyclical position:

1.

In the present quarter, gross national product in

current dollars is estimated to reach a new record annual

rate of $452 billion. The physical volume of goods and

services output is probably within less than one per cent of

the earlier high.

The increase in GNP from the spring low of about $27

billion, or about 6 per cent, reflects widespread strength.

Consumer spending has moved up on a broad front; combined

Government outlays for all purposes have increased to a new

postwar high; and the sharpest inventory liquidation of the

postwar period has about reached an end.

2.

By midyear, business fixed investment had stabilized,

following a pronounced cyclical decline, and has risen

Past cyclical experience suggests that renewal

modestly since.

of business investment expansion will tend to gather momentum

12/16/58

slowly.

Such outlays typically lag behind recovery else

where, but after a period they join the upswing.

Already

output in business equipment lines is a tenth above its

low and last month private industrial construction rose

for the first

time in 15 months.

Other fixed investment, as reflected in new construction,

is now up over an eighth from the recession low reached in May.

This is a little

better than in preceding postwar cycles, for

the decline in this cycle was greater.

Incidentally, private

housing starts for November, at 1.3 million units annual rate,

were up two-fifths from the spring low, with the pattern of

upswing closely paralleling the 1949-50 and 1954-55 recoveries.

3.

Early resumption of advance in consumer spending,

after only a slight hesitation, has been associated with prompt

recovery in personal income.

Near stability of personal in

come during recession has been a notable feature of the three

postwar cycles--a feature contrasting strikingly with the

pattern of consumer income fluctuation in prewar cycles.

This

year, income payments under Government unemployment and other

special security programs were considerably increased, con

tributing to upturn in personal income in March ahead of other

major economic indicators.

In response to the maintenance of

consumer income, retail buying has risen in this cycle about

This is about par

7 per cent, after declining 5 per cent.

performance for postwar cycles.

Large-scale production of 1959 model autos is finally

4.

under way, and recovery in industrial production in November

few months

and December is showing nearly the speed of the first

The industrial production index in Novem

after the April low.

ber was put at l4l and the December figure is expected to be

The rise since April in

one or two index points higher.

industrial production is close to the experience of earlier

postwar cycles, despite a larger decline in this cyclical

Nondurable goods

recession than in both of the earlier ones.

have made an especially good showing in this recovery period.

On the other hand, output and the rate of capacity utilization

for metals are lower now than at the corresponding points in

New orders for metal products and

earlier postwar cycles.

other durable goods, however, have shown as strong a rise

through October as in the 1954-55 and 1949-50 recovery periods.

5. About as many major industries have contributed to

the rise in nonagricultural employment in this recovery period

as in the earlier postwar cycles, but the over-all gain in

Manufacturing employment

employment has been somewhat smaller.

has lagged more this time relative to output, because of an

12/16/58

-7-

indicated sharper rise in output per manhour.

Moreover,

nonmanufacturing employment has shown somewhat slower

recovery.

In past cycles, the increase in employment

and the decline in unemployment has gained momentum as

the period of output recovery shaded into the later,

expansionary phase of the cycle.

6.

In the 1948-9 recession, industrial commodity

prices declined fairly sharply, but in the two following

recessions were modest. Increases in average industrial

prices for seven months following the troughs have been

roughly equivalent, with most of the rise being accounted

for by recovery in material prices.

In all three recoveries,

reports of markups on fabricated goods prices were appearing

with increasing frequency after seven months.

7.

Cyclical developments are usually anticipated by the

stock market, and this time the rise is about par compared

with the two preceding cycles.

Of course, the percentage

rise is a wholly mechanical basis of analysis. This time the

beginning level for the rise was high relatively, for yields

on stocks were only slightly lower than yields on bonds of

the same companies.

Now, stock yields are well below bond

yields, a condition not reached in the first postwar cycle

and only reached late in the second cycle.

8.

Economic recovery has been aided by a pronounced

growth in the money supply this year, at a somewhat faster

rate than in the last cycle. Comparison here with the 1949-50

recovery period is inappropriate since flexible monetary policy

Since January of this year,

was not operative in this cycle.

the amount of expansion sums up to a 4 per cent annual rate.

The money supply is now about 3 per cent above last year at

this time.

In preceding postwar recessions and recoveries, United

9.

States exports showed only modest downturn and revival, while

In this cycle, United States

imports were about maintained.

prior to recession, declined

receding

been

exports, which had

Recently,

again maintained.

were

imports

though

more sharply,

exports continue to lag, but scattered indications in leading

countries abroad suggest that strengthening markets may be

ahead. Meanwhile, United States imports have risen significantly.

As a concluding point of diagnosis, one may ask what might

be expected on the basis of normal cyclical developments over

In other words, what kind of performance might

the year ahead.

the economy experience if conformity with the broad contours of

past cyclical patterns continues to work out?

12/16/58

-8-

Without endeavoring a forecast or a projection, at

least this specific an answer can be offered on historical

cycle grounds. By midyear, industrial production might

reach an index level of 150, and by year-end it might attain

155. By year-end, GNP in constant dollars might reach $485

billion, up 7 per cent from present levels.

These figures abstract from inflationary potentials,

which have been much stressed in recent staff reports to the

Committee. From a purely cyclical standpoint, if the economy

has overshot the mark in inventory liquidation, in business

investment contraction, and in export sales, a condition of

cyclical inflationary pressures can quickly be generated.

Domestic and foreign purchasing agents coming to market in

a catching-up mood can afford to bid actively against one

another while suppliers can afford to become more and more

reluctant in offerings. Inflationary psychology, already

generated in financial markets, can spread to commodity and

service markets at wholesale and thence to retail markets.

It cannot be said that this will happen, but it is enough

of a potential to constitue a problem for the Committee

in its moulding of a financial climate for the period of

economic expansion in prospect. If it does happen, there

could well result a decided lag in expansion of real output

and employment and a higher rate of unemployment than would

otherwise be expected to occur.

Mr. Thomas made the following statement with respect to the credit

situation:

Money and credit markets have operated with surprising

smoothness in the past month in the face of the vigorous

progress of economic recovery, the rather heavy financing

operations of the Treasury, the liquidity demands customary

at this season of the year, and a moderate tightening of

bank reserve positions. Interest rates have fluctuated

moderately, close to or below the high levels reached earlier.

In the past two or three weeks rates have firmed somewhat,

but so far increases have not been as great as customarily

occur in December.

Additional offers of Treasury bills have so far been

taken by the market without severe pressures. City banks

have actually reduced their holdings of bills in the past

two weeks. It appears that businesses continue to have

adequate liquidity to meet their needs with only moderate

borrowing at banks and have even been able to acquire Treasury

bills.

12/16/58

In the first two weeks of December, preliminary and

partial figures for city banks indicate that loans increased

somewhat less than in the corresponding weeks of the two

previous years and that holdings of Government securities

were considerably reduced. As a result total loans and in

vestments declined somewhat in contrast to increases in

December 1957 and 1956.

In capital markets, the volume of new issues has been

somewhat smaller in the fourth quarter than in previous

quarters.

Offerings of corporate issues have been larger in

December than in November, but less than a year ago.

Flota

tions of State and local governments remain at a relatively

low level. The slackening of these demands may have ac

counted for the absence of more severe pressures in the market.

Home mortgage markets, however, continue to tighten. The stock

market has continued strong with active trading.

Does the absence of severe pressures on the money market

mean that cyclical and seasonal adjustments are being met with

unusual smoothness through the processes of the market without

undue expansion or contraction? Or is it that demand and supply

factors have not yet caught up with the sharp rise in rates

that developed earlier in part on the basis of anticipations?

That is, in the jargon of the market, had the current develop

ments already been discounted? Or has the current posture of

monetary policy been so easy as to permit these adjustments to

be made without strain?

It has often been noted recently that market interest

rates are unusually high in relation to the existing level of

free reserves and the discount rate. Long-term rates are close

to or above the highest levels of the 1957 period of strong

capital demands. With member bank borrowing generally less

than $500 million, short-term rates are as high as when

borrowings were close to $1 billion. In fact they are higher

relative to the discount rate.

Banks would find it profitable to expand credit even if

they had to borrow. Has bank credit not expanded or has there

been an expansion based on reserves supplied by System open

market operations, so that banks did not need to increase

borrowings?

In the first half of the year, when reserves were freely

available, total loans and investments of member banks ex

panded sharply. The bulk of the increase was at city banks.

Country banks, partly for seasonal reasons, showed only a

Since midyear,

moderate increase, as did nonmember banks.

when the availability of reserves has been more restricted,

12/16/58

-10-

until the end of November, New York City banks showed a sub

stantial decline in their total loans and investments, and

those of reserve city banks increased only slightly. In

contrast, country banks expanded by much larger amounts than

in the same period of the two previous years.

As a result total bank credit has shown a further expan

sion of a greater than seasonal amount.

Most of the increase

occurred in holdings of U. S. Government securities at country

banks. Total loans showed little

change compared with a small

decrease in the same period last year and a substantial in

crease in 1956. Country bank loans have increased this year

while those at city banks decreased, due principally to a

decline in security loans from the high June level.

The 1956

increase in loans was mostly at city banks.

Figures that have just become available for November again

show that country banks account for a substantial portion of the

increase in bank loans and investments in that month, although

city banks also showed some increase.

The net result of all these changes on bank deposits is of

significance from the standpoint of monetary policy.

Since June,

the money supply seasonally adjusted has increased by over $3

billion, which is at an annual rate of over 5 per cent.

Two

thirds of this increase occurred in July, followed by partially

offsetting decreases in August and September and renewed expan

sion in October and November.

On almost any basis of comparison

the rate of growth has exceeded 3 per cent a year. The time

deposit growth, which was so rapid in the first

half of the year,

has slackened in recent months and there were declines in Novem

ber at all classes of banks.

In the first

two weeks of December demand deposits adjusted

at city banks increased by about $1-1/4 billion. A sharp in

crease is usual in that period, as deposits are built up for

payments of taxes and dividends and for other purposes, and this

year's increase is not any larger than usual.

By classes of banks, it would appear that privately-owned

demand deposits have increased substantially at reserve city banks

and at country banks since midyear, with little

growth at central

U. S. Government deposits, which were ex

reserve city banks.

ceptionally large at city banks at the end of June, have accounted

This analysis

for the decline in total deposits at city banks.

would seem to indicate that the increased stock of money built

half of the year, largely through expansion of

up in the first

Government security holdings at city banks, has become more

widely distributed around the country, partly through Government

Further expansion

spending of the proceeds of its borrowings.

has occurred in the second half-year on the basis of greater

than seasonal credit growth at country banks.

12/16/58

-11-

Reserves to provide the basis for this credit have been

largely supplied through System open market operations since

August, as free reserves have shown little

change since that

time.

Free reserves declined sharply in August, stayed close

to $100 million from early September to mid-November, and

have declined a little since then. Since the bulk of the

expansion has been at country banks, reserve needs have not

been as great as they would have been had the growth been at

city banks.

It also means that, for operating purposes, cur

rent estimates of required reserves have tended to understate

the growth.

Current estimates of bank reserve positions are now being

revised again on the basis of country bank figures for the last

half of November that have just been received.

Required re

serves are about $40 million larger than had been previously

estimated.

This means that member banks have had a net borrowed

reserve position during most of the past four weeks.

They are

likely to show moderate net borrowed reserves this week and

next.

A sharp increase in borrowings will occur in the last

week of the month, unless System operations supply about $500

million of reserves.

These needs may be met largely, if not

entirely, through repurchase contracts. After the turn of the

year, reserves will need to be absorbed at a rapid rate--perhaps

as much as $1 billion in January.

These estimates allow for a large return flow of currency

in January to offset the greater than seasonal expansion that

has occurred in recent weeks. They also allow for usual

seasonal changes in deposits and required reserves, and like

wise in float. A continued gold outflow at an average of $25

No special allowance is made for

million a week is assumed.

the

increase in the weekly bill

through

financing

Treasury

offering, as it is assumed that these funds will be promptly

expended by the Treasury and enter into the general flow of

This would require no build-up of deposits greater

funds.

On a seasonal basis, deposits

than would otherwise be needed.

and required reserves should decline considerably in January

and February.

Mr.

Hayes then made the following statement of his views on the

business outlook and credit policy:

It seems to me that this is an appropriate time for us

to take very careful stock of what the System's general

approach--or "posture", if you will--should be at this stage

I think we are all agreed on our

of the business cycle.

general objective, which might be described as facilitating

12/16/58

-12-

orderly progress toward fuller utilization of our productive

capacity and manpower and the renewed growth of the economy

at a sustainable rate. During the past several months, I

think that our policies have helped the economy to move towards

that objective.

But I left the last meeting of the Committee

somewhat disturbed by references to the need for a policy of

further restraint.

In my opinion, such a move would be pre

mature at this stage of recovery.

I am particularly disturbed

by the possibility that a downward drift of free reserves sub

stantially into the negative range, or a discount rate increase,

might suggest to the public a policy of progressive tightening

and set off an exaggerated market reaction.

I would like to direct my remarks to two aspects of the

situation: (1) whether a policy of further credit restraint

would be consistent with our current directive; and (2) whether

such a policy would be well attuned to the actualities of

present business and credit conditions.

First, as to the directive: We describe our goal in the

directive as "balanced economic recovery." The "balanced" of

course implies among other things that recovery should be free

from price distortions, although that is not stated explicitly.

But the explicit word "recovery" seems to me to indicate to any

concern is with the achievement of fuller

reader that our first

If we feel that we should be at

resources.

nation's

use of the

least equally concerned, or possibly even more concerned, with

a developing threat of inflation and should make a major effort

to prevent it by credit restraint, we should, I think, make the

record clear on this point.

Second, we have the question whether a restrictive credit

policy would be well attuned to current economic conditions.

I think we can agree that, when it became evident that recovery

was well under way, a shift away from a policy of active ease

was appropriate. The main question then concerned the timing

and rapidity of the shift, in view of the highly disturbed

market conditions that prevailed in the summer. But traditionally

a restrictive monetary policy has been applied only when there

were developments in the credit situation that called for

restraint.

If we believe that there is a long-term inflationary bias

in the economy regardless of whether business is prospering or

ailing, I submit that we should not conclude either that monetary

policy alone can solve this problem or that it should be focused

so strongly on this problem as to run serious risks of itself

preventing adequate use of resources.

In our Bank, we have used the past two-week period to review

very carefully our thinking as to current forces and trends in

12/16/58

-13-

the economy. It is, of course, entirely possible that the

recovery may gain such momentum as to encourage speculative

inventory policies and excessive credit expansion or other

distortions. We can, however, see nothing at present to

suggest such an acceleration of activity and a renewal of

inflationary demand pressures.

Consumer demand is good but

not ebullient, prospects of a strong upsurge are remote,

and businessmen are conservative in their ordering and in

ventory policies, as well as in their spending for fixed

capital. Business investment in fixed plant and equipment

was lower than expected in the third quarter, and only a

very modest rise is in prospect after the turn of the year.

The meaning of recent data indicating a considerable drop

in unemployment is somewhat obscured by the apparent de

parture of a sizeable number of workers from the labor force

and seasonal adjustment problems.

The biggest question mark

in the business outlook relates to the automobile industry,

and it will be six weeks or more before we can really appraise

reception of the new models. The current high production rate,

designed partly to replenish inventories, and the rise in sales

that accompanied the buildup in dealer stocks, still

give no

clear indication of the sales outlook.

As for prices, the evidence of some continued balance

during this phase of the recovery is reflected in free market

prices during the last two weeks. The very sensitive index of

waste and scrap prices has turned down, and raw materials in

the daily sensitive commodity price index have now followed

While finished goods prices

the downturn for farm products.

continue to reflect upward pressures, the latter are less pro

nounced than in recent months, and approximate over-all price

appears to be in prospect for some months

stability still

ahead.

Conditions in the credit and capital markets likewise

yield no argument for restraint. The capital markets continue

to operate without any undue pressure and the stock market

seems to have lost some of its ebullience temporarily at least.

The backlog of new bond issues is somewhat smaller than it has

been in recent months, whereas equity financing has increased

somewhat. In the credit area, the most valid cause for appre

hension would seem to be the possibility that too much liquidity

Yet I am

may have been injected into the economy in 1958.

impressed by the fact that the liquidity of the banks is well

below the summer's peak and even further below the 1954 leveland that the increase in money supply for the year as a whole

does not appear excessive. While we must be watchful to prevent

12/16/58

-14-

the banks from feeling too free to add to their investments,

we must also be careful to see that they remain well able to

take care of all legitimate business requirements.

The very real effort now being made to achieve something

approaching a balanced Federal budget for the next fiscal year

is ground for hope of much reduced pressure from this quarter

for excessive credit expansion.

As we consider immediate policy questions, we should bear

in mind that the year-end period is normally one of rising

pressures in the short-term money markets. Thus short-term

interest rates may be expected to rise for a time even with no

change in System policy. The markets will most likely take

such rate increases in stride, as a matter of seasonal routine,

unless there should appear to be some change in System policy

during this normal period of stress. Wholly inavertent factors

prevented our reporting net borrowed reserves last week, on

average, although the Desk had been aiming in this direction

in accordance with the consensus of our last meeting. (This

was written before I had seen the latest figures.) I think this

turn of events may prove to have been fortunate for the System,

in view of the possible effects of general recognition, at this

time, of a change of policy. The System is in an unusually

good position this year to indicate the temporary nature of the

reserves supplied to meet year-end pressures, remaining needs

being of a magnitude which can be provided in large part through

repurchase agreements.

Aside from general economic considerations, another reason

for continuing present credit policy unchanged is the Treasury's

need to borrow about $2 billion sometime during January and to

borrow additional cash through the new cycle of six-month bills.

The January Treasury offering appears to be the best opportunity,

for some time to come, for including a long-term issue, in view

of recent market stability and the traditional availability of

I believe success

investment funds after the turn of the year.

ful issuance of a long-term Treasury obligation at this time in

a moderate amount could have useful effects in the way of dampen

lingers in some areas.

ing the inflation psychology which still

It would seem unwise to jeopardize this chance with disturbing

policy changes on the part of the System in the next few weeks.

To me, all of these factors argue conclusively for maintain

ing the status quo in open market policy (year-end reserve needs

being provided without change in the present degree of pressure).

For the same reasons I think there should be no change in the

discount rate nor in the directive--subject, of course, to the

policy decided upon by the Committee and to my earlier comments

on the latter point.

12/16/58

-15

Mr.

Erickson stated that First District conditions were good

but did not seem to have the vigor indicated nationally by the staff

memorandum.

In November,

the New England index of manufacturing pro

duction failed to rise above the October level due to a slower rate

of recovery in durable goods industries, while the most recent poll

of purchasing agents showed,

for the first

time since June, a smaller

percentage of respondents expecting an increase in production beyond

the previous month.

August and September,

Construction contracts were at high levels in

but in October they were only one per cent ahead

of last year, with no large contract awards.

Residential construction

was up in October, but by a much smaller percentage than nationally.

Nonagricultural employment was down .2 per cent in

ber, due primarily to seasonal trends in

industries.

October from Septem

some of the nonmanufacturing

Electric power output, which each week since the middle

of the year had exceeded the corresponding week of the preceding year,

again exceeded the year-ago figure in the first

meant that in

as a whole.

week of December, which

this respect the district was doing better than the nation

In the first week of December, department store sales were

lower than in the corresponding week last year, the second time since

the middle of the year that this had happened.

Last year's good

Christmas business was attributable to sales volume in the last week

before Christmas; this year the district would have to do even better

to exceed the previous year because to date the figures were lower

12/16/58

-16

than for 1957.

In October,

new car registrations in most of the

States of the district were still

running 25 per cent less than

last year.

A survey of 168 lending institutions, covering all types

of lenders,

indicated that extensions of credit in

October were 9.6

per cent less than a year earlier.

Turning to policy for the next three weeks,

that in

Mr.

Erickson said

view of the pressures of the year end and the indication of a

Treasury financing announcement shortly after the beginning of next

year,

he would favor no change in

directive.

tained as in

the discount rate or in

the policy

He would like to see the same degree of restraint main

the past few days, with modest negative free reserves.

He hoped that any necessary reserves could be put into the market

through the use of repurchase agreements.

Mr.

Irons said that his appraisal of the economic situation

pointed toward continuing strength, and development of further strength,

both in the nation and in the Eleventh District.

strength was broadly based, being reflected in

including production, sales,

Perhaps the point was here,

retail

As he saw it,

the

a large number of areas

trade, and the inventory situation.

or at least near at hand, where one could

cease to use the word "recovery."

Eleventh District conditions were strong, Mr. Irons said.

Although department store sales had been affected somewhat by low

temperatures, he felt that they would pick up by Christmas, and the

tone generally was one of optimism.

to be good.

Construction activity continued

12/16/58

-17

On the financial side, Mr.

Irons observed that there had been

an increase in bank credit and a further increase in the money supply,

together with what appeared to him to be comparatively comfortable

reserve availability conditions.

outside the major cities.

shown increases in

A strong credit growth was noted

Both bank credit and bank deposits had

the Eleventh District, and for reasons not entirely

clear to him there had been a substantial and steady increase in cur

rency in

circulation for the past couple of months, with the totals

moving up to record highs.

The Dallas Bank, Mr.

Irons noted, was the

only Reserve Bank whose Federal Reserve note circulation was less than

its

member bank reserve deposits.

District banks,

The reserve position of Eleventh

as reflected by borrowing at the Reserve Bank, appeared

to be fairly comfortable,

with no appreciable discounting by either

city or country banks.

As to policy, Mr.

Irons saw a number of problems in

the picture,

including the Treasury financing early in January and the refunding

scheduled for early February.

He would like to see reserve availability

move to the negative side and stay there, for in his opinion negative

free reserves would be appropriate under the circumstances in which the

Federal Reserve was now operating.

amount of negative free reserves,

He was not thinking of a substantial

but more in terms of zero to minus

$100 million during the ensuing period.

Fluctuations within that

negative range seemed to him more appropriate than on the positive side.

12/16/58

-18

Also, he thought the Manager of the Account during the next period

should rely more on the feel of the market than on reserve projections;

that is,

to be sensitive to the feel of the market.

If

that should

cause the reserve figures to go awry for a day or so, this could be

offset by operations on a cash basis.

In substance,

he would hold a

more continuous and firm restraint on the side of negative free re

serves, with short-term rates permitted to remain at about current

levels.

It would not disturb him if

the bill

rate were to rise.

He

doubted whether the discount rate was actually as much out of line as

the figures would seem to indicate.

Other things being equal, con

sideration might be given to the discount rate level at some time in

the quite near future.

the point,

As to the directive,

he felt this might be

or nearly so, when a change in wording would be in

so as to move a little

order

away from the concept of recovery and recognize

the existence of other problems.

Mr.

Mangels reported that there had not been major changes in

the Twelfth District in the past two weeks.

reported in

Contrary to the situation

the First District, retail stores were quite enthusiastic

about the volume of Christmas trade, which was running six per cent

ahead of 1957.

Employment in defense-related industries showed a

small increase in November, reflecting a continuing trend, while un

employment was showing less than the usual seasonal rise for this time

of the year.

Steel production had improved somewhat, with mills

12/16/58

-19.

operating at 75 to 80 per cent of capacity, the highest rates for

the year.

Production of copper and aluminum also was up, while

lumber was down a little.

Freight carloadings for the first

quarter

of 1959 were expected to increase around 12 per cent over the first

quarter of 1958,

nominal,

in

Member bank borrowings from the Reserve Bank were

but purchases in

the Federal funds market had been greatly

excess of sales.

Mr. Mangels said it

seemed evident that recovery was progres

sing at a moderate pace, with indications that it

would continue to

progress moderately without too much immediate inflationary pressure,

at least until such time as productive capacity and the labor force

were utilized more fully.

Prices had been reasonably steady and any

increase was likely to result from sources other than changes in the

money supply.

While the System should not furnish fuel for the fire,

he would not want to exert such a degree of restraint as to discourage

the progress of recovery.

In the ensuing period, free reserves around

the zero level might be appropriate--perhaps a little more or a little

less--with the Manager of the Account authorized to use his discretion

on the basis of the feel of the market.

Mr. Mangels said that he

would not favor changing the discount rate at present, at least during

the next three-week period, and he saw no occasion to change the

directive.

Mr. Deming said that the Ninth District was presently going

through a sharp seasonal contraction in

activity but that the general

12/16/58

-20

recovery trend seemed to be continuing at a moderate rate.

The

employment authorities were estimating the seasonal decline in

employment to mid-January to be smaller than usual, reflecting a

pickup in

durable goods manufacturing.

At the same time,

initial

unemployment claims in late November and early December were running

about one per cent ahead of last year.

The Minneapolis Reserve Bank, Mr. Deming said, had just com

pleted a study based on bank debits which showed that on a seasonally

adjusted basis total debits this year had run about 5 per cent ahead

of last year,

in

with the gain slightly larger in

the earlier months of the year.

the later months than

Debits for 1958 had averaged just

about the same as the mid-year peak level (seasonally adjusted) for

1957.

The picture was much stronger in

the farming centers,

second half debits were running well ahead of the first

and those in

half of 1958,

turn were above the 1957 peak levels.

As to policy, Mr.

lean a little

where

Deming said he thought the System should

more heavily on reserve availability.

He was not sure

what he would like to see done about the discount rate, but he supposed

the question was academic,

at least for the immediate future.

He

thought, however, that a rate change probably should be in the cards

for the rather near future.

be arranged to fit

He had not thought out what timing could

in with the Treasury financing, especially since

he had not anticipated a Treasury announcement as early as Mr. Rouse

12/16/58

-21

had indicated, and in any event he would not favor a rate change in

the next three weeks.

Perhaps wording of the directive should be

changed to speak in

terms of sustainable growth rather than balanced

economic recovery.

Mr. Deming concluded by saying that he would be

a little

tighter during the next three weeks but would not favor a

dramatic move on the discount rate.

Mr.

Allen stated that information that had become available

since the preceding Committee meeting indicated that the uptrend in

business activity remained vigorous.

sales in

Preliminary reports for retail

November showed that a new record, nationally, was achieved,

and the fact that sales of household appliances were finally picking

up was encouraging.

There had been reports to such effect from Sears

Roebuck, from Norge, and from department stores in the Seventh

District.

In further regard to department store sales, those in

Detroit showed a three per cent gain over a year ago in

the week

ended December 6, and Detroit was not particularly depressed at

this time last year.

A second indication that the business uptrend

remained vigorous was the improvement in November in employment.

Nationally, 18 centers were reclassified upward on the basis of that

improvement,

and seven of those were in

the Seventh District.

A

third factor was that plant and equipment expenditures hit a low in

the third quarter; the fourth quarter of this year and the first

quarter of 1959 should, on the basis of reports from businessmen,

show appreciable gains.

In the Chicago area, residential construction

12/16/58

-22

was booming, with building permits issued in November for 55 per cent

more units than in

the same 1957 month.

Mr. Allen went on to say that earning assets and deposits of

Seventh District banks declined somewhat in the past two weeks as

sales of securities exceeded loan growth, while credit demands on the

whole had been moderate for this time of the year.

Manufacturers of

metals and metal products--an important element in

the district--had

steadily repaid borrowings during the past two months.

bankers apparently felt

that the moderateness in

ing could be attributed in

inventories.

Some district

the amount of borrow

large part to the continued decline in

Since that decline may have stopped and an increase

started, they suspected that the drop in

loans which usually comes in

the early months of a new year might be less this time than heretofore.

Mr.

Allen recalled that at the last meeting of the Committee he

had suggested doing about what had been done in the last two weeks, but

that the Committee should be poised to take action on the restrictive

side.

He had come to this meeting with the idea of suggesting for the

next three weeks a little more restrictiveness than the reserve

figures would suggest, but doing nothing about the discount rate be

cause he had anticipated a Treasury financing announcement later in

January.

Thus, he had anticipated that the Committee meeting on

January 6 would present an opportunity for discussion of the subject.

In view of Mr. Rouse's statement, however, it would appear that action

12/16/58

-23

on the discount rate, if

any were to be taken, must be taken prior

to the January 6 meeting.

Personally, he felt that the recovery

had proceeded so far,

and the inflationary bias was such, that some

thing should be done on the rate.

action in

However,

the System desirable always,

he considered unity of

and particularly so at this

time, and he would be persuaded by the thinking of the majority.

Thus far, the comments indicated that everyone thought there should

be no action until after the period of Treasury financing.

might mean a long wait, and he was concerned about that.

favor changing the directive along the lines Mr.

This

He would

Deming had suggested.

Mr. Leedy said that from the staff review of the economic

situation and from personal observations, there could be no doubt

but that the recovery was progressing, and in many respects in a

surprising way.

He considered that moving down to a negative free

reserve position was called for; if

more,

it

the figure moved down a little

would seem to him to be in line with what the Committee

should be doing.

In view of the prospective budget deficit, the

very substantial increase in

the money supply,

referred to at this meeting, he felt that it

for the System to be more vigorous in

the recent past.

If

its

and the other indicators

was going to be necessary

actions than it

had been in

possible, he would like to see action at this

time both on the discount rate and on the directive, but he did not

feel that discount rate action would be possible because of the

seasonal factors between now and the end of the year and the

12/16/58

-24

forthcoming Treasury financing.

The directive, he thought, should

be changed for he saw no reason to refer further to promoting of

recovery.

In the past the Committee generally had undertaken to

change the directive on the occasion of a change in policy and he

did not think that some further slight tightening of reserve avail

ability would actually represent a change in policy.

Therefore,

the interim between now and the next Committee meeting it

in

was his

feeling that the extent to which the System should go would be to

allow negative free reserves to edge down a little

more.

Also, he

would subscribe to the suggestion that the Manager of the System

Account be guided more by the feel of the market than by reserve

projections.

Mr.

weeks in

Leach reported very little

general economic conditions in

change during the past two

the Fifth District.

Wage

increases had been discussed in the textile industry--one large

knitting concern had in

fact announced an increase for January-

and a $2 per day wage rise had been contracted for in

the bituminous

coal industry, where workers were now being paid $22.25 per eight

hour day.

in

This seemed to him of particular significance for it

came

the face of a recent shrinkage in production and a poor outlook

for the future.

Bituminous coal had for some years been losing in

importance relative to competing fuels, and this past year saw a

further sharp drop, due in

no small measure to the decline in

residual fuel oil prices as coal prices held firm.

Overseas

12/16/58

-25

shipments fell by a third in 1958, and European restrictions on

coal imports pointed to a further drop this year.

While improved

steel operations and higher levels of industrial activity called

for more coal, the market was scarcely favorable for the price

increases that some producers now expected to make.

West Virginia,

which produces about one-third of the country's total bituminous

coal output,

had had severe unemployment problems over the past year,

and he thought that one could look for little

help for this situation

from the higher wages now to be paid.

Continuing,

Mr.

Leach recalled that prior to 1955 average

borrowings of member banks generally rose steadily toward the end

of the year to a peak in

early December several hundred million

dollars higher than September-October levels.

This was true regard

less of whether the System was following a policy of active ease,

ease,

or neutrality, and the temporary rise in borrowings was not

considered to be inconsistent with System policy.

Committee's emphasis in

As the Open Market

policy guidance became more and more centered

on free reserve or net borrowed reserve figures, however,

no longer appeared.

this pattern

There now seemed to be a reluctance to permit an

increase in

borrowings to occur despite the seasonal pressures in this

direction.

This seemed unfortunate to him, for he saw merit in meeting

some of the seasonal needs through borrowings, which are automatically

repaid.

12/16/58

-26

Mr.

Leach commented that during the first

ten days of

December member bank borrowings averaged only $376 million, which

was $200 million less than during the corresponding period last

December and about $100 million less than the average for November

of this year.

He still

thought that seasonal needs should be allowed

to run borrowings up a little.

To him, this would not mean a signifi

cant change in policy even though it

amount of net borrowed reserves.

would presumably produce a small

The appearance of net borrowed

reserve figures for more than one week might have some adverse effect

on the Government securities market, but he believed this was a risk

that should be taken.

As to reserve availability, Mr.

Leach noted that he had wanted

to see the System get over the "hurdle of zero" and the importance it

seemed to have to the market.

With regard to the degree of tightness,

he felt that the Manager of the Account should be guided by the feel

of the market, and he would like to see modest net borrowed reserve

figures.

This would represent no real change in

slightly tighter than before.

policy, just being

He would not favor a change in the

discount rate but he would remove the word "recovery" from the directive,

with appropriate changes in wording.

During Mr.

Leach's comments,

Chairman Martin joined the meeting.

Mr. Mills expressed the view that the trend of economic develop

ments and the multiplying evidence of optimistic expectations in both

the financial and business communities justified a System policy of

12/16/58

-27

firm restraint over the volume of bank credit.

terms,

Put in

technical

such a policy would contemplate negative free reserves in

modest amounts.

In that connection, he felt that he should comment

on the subject of the money supply.

Although an increase in

the

money supply over the past year of approximately 3 per cent might

be considered to be consistent with the concept of cyclical long

term and fundamental economic growth, it

was questionable whether

additions to the money supply that had derived so largely from

previous System actions did not reflect in some degree a failure

to force the kind of redistribution of U. S. Government securities

out of commercial bank portfolios that would have been desirable

in

order to limit the expansion of commercial bank credit to the

basis of the reserves that the System had supplied in

to support Treasury financing operations.

sion at earlier Committee meetings,

recent months

As brought out in discus

a case can be made for compelling

the use of reserves supplied by the System under such conditions to

do the double duty of first

supporting the Treasury in

its

financing

and then subsequently financing the legitimate seasonal expansion of

commercial bank credit, all through the process of exerting System

pressure to force the commercial banks to reduce their investments

in

U. S. Government securities and to use the reserves thus freed to

sustain the loan demands of their customers.

He doubted that the

System had accomplished that purpose and to the extent that it

failed to do so,

had

a System policy of firm restraint should be continued

12/16/58

if

-28

the undesirable consequences of financing the Treasury's require

ments through the commercial banking system were to be avoided.

a policy of restraint,

By

he did not contemplate that the Manager of

the Account would be foreclosed from supplying new reserves if,

in

his discretion, that action would be necessary to avoid kinks in

the market during the remainder of the year.

Working on the side of

System policy would be the fact that the liquidity requirements of

corporations and banks until the year-end should add to the supply

of Treasury bills and other short-term U. S. Government securities

that should come on the market and thereby develop a firmness in

short-term interest rates that would of itself

exert a restraining

influence over the expansion of bank credit.

This kind of develop

ment could occur even though the actual volume of reserves supplied

to relieve undue market tightness seemingly might be contrary to any

upward movement in Treasury bill rates that might appear.

as that kind of situation would reverse itself

the year-end, its

Inasmuch

automatically after

appearance would not have implied any change in

System policy, except for the possibility that some market participants

might have been confused by a level of reserves that seemed to be

technically out of line with the interest rate on short-term U. S.

Government securities.

Under present conditions, Mr. Mills felt that it was not

appropriate to consider an increase in the discount rate.

After the

12/16/58

-29

end of the year when the supply and demand status for U. S. Government

securities had settled down, a clearer and more logical view could be

obtained as to what level of interest rates had become pertinent to

the new year situation in

the securities markets.

Mr. Robertson said it

given by Mr. Young,

would seem from the economic report

the comments of Mr. Thomas,

and most of the remarks

around the table this morning that the country was moving out of a

period of recovery.

He felt that it

was time to change the directive

so as to get away from reference to economic recovery and refer instead

to conditions conducive to sustainable economic growth and stability.

Under present conditions, it

appeared to him that maintenance of a

policy of firm restraint would be appropriate,

that policy was firm enough at the moment.

and he did not feel

The upward movement on

the part of business throughout the country was not spotty but broadly

based, he said, and a policy of less than firm restraint might serve

as an encouragement to labor to seek higher wages.

Prices, he believed,

were already moving higher along the line, although this development

was covered up by lower prices in the agricultural field which made it

easy to fail to see a price movement that the System ought to be doing

its

part to stop.

For the moment,

he said, the Committee should be

moving toward an increased negative availability of reserves.

Also,

he agreed with Mr. Leach that seasonal needs for the rest of the year

should be supplied to the extent possible through member bank borrowing,

12/16/58

even in

-30

preference to the use of repurchase agreements.

He would

have no objection to rate increases coming about, because he did

not believe that the System should be operating on the basis of

maintaining any particular rate structure.

It

seemed extremely

important to him to take advantage of the period between now and

the Treasury announcement in

where it

January to put the System in

could live during the next month or two.

a position

The System should

not hold steady during the intervening period, let the financing take

place, and then find itself in

destroy the market.

It

a position of having to come in and

should let rates increase, if

necessary, avoid

taking up any more of the slack than absolutely necessary, and maintain

had to date.

a tighter position than it

In other words,

he was arguing

for a movement of reserve availability downward to a tighter position

than maintained up to the present time, and he regarded this as very

important in

its

view of the fact that the Treasury would be announcing

new cash offering early in

January.

Serious consideration should

be given to an increase in the discount rate before the January 6

Committee meeting,

for it

probably would not be possible to take

action after that date and before the Treasury announcement.

the rate were not increased before the announcement,

possible to move on it

it

If

might not be

until well into the spring, which he felt would

be very unfortunate.

Mr.

Shepardson said that his views were similar to those

expressed by Mr. Robertson.

The report from the staff, other available

12/16/58

-31

reports, and his own contacts in

the field all supported the view that

recovery had been largely achieved,

that there was a high degree of

confidence regarding the period ahead,

and that the System should

achieve a much firmer policy position than had prevailed.

He thoroughly

agreed with working toward lower reserve availability, possibly toward

the level of $100 million of negative free reserves that Mr.

Irons had

mentioned.

He also agreed that there should be a change in the directive

and that it

would be desirable to have a discount rate change while it

was possible to move, rather than to have the System find itself boxed

in,

as it

had on occasions in

the past, and thereby fall behind the

parade.

Mr.

Fulton indicated that on the basis of developments in the

Fourth District he was not optimistic about the situation to the extent

of favoring "drastic" action such as Mr.

operations in the district were still

Robertson had suggested.

Steel

at rates below the national average

and there was no high degree of anticipation that those operations would

turn up precipitately, although in

and in

the latter part of the first

quarter

the second quarter there would probably be some inventory build

ing against the prospect of a steel strike.

Thus far, the users of

steel had been buying only what they could use in production.

Also,

while unemployment had declined, the decline had been slow and this

was expected to be the continuing trend.

There had been some upturn

in orders placed with manufacturers but not in

which was still

in

the doldrums.

the machine tool industry,

Construction activity had been rather

12/16/58

-32

high, both residential and heavy engineering,

fillip

to the figures in the district.

department store sales were still

while auto sales were still

some pickup recently.

heartening,

Mr.

but it

and this had given a

For the year to date, however,

three per cent behind last year,

about30 per cent below last year despit

All in all, the recovery in the district was

was not rapid by any means.

Fulton expressed the view that no precipitate move toward

tightness should be made.

He noted that the increase in bank loans

had been largely in loans on securities and in real estate loans rather

than in loans to business; the figures did not show any great demand

for credit from the businessman.

As to reserves, he believed that a

range from zero to $50 million of net borrowed reserves might be appro

priate, which would be similar to what had prevailed this week and last

week.

He did not feel that the discount rate should be changed at the

present time.

On the directive, it

would perhaps be appropriate to

make a change in wording to recognize the recovery that had taken place,

but the revision should not be an indication of any substantial change

in the System's position.

Mr.

Bopp said that the most important development in the Third

District in the past two weeks had been the continued strength in con

sumer buying.

Department store sales had continued to improve,

sales

for the latest week having been 19 per cent above a year ago--when

there was a snow storm--and 9 per cent above a year ago for the past

12/16/58

-33

four weeks.

The volume of Christmas buying was reported to be good

and most store executives thought that more

this year than last.

However,

which improved considerably in

shoppers" were buying

the demand for major appliances,

the fall, had waned since October,

consumers were reported to be price conscious,

keen.

Sales of new automobiles were still

registrations in Philadelphia in

and competition was

at a low level, new car

November having been about one-fourth

below last year and registrations in eastern Pennsylvania in

October

about one-third below October 1957. Final data showed a small decline

in

district factory employment in

decrease in fabricated metals,

October,

primarily because of a

and average hours worked and average

weekly earnings also had decreased.

Total factory employment in

October was six per cent below last year, with employment in

off 10 per cent and in

little

change in

weeks; in

nondurables off two per cent.

steel production in

the latest week,

There had been

the Philadelphia area in recent

operations were scheduled at 70.5 per cent

of capacity as compared with nearly 75 per cent nationally.

loans of district weekly reporting banks declined in

two weeks following small to moderate increases in

four weeks.

durables

Total

each of the past

each of the preceding

Business loans, which rose sharply in early November,

had

also been declining, and the decrease in the past two weeks was some

what more than in the corresponding period last year.

Weekly reporting

banks seemed to have made good progress in redistributing the new tax

bills.

Their holdings of Government securities rose $37 million in the

12/16/58

-34

week ending November 26, presumably reflecting allotments of the

new bill,

and then dropped $48 million in

the following week.

The

large Philadelphia banks had had substantial basic reserve deficiencies

in

recent weeks.

These deficiencies had been met mainly by purchasing

Federal funds but in

the last week of November the banks borrowed

substantial amounts from the Reserve Bank.

borrowed in the latest reserve week, and its

$3 million.

Only one of them, however,

daily average was only

Total member bank borrowing from the Reserve Bank in

the

latest two statement weeks averaged $27 million and $16 million,

respectively.

Turning to policy,

Mr.

Bopp expressed the view that in

with national and regional developments,

at this time should be moderate.

line

any move toward restraint

He would not favor a change in

discount rate or, at this point, in

the

the directive, which he would

like to see changed when there was a change in the discount rate.

Mr.

Bryan stated that the Sixth District continued to move

ahead at a very satisfactory,

things, nonfarm employment,

construction contracts,

not to say rapid, pace.

Among other

department store sales, demand deposits,

and manufacturing payrolls were up, insured

unemployment was down, and many of the indices were going beyond the

national average figures.

As far as the district was concerned,

the

recovery was vigorous.

As to policy,

Mr.

Bryan said that in his view more than an

even-keel policy was indicated at the present time.

He felt that

12/16/58

-35

there should be increasing restraint, and he agreed with those who

had suggested that unless a move were made on the discount rate

fairly soon the System was likely to find itself boxed in for a far

longer period than would be indicated by prospective economic and

financial developments.

Mr.

Johns said that nothing pertaining to the economy of the

Eighth District required comment,

while his thoughts regarding the

behavior of the national economy would be indicated by the views he

would express about the use of policy instruments and about the

directive.

He went on to say that he wished to align himself with

those, beginning with Mr.

Irons, who had taken the position that the

System should be moving toward greater restraint.

moving in

He would favor

that direction somewhat more vigorously and aggressively

than in recent weeks.

As to timing,

first by Mr. Robertson.

he agreed with the view stated

With respect to the directive, he felt that

it was time to eliminate the emphasis on recovery to the exclusion of

everything else and begin to say that the primary objective was re

straint upon expansion at an unsustainable rate.

He would be glad to

adopt wording such as suggested by Mr. Robertson.

Mr.

Johns continued by saying that he would favor increasing

the pressure on bank reserves, that he would not care to suggest any

net borrowed reserve target, but that he would simply increase the

pressure more rapidly than had been the case so far.

With respect to

12/16/58

-36

the discount rate, he had come to this

that the Treasury would not be in

January.

meeting under the misapprehension

the market until the third week of

Having now learned that the Treasury planned to come in

early as the eighth of January, it

adjusted promptly, and in

as

was his view that the rate should be

advance of the Treasury financing.

He was

aware of the quirks of the year-end period and the stresses and strains

generally prevalent at that time of the year, but he balanced against

those considerations the view, to which reference had already been

made,

that if

the even-keel policy meant what it

to mean at Committee meetings the arguments in

had often been said

favor of increasing the

rate before the Treasury case to the market were strong,

it

especially if

were true, as many seemed to believe, that the Treasury might offer

a long-term instrument.

Accordingly,

he would prefer to cast his lot

on the side of moving before the Treasury financing rather than after

ward.

Although he would be reluctant to call a special meeting of

the St. Louis directors at this season, he would prefer that to being

for a longer period than he would like to contemplate.

boxed in

With

respect to the magnitude of a discount rate change, at the moment he

would contemplate an increase of 1/4 per cent, although that might be

debatable.

Mr.

Johns said that he would like to protest mildly against

characterization of Mr.

Robertson's position as drastic, for he did

not think that it

Short-term rates being as they were,

was.

an

12/16/58

-37

adjustment of the discount rate would not be, in his opinion, a

drastic policy move.

To summarize,

As a matter of fact, it

might be long overdue.

he would favor changing the discount rate promptly and

he would favor revising the directive at this meeting.

Mr.

Szymczak said that he would favor maintaining a negative

free reserve position to the extent possible during the current period

of seasonal demand.

He did not think that it

mattered too much one

way or the other whether the directive was changed, and it seemed

questionable whether the discount rate could be increased at this time

without undue effect on the rate structure generally, which might hamper

some areas of the econony.

Chairman Martin said that after making his own comments,

would ask Mr.

Hayes to summarize the meeting.

The Chairman then commented that in

some hazards in

his own thinking he saw

the situation that perhaps were not real.

favor more pressure on the market,

feeling that it

he

He would

and he agreed with Mr. Szymczak in

did not make too much difference whether the directive

was changed at this time.

After mentioning that the index of industrial

production stood at 141 in

November against last year's high of 145,

he said there was a question about the point at which the trend of the

economy constituted more than a recovery movement.

However,

he would

have no objection to changing the directive at this time on the basis

of forecasting--about which one should be careful--and on the basis

12/16/58

-38

of "where we are, relative to where we were."

Chairman Martin remarked that this had been a difficult year

in the money market, and he then expressed the view that at present

it was more important to get the level of reserves down than to in

crease the discount rate.

Referring to current seasonal pressures

in the market, he said that the System should be endeavoring not to

supply all of the needs and the banks should be encouraged to come

to the discount window if they needed reserves.

At the same time,

the System should try to prevent knots from developing in the money

market.

It did not seem to him necessary to rush up on the Treasury

just because it had set a financing date, and a discount rate change

would attract quite a bit of attention.

The Chairman went on to say that his thinking was colored

somewhat by the efforts being made currently to balance the budget.

Beyond that, however,

he did not think that a discount rate change

would be terribly effective.

If

he were doing it on his own,

he

would not change the rate at this juncture regardless of the fact

that the System might be frozen in

for a while.

Furthermore,

he

did not think the System would necessarily be frozen in if more

pressure were put on the money market.

Following the Treasury

financing, the rate would probably have to be changed, but at that

time the change would come as confirmation.

were changed, it

3 per cent.

If

the discount rate

would be his view that the increase should be to

12/16/58

-39

In essence,

Chairman Martin said, he felt that the System

was in another difficult period.

and,

This was the end of a trying year

although conditions admittedly had been difficult, he did not

feel that the System had handled things too well.

There was a question

in his mind about the desirability of going into the Christmas maelstrom

just to beat the Treasury to the punch on the financing.

To change the

rate might create a more difficult situation for the Desk, and it

was

going to be difficult for the Desk anyhow.

In conclusion, the Chairman said that he would favor putting

pressure on the market,

the seasonal needs,

in

consistent with supplying some but not all of

the direction of a larger volume of negative

free reserves.

Summarizing the meeting, Mr. Hayes said it

appeared that in

the area of open market operations there was quite a clear consensus

favoring a move toward somewhat tighter restraint, but a very moderate

move.

The figures mentioned were mostly in

the zero to minus $100

million range, although some mentioned a range of zero to $50 million.

Several persons had indicated that they would favor less emphasis on

figures and more on the feel of the market,

and he judged those

persons would like to see a somewhat tighter feel than had prevailed.

There appeared to be no inhibitions about being in the negative free

reserve area; in

in that area.

fact, it

seemed to be regarded as desirable to be

There were a few who would favor going a little

further than others in that regard.

12/16/58

-40

On the discount rate, Mr. Hayes said, his count indicated

that a slight majority favored leaving the rate unchanged, although

quite a number spoke in favor of changing the rate before the Treasury

financing.

The only comments with regard to the magnitude of a rate

change were those made by Mr.

Johns and Chairman Martin.

There were

some who saw a need to prepare the way for the Treasury, while others

felt

that the System should wait until the Treasury financing was

completed.

Continuing his summary,

Mr.

Hayes said it

majority would like to see some change made in

appeared that the

the wording of the

policy directive, with the word "recovery" either deleted completely

or modified and emphasis put on the objective of preventing expansion

at an unsustainable rate.

Chairman Martin inquired how many felt that a change in the

directive was important, and several so indicated.

how many would favor language in

He then inquired

clause (b) referring to sustainable

economic growth and stability in place of balanced economic recovery,

and a large majority gave affirmative indications.

The discussion turned at this point toward interpretation of

the apparent consensus favoring a trend toward further negative free

reserves,

and Mr.

Hayes noted that no one had mentioned a figure

1/ Somewhat later, Mr. Leach suggested that the majority favoring no

change in the discount rate at this time may have been more than

"slight," and Mr. Hayes agreed.

12/16/58

-41

greater than $100 million.

Chairman Martin said that he thought the

situation would have to be measured by the Desk in terms of knots in

the market and the feel of the market, and Mr. Szymczak indicated

that he agreed with the Chairman's statement.

Mr.

Hayes commented that certainly the consensus was for a

moderate change,

and Chairman Martin put the matter in terms that

"moderate further negative free reserves were desirable."

Mr. Shepardson said he thought that was right, that the con

sensus was for a moderate move.

However,

the period of the last four or five weeks,

he had in mind that over

including this one, the

average would be close to $40 million of net borrowed reserves.

A

further move would mean trending somewhat below that figure.

Chairman Martin then inquired of Mr. Rouse whether the con

sensus was clear to him, and the latter replied that he understood

the consensus to be "tighter but not too tight."

With respect to the discount rate, Chairman Martin noted

that the comments of individuals around the table would be included

in the minutes.

The Chairman asked whether any member of the Committee felt

strongly enough to want to be recorded against a change in

the di

rective such as had been suggested, and Mr. Hayes replied that he

would like to be recorded against such a change.

Mr.

Leedy noted

12/16/58

-42

that he was not a member of the Committee and therefore had no

However,

as he had said earlier, it

vote.

was his view that the directive

ought not to be changed except at the time of a real change in policy.

Mr.

Szymczak said that although actions were more important

than the wording of the directive, he was somewhat concerned about

deleting the word "recovery" when it

appeared from the reports today

that some sections of the country still

had a way to go before

achieving full recovery.

Mr.

Shepardson commented that he would not want to argue too

strongly the point made by Mr.

however,

Szymczak.

Even conceding that point,

the momentum was such as to direct attention to what the

System was planning from this point.

While the goal of recovery

might not yet have been reached completely, it

was so close as to

permit attention to be focused on another spot.

Chairman Martin stated that that was why he would have no

objection to changing the directive,

and Mr.

would go along with the comment made by Mr.

Fulton said that he

Shepardson.

Mr.

Irons

noted that the next Committee meeting would be held on January 6

and that the Treasury's financing announcement apparently would

follow shortly thereafter.

It was his impression that the Committee

had been reluctant to change the directive just prior to a Treasury

financing.

in his mind.

Chairman Martin said that this point had been very much

He did not believe that the Committee should change

the policy directive on the eve of a Treasury financing,

and this

12/16/58

would argue for a change now rather than at the January 6 meeting.

With reference to the comment about no real change in policy,

Mr.

Rouse suggested that the Committee was sliding gradually into a

definite change.

He said he thought the Committee should know that

this was not yet realized by the market, where people were still

thinking in terms of moderate free reserves.

Thereupon, upon motion duly made

and seconded and with Mr. Hayes voting

"no", it was voted to direct the Fed

eral Reserve Bank of New York until

otherwise directed by the Committee:

(1) To make such purchases, sales, or exchanges (in

cluding replacement of maturing securities, and allowing

maturities to run off without replacement) for the System

Open Market Account in the open market or, in the case of

maturing securities, by direct exchange with the Treasury,

as may be necessary in the light of current and prospective

economic conditions and the general credit situation of the

country, with a view (a) to relating the supply of funds in

the market to the needs of commerce and business, (b) to

fostering conditions in the money market conducive to

sustainable economic growth and stability, and (c) to the

practical administration of the Account; provided that the

aggregate amount of securities held in the System Account

(including commitments for the purchase or sale of securi

ties for the Account) at the close of this date, other

than special short-term certificates of indebtedness

purchased from time to time for the temporary accommodation

of the Treasury, shall not be increased or decreased by

more than $1 billion;

(2) To purchase direct from the Treasury for the

account of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (with

discretion, in cases where it seems desirable, to issue

participations to one or more Federal Reserve Banks) such

amounts of special short-term certificates of indebtedness

as may be necessary from time to time for the temporary

accommodation of the Treasury; provided that the total

12/16/58

-44

amount of such certificates held at any one time by

the Federal Reserve Banks shall not exceed in the

aggregate $500 million.

Mr. Riefler stated that in connection with the emergency

planning program, System personnel were to be assigned to High

Point on a rotating basis beginning in

the near future.

Prior

authorization was needed for disclosure of Federal Open Market

Committee emergency resolutions to the persons so assigned, and

it was his suggestion that the Committee give a general authorization

to make available to such persons the emergency resolutions, last

approved at the meeting on March 4, 1958.

This suggestion was approved unani

mously.

Mr.

Rouse reported that the second meeting of the Technical

Committee of the New York Money Market was held on December 10, 1958,

and that the Committee was continuing its

avoid speculation in

work on plans designed to

the Government securities market and ensuing

disturbances of the kind that developed earlier this year.

Among

the suggestions that the Committee was considering were the following:

1.

That a program of education be undertaken to

show lenders, both bank and nonbank, the dangers of

or no margin to ultimate borrowers

lending on little

who may or may not be known to them.

2.

That there be instituted a new statistical

reporting system under which important lenders would

report data on the amount rate, term, collateral,

and purposes of their loans or repurchase agreement

12/16/58

-45

transactions against Government securities, and also

that discussions be held with the National Association

of Securities Dealers looking toward the provision by

member firms of data similar to the data now reported

to the New York Stock Exchange by its member firms.

3.

That further exploration concerning the possi

bility of a dealer organization be pursued.

5.

That the feasibility of developing a system of

regulation of the terms (especially margins) of loans

against Government securities be explored.

(The group

felt that regulation would be necessary but hoped that

this could be worked out within the framework of existing

legislation. The Technical Committee also believed that

recognition of dealers as a separate group was indis

pensable to an effective regulatory system.)

5. That the Federal Reserve consider using its

influence to achieve wider and more regular participation

of the banking community in financing dealers.

Mr.

Rouse said that the job immediately ahead was to explore

ways of implementing the Committee's suggestions.

He added that he

was planning to send a summary of the minutes of the December 10

meeting to each member of the Open Market Committee or that, if

any

member desired, a complete set of the minutes would be provided.

On Chairman Martin's suggestion, it was decided that complete

minutes should be sent to each member of the Committee and to each

Reserve Bank President not currently serving on the Committee.

Mr.

Rouse commented that the suggestion for a dealer organiza

tion should be kept confidential because it

standpoint of getting anything done if

would be damaging from the

word got out of the Technical

Committee.

Chairman Martin commented that Under Secretary of the

Treasury Baird had been very active in working on the problem of

12/16/58

-46

speculation in

Government securities and in

due course would

have reports from savings and loan and savings bank groups.

Mr.

Robertson recalled that at the last meeting of the

Committee he had requested that Mr. Rouse give consideration to

the problem of window-dressing of year-end bank condition state

ments from the standpoint of the use of repurchase agreements.

Mr.

Rouse said that the officers of the Securities Depart

ment of the New York Bank had been discussing the matter, that they

thought it

was necessary to deal with the market as it

exists,

and

that an attempt to shut down on repurchase agreements beyond the

general policy adopted by the Open Market Committee might have an

effect on the market that Committee policy did not contemplate.

It

appeared that the place to deal with the problem was where the

window-dressing took place rather than to attempt to deal with it

through the market.

Mr.

Robertson agreed that the problem was a difficult one.

He noted, however, that in past years the volume of repurchase

agreements had jumped up on the last day of the year and borrowings

went down.

It appeared that the banks paid off debt and that the

dealers then went to the Federal Reserve Bank for repurchase agree

ments.

While he was not prepared to offer any solution, he felt

that the problem should be borne in mind.

Mr.

Rouse indicated that further consideration would be

given to the matter.

12/16/58

-47

It was agreed that the next meeting of the Committee would

be held on January 6, 1959,

at 10:00 a.m.

Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (1958, December 15). FOMC Minutes. Fomc Minutes, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/fomc_minutes_19581216
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_fomc_minutes_19581216,
  author = {Federal Reserve},
  title = {FOMC Minutes},
  year = {1958},
  month = {Dec},
  howpublished = {Fomc Minutes, Federal Reserve},
  url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/fomc_minutes_19581216},
  note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}