fomc minutes · January 28, 2014

FOMC Minutes

Page 1

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee

January 28–29, 2014

A meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee was

held in the offices of the Board of Governors of the

Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C., on

Tuesday, January 28, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. and continued

on Wednesday, January 29, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.

PRESENT:

Ben Bernanke, Chairman

William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman

Richard W. Fisher

Narayana Kocherlakota

Sandra Pianalto

Charles I. Plosser

Jerome H. Powell

Jeremy C. Stein

Daniel K. Tarullo

Janet L. Yellen

Christine Cumming, Charles L. Evans, Jeffrey M. Lacker, Dennis P. Lockhart, and John C. Williams, Alternate Members of the Federal Open Market

Committee

James Bullard, Esther L. George, and Eric Rosengren,

Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of St.

Louis, Kansas City, and Boston, respectively

Nellie Liang, Director, Office of Financial Stability Policy and Research, Board of Governors

Stephen A. Meyer and William Nelson, Deputy Directors, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors

Jon W. Faust, Special Adviser to the Board, Office of

Board Members, Board of Governors

Linda Robertson and David W. Skidmore, Assistants to

the Board, Office of Board Members, Board of

Governors

Trevor A. Reeve, Senior Associate Director, Division

of International Finance, Board of Governors

Joyce K. Zickler, Senior Adviser, Division of Monetary

Affairs, Board of Governors

Daniel M. Covitz and Michael T. Kiley, Associate Directors, Division of Research and Statistics, Board

of Governors

Jane E. Ihrig, Deputy Associate Director, Division of

Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors

William B. English, Secretary and Economist

Matthew M. Luecke, Deputy Secretary

Michelle A. Smith, Assistant Secretary

Scott G. Alvarez, General Counsel

Thomas C. Baxter, Deputy General Counsel

Steven B. Kamin, Economist

David W. Wilcox, Economist

Edward Nelson, Assistant Director, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors; John J. Stevens,

Assistant Director, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors

James A. Clouse, Thomas A. Connors, Evan F.

Koenig, Thomas Laubach, Michael P. Leahy,

Loretta J. Mester, Paolo A. Pesenti, Samuel

Schulhofer-Wohl, Mark E. Schweitzer, and William

Wascher, Associate Economists

Dana L. Burnett, Section Chief, Division of Monetary

Affairs, Board of Governors

Simon Potter, Manager, System Open Market Account

David H. Small, Project Manager, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors

Lorie K. Logan, Deputy Manager, System Open Market Account

Michael S. Gibson, Director, Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation, Board of Governors

Jeremy B. Rudd, Adviser, Division of Research and

Statistics, Board of Governors

Burcu Duygan-Bump, Senior Project Manager, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors

Andrew Figura, Group Manager, Division of Research

and Statistics, Board of Governors

Page 2

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Michele Cavallo, Senior Economist, Division of International Finance, Board of Governors

Yuriy Kitsul, Economist, Division of Monetary Affairs,

Board of Governors

Randall A. Williams, Records Project Manager, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors

Kenneth C. Montgomery, First Vice President, Federal

Reserve Bank of Boston

David Altig, Glenn D. Rudebusch, and Daniel G. Sullivan, Executive Vice Presidents, Federal Reserve

Banks of Atlanta, San Francisco, and Chicago, respectively

Troy Davig, Geoffrey Tootell, and Christopher J. Waller, Senior Vice Presidents, Federal Reserve Banks

of Kansas City, Boston, and St. Louis, respectively

Robert L. Hetzel, Senior Economist, Federal Reserve

Bank of Richmond

Annual Organizational Matters¹

In the agenda for this meeting, it was reported that advices of the election of the following members and alternate members of the Federal Open Market Committee (the “Committee”) for a term beginning January 28,

2014, had been received and that these individuals had

executed their oaths of office.

The elected members and alternate members were as

follows:

William C. Dudley, President of the Federal Reserve

Bank of New York, with Christine Cumming, First

Vice President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New

York, as alternate

Charles I. Plosser, President of the Federal Reserve

Bank of Philadelphia, with Jeffrey M. Lacker, President

of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, as alternate

Sandra Pianalto, President of the Federal Reserve Bank

of Cleveland, with Charles L. Evans, President of the

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, as alternate

____________________

¹ Versions of the current Committee documents are

available at www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/ru

les_authorizations.htm.

Richard W. Fisher, President of the Federal Reserve

Bank of Dallas, with Dennis P. Lockhart, President of

the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, as alternate

Narayana Kocherlakota, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, with John C. Williams,

President of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, as alternate

By unanimous vote, the Committee selected Ben

Bernanke to serve as Chairman through January 31,

2014, and Janet L. Yellen to serve as Chairman, effective February 1, 2014, until the selection of her successor at the first regularly scheduled meeting of the

Committee in 2015.

By unanimous vote, the following officers of the

Committee were selected to serve until the selection of

their successors at the first regularly scheduled meeting

of the Committee in 2015:

William C. Dudley

William B. English

Matthew M. Luecke

Michelle A. Smith

Scott G. Alvarez

Thomas C. Baxter

Richard M. Ashton

Steven B. Kamin

David W. Wilcox

Vice Chairman

Secretary and Economist

Deputy Secretary

Assistant Secretary

General Counsel

Deputy General Counsel

Assistant General Counsel

Economist

Economist

James A. Clouse

Thomas A. Connors

Evan F. Koenig

Thomas Laubach

Michael P. Leahy

Loretta J. Mester

Paolo A. Pesenti

Samuel Schulhofer-Wohl

Mark E. Schweitzer

William Wascher

Associate Economists

By unanimous vote, the Federal Reserve Bank of New

York was selected to execute transactions for the System Open Market Account.

By unanimous vote, the Authorization for Domestic

Open Market Operations was approved with an

amendment that makes the structure of paragraphs 1.A

and 1.B more similar. The Guidelines for the Conduct

of System Open Market Operations in Federal-Agency

Issues remained suspended.

Minutes of the Meeting of January 28–29, 2014

Page 3

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

AUTHORIZATION FOR DOMESTIC OPEN

MARKET OPERATIONS

(As amended effective January 28, 2014)

1. The Federal Open Market Committee authorizes

and directs the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, to

the extent necessary to carry out the most recent domestic policy directive adopted at a meeting of the

Committee:

A. To buy or sell in the open market U.S. government securities, including securities of the Federal

Financing Bank, and securities that are direct obligations of, or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, any agency of the United States, from or to

securities dealers and foreign and international accounts maintained at the Federal Reserve Bank of

New York, on a cash, regular, or deferred delivery

basis, for the System Open Market Account at market prices, and, for such Account, to exchange maturing U.S. government and federal agency securities

with the Treasury or the individual agencies or to allow them to mature without replacement; and

B. To buy or sell in the open market U.S. government securities, and securities that are direct obligations of, or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, any agency of the United States, for the System Open Market Account under agreements to resell or repurchase such securities or obligations (including such transactions as are commonly referred

to as repo and reverse repo transactions) in 65 business days or less, at rates that, unless otherwise expressly authorized by the Committee, shall be determined by competitive bidding, after applying reasonable limitations on the volume of agreements with

individual counterparties.

2. The Federal Open Market Committee authorizes

the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to undertake

transactions of the type described in paragraphs 1.A

and 1.B from time to time for the purpose of testing

operational readiness. The aggregate par value of such

transactions of the type described in paragraph 1.A

shall not exceed $5 billion per calendar year. The outstanding amount of such transactions of the type described in paragraph 1.B shall not exceed $5 billion at

any given time. These transactions shall be conducted

with prior notice to the Committee.

3. In order to ensure the effective conduct of open

market operations, the Federal Open Market Committee authorizes the Federal Reserve Bank of New York

to use agents in agency MBS-related transactions.

4. In order to ensure the effective conduct of open

market operations, the Federal Open Market Committee authorizes the Federal Reserve Bank of New York

to lend on an overnight basis U.S. government securities and securities that are direct obligations of any

agency of the United States, held in the System Open

Market Account, to dealers at rates that shall be determined by competitive bidding. The Federal Reserve

Bank of New York shall set a minimum lending fee

consistent with the objectives of the program and apply

reasonable limitations on the total amount of a specific

issue that may be auctioned and on the amount of securities that each dealer may borrow. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York may reject bids that could

facilitate a dealer’s ability to control a single issue as

determined solely by the Federal Reserve Bank of New

York. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York may

lend securities on longer than an overnight basis to accommodate weekend, holiday, and similar trading conventions.

5. In order to ensure the effective conduct of open

market operations, while assisting in the provision of

short-term investments or other authorized services for

foreign and international accounts maintained at the

Federal Reserve Bank of New York and accounts

maintained at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York

as fiscal agent of the United States pursuant to section

15 of the Federal Reserve Act, the Federal Open Market Committee authorizes and directs the Federal Reserve Bank of New York:

A. For the System Open Market Account, to sell

U.S. government securities and securities that are direct obligations of, or fully guaranteed as to principal

and interest by, any agency of the United States to

such accounts on the bases set forth in paragraph 1.A

under agreements providing for the resale by such

accounts of those securities in 65 business days or

less on terms comparable to those available on such

transactions in the market;

B. For the New York Bank account, when appropriate, to undertake with dealers, subject to the conditions imposed on purchases and sales of securities

in paragraph l.B, repurchase agreements in U.S. government securities and securities that are direct obligations of, or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, any agency of the United States, and to arrange corresponding sale and repurchase agreements

between its own account and such foreign, international, and fiscal agency accounts maintained at the

Federal Reserve Bank; and

C. For the New York Bank account, when appropriate, to buy U.S. government securities and obligations that are direct obligations of, or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, any agency of the

United States from such foreign and international accounts maintained at the Federal Reserve Bank under

Page 4

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

agreements providing for the repurchase by such accounts of those securities on the same business day.

Transactions undertaken with such accounts under the

provisions of this paragraph may provide for a service

fee when appropriate.

6. In the execution of the Committee’s decision regarding policy during any intermeeting period, the

Committee authorizes and directs the Federal Reserve

Bank of New York, upon the instruction of the Chairman of the Committee, to (i) adjust somewhat in exceptional circumstances the degree of pressure on reserve positions and hence the intended federal funds

rate and to take actions that result in material changes

in the composition and size of the assets in the System

Open Market Account other than those anticipated by

the Committee at its most recent meeting or (ii) undertake transactions of the type described in paragraphs

1.A and 1.B in order to appropriately address temporary disruptions of an operational or highly unusual

nature in U.S. dollar funding markets. Any such adjustment as described in clause (i) shall be made in the

context of the Committee’s discussion and decision at

its most recent meeting and the Committee’s long-run

objectives to foster maximum employment and price

stability, and shall be based on economic, financial, and

monetary developments during the intermeeting period. Consistent with Committee practice, the Chairman, if feasible, will consult with the Committee before

making any instruction under this paragraph.

The Committee voted unanimously to amend the Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations, the Foreign Currency Directive, and the Procedural Instructions with Respect to Foreign Currency Operations in

the form shown below. The approval of these documents included approval of the System’s warehousing

agreement with the U.S. Treasury. These documents

were modified to incorporate the dollar and foreign

currency liquidity swap arrangements authorized by a

resolution on October 29, 2013. Changes were made

to the Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations

and the Procedural Instructions with Respect to Foreign Currency Operations to align the treatment of the

liquidity swap arrangements and that of the reciprocal

currency arrangements that have been in place with the

central banks of Mexico and Canada since 1994 as part

of the North American Framework Agreement. The

Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations was

amended to remove language regarding the transmission of pertinent information on System foreign currency operations to appropriate officials of the Treasury Department because this language duplicated lan-

guage in the Program for Security of FOMC Information.

AUTHORIZATION FOR FOREIGN CURRENCY

OPERATIONS

(As amended effective January 28, 2014)

1. The Federal Open Market Committee authorizes

and directs the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, for

the System Open Market Account, to the extent necessary to carry out the Committee’s foreign currency directive and express authorizations by the Committee

pursuant thereto, and in conformity with such procedural instructions as the Committee may issue from

time to time:

A. To purchase and sell the following foreign currencies in the form of cable transfers through spot or

forward transactions on the open market at home

and abroad, including transactions with the U.S.

Treasury, with the U.S. Exchange Stabilization Fund

established by section 10 of the Gold Reserve Act of

1934, with foreign monetary authorities, with the

Bank for International Settlements, and with other

international financial institutions:

Australian dollars

Brazilian reais

Canadian dollars

Danish kroner

euro

Japanese yen

Korean won

Mexican pesos

New Zealand dollars

Norwegian kroner

Pounds sterling

Singapore dollars

Swedish kronor

Swiss francs

B. To hold balances of, and to have outstanding

forward contracts to receive or to deliver, the foreign

currencies listed in paragraph A above.

C. To draw foreign currencies and to permit foreign banks to draw dollars under the arrangements

listed in paragraph 2 below, in accordance with the

Procedural Instructions with Respect to Foreign Currency Operations.

D. To maintain an overall open position in all foreign currencies not exceeding $25.0 billion. For this

purpose, the overall open position in all foreign currencies is defined as the sum (disregarding signs) of

net positions in individual currencies, excluding

Minutes of the Meeting of January 28–29, 2014

Page 5

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

changes in dollar value due to foreign exchange rate

movements and interest accruals. The net position in

a single foreign currency is defined as holdings of

balances in that currency, plus outstanding contracts

for future receipt, minus outstanding contracts for

future delivery of that currency, i.e., as the sum of

these elements with due regard to sign.

2. The Federal Open Market Committee directs the

Federal Reserve Bank of New York to maintain for the

System Open Market Account (subject to the requirements of section 214.5 of Regulation N, Relations with

Foreign Banks and Bankers):

A. Reciprocal currency arrangements with the following foreign banks:

Foreign bank

Amount of arrangement

(millions of dollars equivalent)

Bank of Canada

Bank of Mexico

2,000

3,000

B. Standing dollar liquidity swap arrangements

with the following foreign banks:

Bank of Canada

Bank of England

Bank of Japan

European Central Bank

Swiss National Bank

C. Standing foreign currency liquidity swap arrangements with the following foreign banks:

Bank of Canada

Bank of England

Bank of Japan

European Central Bank

Swiss National Bank

Dollar and foreign currency liquidity swap arrangements have no pre-set size limits. Any new swap arrangements shall be referred for review and approval

to the Committee. All swap arrangements are subject

to annual review and approval by the Committee.

3. All transactions in foreign currencies undertaken

under paragraph 1.A above shall, unless otherwise expressly authorized by the Committee, be at prevailing

market rates. For the purpose of providing an investment return on System holdings of foreign currencies

or for the purpose of adjusting interest rates paid or

received in connection with swap drawings, transactions with foreign central banks may be undertaken at

non-market exchange rates.

4. It shall be the normal practice to arrange with foreign central banks for the coordination of foreign currency transactions. In making operating arrangements

with foreign central banks on System holdings of foreign currencies, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York

shall not commit itself to maintain any specific balance,

unless authorized by the Federal Open Market Committee. Any agreements or understandings concerning

the administration of the accounts maintained by the

Federal Reserve Bank of New York with the foreign

banks designated by the Board of Governors under

section 214.5 of Regulation N shall be referred for review and approval to the Committee.

5. Foreign currency holdings shall be invested to

ensure that adequate liquidity is maintained to meet

anticipated needs and so that each currency portfolio

shall generally have an average duration of no more

than 18 months (calculated as Macaulay duration).

Such investments may include buying or selling outright obligations of, or fully guaranteed as to principal

and interest by, a foreign government or agency thereof; buying such securities under agreements for repurchase of such securities; selling such securities under

agreements for the resale of such securities; and holding various time and other deposit accounts at foreign

institutions. In addition, when appropriate in connection with arrangements to provide investment facilities

for foreign currency holdings, U.S. government securities may be purchased from foreign central banks under

agreements for repurchase of such securities within 30

calendar days.

6. All operations undertaken pursuant to the preceding paragraphs shall be reported promptly to the Foreign Currency Subcommittee and the Committee. The

Foreign Currency Subcommittee consists of the

Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Committee, the

Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors, and such

other member of the Board as the Chairman may designate (or in the absence of members of the Board

serving on the Subcommittee, other Board members

designated by the Chairman as alternates, and in the

absence of the Vice Chairman of the Committee, the

Vice Chairman’s alternate). Meetings of the Subcommittee shall be called at the request of any member, or

at the request of the manager, System Open Market

Account (“manager”), for the purposes of reviewing

recent or contemplated operations and of consulting

with the manager on other matters relating to the manager’s responsibilities. At the request of any member

of the Subcommittee, questions arising from such reviews and consultations shall be referred for determination to the Federal Open Market Committee.

7. The Chairman is authorized:

Page 6

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

A. With the approval of the Committee, to enter

into any needed agreement or understanding with the

Secretary of the Treasury about the division of responsibility for foreign currency operations between

the System and the Treasury;

B. To keep the Secretary of the Treasury fully advised concerning System foreign currency operations,

and to consult with the Secretary on policy matters

relating to foreign currency operations;

C. From time to time, to transmit appropriate reports and information to the National Advisory

Council on International Monetary and Financial

Policies.

8. All Federal Reserve Banks shall participate in the

foreign currency operations for System Account in accordance with paragraph 3G(1) of the Board of Governors’ Statement of Procedure with Respect to Foreign Relationships of Federal Reserve Banks dated January 1, 1944.

9. The Federal Open Market Committee authorizes

the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to undertake

transactions of the type described in paragraphs 1, 2,

and 5, and foreign exchange and investment transactions that it may be otherwise authorized to undertake

from time to time for the purpose of testing operational readiness. The aggregate amount of such transactions shall not exceed $2.5 billion per calendar year.

These transactions shall be conducted with prior notice

to the Committee.

FOREIGN CURRENCY DIRECTIVE

(As amended effective January 28, 2014)

1. System operations in foreign currencies shall generally be directed at countering disorderly market conditions, provided that market exchange rates for the

U.S. dollar reflect actions and behavior consistent with

IMF Article IV, Section 1.

2. To achieve this end the System shall:

A. Undertake spot and forward purchases and sales

of foreign exchange.

B. Maintain reciprocal currency arrangements with

foreign central banks in accordance with the Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations.

C. Maintain standing dollar liquidity swap arrangements with foreign banks in accordance with

the Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations.

D. Maintain standing foreign currency liquidity

swap arrangements with foreign banks in accordance

with the Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations.

E. Cooperate in other respects with central banks

of other countries and with international monetary

institutions.

3. Transactions may also be undertaken:

A. To adjust System balances in light of probable

future needs for currencies.

B. To provide means for meeting System and

Treasury commitments in particular currencies, and

to facilitate operations of the Exchange Stabilization

Fund.

C. For such other purposes as may be expressly

authorized by the Committee.

4. System foreign currency operations shall be conducted:

A. In close and continuous consultation and cooperation with the United States Treasury;

B. In cooperation, as appropriate, with foreign

monetary authorities; and

C. In a manner consistent with the obligations of

the United States in the International Monetary Fund

regarding exchange arrangements under IMF Article

IV.

PROCEDURAL INSTRUCTIONS WITH RESPECT

TO FOREIGN CURRENCY OPERATIONS

(As amended effective January 28, 2014)

In conducting operations pursuant to the authorization

and direction of the Federal Open Market Committee

(the “Committee”) as set forth in the Authorization for

Foreign Currency Operations and the Foreign Currency Directive, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York,

through the manager, System Open Market Account

(“manager”), shall be guided by the following procedural understandings with respect to consultations and

clearances with the Committee, the Foreign Currency

Subcommittee (the “Subcommittee”), and the Chairman of the Committee, unless otherwise directed by

the Committee. All operations undertaken pursuant to

such clearances shall be reported promptly to the

Committee.

1. For the reciprocal currency arrangements authorized in paragraphs 2.A of the Authorization for Foreign

Currency Operations:

A. Drawings must be approved by the Subcommittee (or by the Chairman, if the Chairman believes

that consultation with the Subcommittee is not feasible in the time available) if the swap drawing proposed by a foreign bank does not exceed the larger of

(i) $200 million or (ii) 15 percent of the size of the

swap arrangement.

Minutes of the Meeting of January 28–29, 2014

Page 7

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

B. Drawings must be approved by the Committee

(or by the Subcommittee, if the Subcommittee believes that consultation with the full Committee is

not feasible in the time available, or by the Chairman,

if the Chairman believes that consultation with the

Subcommittee is not feasible in the time available) if

the swap drawing proposed by a foreign bank exceeds the larger of (i) $200 million or (ii) 15 percent

of the size of the swap arrangement.

C. The manager shall also consult with the Subcommittee or the Chairman about proposed swap

drawings by the System.

D. Any changes in the terms of existing swap arrangements shall be referred for review and approval

to the Chairman. The Chairman shall keep the

Committee informed of any changes in terms, and

the terms shall be consistent with principles discussed with and guidance provided by the Committee.

2. For the dollar and foreign currency liquidity swap

arrangements authorized in paragraphs 2.B and 2.C of

the Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations:

A. Drawings must be approved by the Chairman in

consultation with the Subcommittee. The Chairman

or the Subcommittee will consult with the Committee prior to the initial drawing on the dollar or foreign currency liquidity swap lines if possible under

the circumstances then prevailing; authority to approve subsequent drawings for either the dollar or

foreign currency liquidity swap lines may be delegated to the manager by the Chairman.

B. Any changes in the terms of existing swap arrangements shall be referred for review and approval

to the Chairman. The Chairman shall keep the

Committee informed of any changes in terms, and

the terms shall be consistent with principles discussed with and guidance provided by the Committee.

3. Any operation must be approved by:

A. The Subcommittee (or by the Chairman, if the

Chairman believes that consultation with the Subcommittee is not feasible in the time available) if it:

i.

Would result in a change in the System’s

overall open position in foreign currencies exceeding $300 million on any day or $600 million since

the most recent regular meeting of the Committee.

ii. Would result in a change on any day in the

System’s net position in a single foreign currency

exceeding $150 million, or $300 million when the

operation is associated with repayment of swap

drawings.

iii. Might generate a substantial volume of trading in a particular currency by the System, even

though the change in the System’s net position in

that currency (as defined in paragraph 1.D of the

Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations)

might be less than the limits specified in 3.A.ii.

B. The Committee (or by the Subcommittee, if the

Subcommittee believes that consultation with the full

Committee is not feasible in the time available, or by

the Chairman, if the Chairman believes that consultation with the Subcommittee is not feasible in the time

available) if it would result in a change in the System’s overall open position in foreign currencies exceeding $1.5 billion since the most recent regular

meeting of the Committee.

4. The Committee authorizes the Federal Reserve

Bank of New York to undertake transactions of the

type described in paragraphs 1, 2, and 5 of the Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations and foreign

exchange and investment transactions that it may be

otherwise authorized to undertake from time to time

for the purpose of testing operational readiness. The

aggregate amount of such transactions shall not exceed

$2.5 billion per calendar year. These transactions shall

be conducted with prior notice to the Committee.

In its annual reconsideration of the Statement on

Longer-Run Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy, participants generally agreed that only minor updates were

required at this meeting. It was noted, however, that

because this was the third year in which the statement

was being issued, the coming year would be an appropriate time to consider whether the statement could be

enhanced in any way. For example, some participants

advocated an explicit indication that inflation persistently below the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run objective and inflation persistently above that objective

would be equally undesirable. Some others suggested

that the statement could more clearly describe how the

mandated goals of maximum employment and price

stability are linked with the objective of financial stability. Following the discussion, the Committee voted to

approve minor wording changes to the statement and

to update the statement’s reference to participants’ estimates of the longer-run normal unemployment rate.

Mr. Tarullo abstained from the vote because he continued to think that the statement had not advanced the

cause of communicating or achieving greater consensus

in the policy views of the Committee.

Page 8

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT ON LONGER-RUN GOALS AND

MONETARY POLICY STRATEGY

(As amended effective January 28, 2014)

“The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is

firmly committed to fulfilling its statutory mandate

from the Congress of promoting maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest

rates. The Committee seeks to explain its monetary

policy decisions to the public as clearly as possible.

Such clarity facilitates well-informed decisionmaking by

households and businesses, reduces economic and financial uncertainty, increases the effectiveness of monetary policy, and enhances transparency and accountability, which are essential in a democratic society.

Inflation, employment, and long-term interest rates

fluctuate over time in response to economic and financial disturbances. Moreover, monetary policy actions

tend to influence economic activity and prices with a

lag. Therefore, the Committee’s policy decisions reflect

its longer-run goals, its medium-term outlook, and its

assessments of the balance of risks, including risks to

the financial system that could impede the attainment

of the Committee’s goals.

The inflation rate over the longer run is primarily determined by monetary policy, and hence the Committee

has the ability to specify a longer-run goal for inflation.

The Committee reaffirms its judgment that inflation at

the rate of 2 percent, as measured by the annual change

in the price index for personal consumption expenditures, is most consistent over the longer run with the

Federal Reserve’s statutory mandate. Communicating

this inflation goal clearly to the public helps keep longer-term inflation expectations firmly anchored, thereby

fostering price stability and moderate long-term interest

rates and enhancing the Committee’s ability to promote

maximum employment in the face of significant economic disturbances.

The maximum level of employment is largely determined by nonmonetary factors that affect the structure

and dynamics of the labor market. These factors may

change over time and may not be directly measurable.

Consequently, it would not be appropriate to specify a

fixed goal for employment; rather, the Committee’s

policy decisions must be informed by assessments of

the maximum level of employment, recognizing that

such assessments are necessarily uncertain and subject

to revision. The Committee considers a wide range of

indicators in making these assessments. Information

about Committee participants’ estimates of the longerrun normal rates of output growth and unemployment

is published four times per year in the FOMC’s Summary of Economic Projections. For example, in the

most recent projections, FOMC participants’ estimates

of the longer-run normal rate of unemployment had a

central tendency of 5.2 percent to 5.8 percent.

In setting monetary policy, the Committee seeks to

mitigate deviations of inflation from its longer-run goal

and deviations of employment from the Committee’s

assessments of its maximum level. These objectives are

generally complementary. However, under circumstances in which the Committee judges that the objectives are not complementary, it follows a balanced approach in promoting them, taking into account the

magnitude of the deviations and the potentially different time horizons over which employment and inflation are projected to return to levels judged consistent

with its mandate.

The Committee intends to reaffirm these principles

and to make adjustments as appropriate at its annual

organizational meeting each January.”

By unanimous vote, the Committee amended its Rules

of Organization to add the position of deputy manager

of the System Open Market Account.

By unanimous vote, the Committee amended its Program for Security of FOMC Information with minor

changes to the review and reporting process for

breaches in the information security rules and with several other minor updates and clarifications.

By unanimous vote, the Committee selected Simon

Potter and Lorie K. Logan to serve at the pleasure of

the Committee as manager and deputy manager of the

System Open Market Account, respectively, on the understanding that their selection was subject to their being satisfactory to the Federal Reserve Bank of New

York.

Secretary’s note: Advice subsequently was

received that the manager and deputy manager selections indicated above were satisfactory to the Federal Reserve Bank of New

York.

Developments in Financial Markets and the Federal Reserve’s Balance Sheet

The manager of the System Open Market Account

(SOMA) reported on developments in domestic and

foreign financial markets as well as System open market

operations during the period since the Federal Open

Market Committee met on December 17–18, 2013.

The manager also presented an update on the ongoing

overnight reverse repurchase agreement (ON RRP)

exercise.

All operations to date had proceeded

Minutes of the Meeting of January 28–29, 2014

Page 9

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

smoothly. The number of participating counterparties

and total allotment in the daily operations increased in

late December, in part reflecting the fact that overnight

secured rates were low compared with the fixed rate

offered in the operations as well as the increase in the

cap on individual counterparty bids to $3 billion from

$1 billion that was implemented on December 23,

2013. Counterparties’ year-end balance sheet adjustments also boosted participation for a time; the ON

RRP operations reportedly helped limit downward

pressure on money market rates around year-end.

Following the manager’s report, meeting participants

discussed a proposal to extend the Desk’s authority to

conduct the ON RRP exercise for 12 months and to

lift the per-counterparty bid limit. Under the terms of

the proposal, the interest rate on ON RRPs would remain between 0 and 5 basis points. The Chair of the

FOMC would authorize any changes in the offered rate

or per-counterparty bid limit. Adjustments to the bid

limit would be made in gradual steps, and the Committee would be consulted before the exercise would move

to full allotment. The proposed changes were intended

to allow the Committee to obtain additional information about the potential usefulness of ON RRP operations for affecting market interest rates when that

step becomes appropriate. Most meeting participants

supported the proposal, with a couple emphasizing that

the period for which the exercise would be extended

was likely sufficiently long that counterparties would be

willing to adjust their current money market practices,

thereby providing better information on the possible

market effects of such operations. It was remarked

that the additional insights obtained from the exercise

could be useful in the context of the Committee’s future discussions about monetary policy implementation

over the medium and longer term. A number of participants, however, indicated a preference for retaining a

cap on the per-counterparty bid limit until the Committee has discussed possible approaches to medium-term

policy implementation, and a few of these participants

preferred to extend the exercise for a shorter period.

Following the discussion, the Committee approved the

following resolution:

“The Federal Open Market Committee

(FOMC) authorizes the Federal Reserve

Bank of New York to conduct a series of

fixed-rate, overnight reverse repurchase operations involving U.S. Government securities, and securities that are direct obligations

of, or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, any agency of the United States, for

the purpose of further assessing the potential

role for such operations in supporting the

implementation of monetary policy. The reverse repurchase operations authorized by

this resolution shall be offered at a fixed rate

that may vary from zero to five basis points,

and for an overnight term, or such longer

term as is warranted to accommodate weekend, holiday, and similar trading conventions.

Any change to the offered rate within the

range specified above or the percounterparty bid limits will require approval

of the Chairman. The System Open Market

Account manager will notify the FOMC in

advance about any changes to the terms of

operations. These operations shall be authorized through January 30, 2015.”

Messrs. Fisher and Plosser dissented because of their

preference for retaining a cap on the maximum size of

counterparties’ offers during the extension; Mr. Plosser

also preferred a shorter extension of the exercise.

By unanimous vote, the Committee ratified the Open

Market Desk’s domestic transactions over the intermeeting period. There were no intervention operations

in foreign currencies for the System’s account over the

intermeeting period.

Staff Review of the Economic Situation

The information reviewed for the January 28–29 meeting indicated that the rate of economic growth picked

up in the second half of 2013. Total payroll employment increased in December, but at a slower pace than

in previous months, and the unemployment rate declined but was still elevated. Consumer price inflation

continued to run below the Committee’s longer-run

objective, while measures of longer-term inflation expectations remained stable.

Overall, labor market indicators appeared consistent

with a gradual ongoing improvement in labor market

conditions. Total nonfarm payroll employment expanded by less in December than in the previous two

months, perhaps partly because of unusually bad

weather. The unemployment rate declined to 6.7 percent in December. The labor force participation rate

also decreased, and the employment-to-population ratio was little changed. The rate of long-duration unemployment declined, but the share of workers employed part time for economic reasons was little

changed, and both measures remained elevated.

Among other indicators of labor market conditions, the

rate of job openings edged up in recent months, and

the share of small businesses reporting that they had

Page 10

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

hard-to-fill positions trended up. Measures of firms’

hiring plans were higher than a year earlier, but the rate

of gross private-sector hiring was still low. Initial

claims for unemployment insurance moved down, on

balance, over the intermeeting period, and household

expectations of the labor market situation improved,

on net, in December and early January.

Manufacturing production increased at a robust pace in

the fourth quarter, with broad-based gains across industries. Indicators of manufacturing production, such

as the readings on new orders from national and regional manufacturing surveys, were consistent with a

further expansion in factory output early this year, but

automakers’ production schedules indicated that the

pace of light motor vehicle assemblies would decline in

the first quarter.

Real personal consumption expenditures (PCE) rose at

a faster pace in October and November than in the

third quarter. In December, the components of the

nominal retail sales data used by the Bureau of Economic Analysis to construct its estimate of PCE increased strongly, although sales of light motor vehicles

declined after posting a large gain in November. Recent information on several important factors that influence household spending was somewhat mixed.

Households’ real disposable income was little changed

in October and November, and the expiration of the

emergency unemployment compensation program at

the end of 2013 was expected to reduce aggregate income growth early this year. However, households’ net

worth likely continued to expand in recent months as a

result of rising equity prices and home values. Consumer sentiment in the Thomson Reuters/University

of Michigan Surveys of Consumers improved, on balance, in December and early January after a decline in

the fall of 2013.

December and November’s increase was revised down,

the level of orders remained above that of shipments,

pointing to further increases in shipments in subsequent months. Other forward-looking indicators, such

as surveys of business conditions and capital spending

plans, were also generally consistent with near-term

gains in business equipment spending. Nominal expenditures for nonresidential construction, which had

been flat in October, moved higher in November. Data on book-value inventories suggested little change in

the pace of nonfarm inventory investment in the fourth

quarter, and the available information did not point to

significant inventory imbalances in most industries.

Real federal government purchases likely fell sharply in

the fourth quarter because of continued declines in

defense spending and the temporary partial shutdown

of the federal government in October. Increases in real

state and local government purchases appeared to have

moderated in the fourth quarter. The payrolls of these

governments were about unchanged during the fourth

quarter, and nominal state and local construction expenditures for October and November increased at a

slower pace, on net, than in the third quarter.

The U.S. international trade deficit narrowed substantially in November, as exports increased and imports

fell. The higher value of exports stemmed in large part

from an increase in sales of petroleum products, while

the fall in imports was primarily due to a decline in

purchases of crude oil.

The pace of activity in the housing sector showed some

tentative signs of stabilizing, as the effects of the past

year’s rise in mortgage rates appeared to wane. Singlefamily housing starts increased in November and only

partly reversed that gain in December, while permits

for new construction rose a little, on balance, in the

fourth quarter. New home sales declined in November

and December but were nonetheless higher than in the

third quarter, and existing home sales flattened out in

December after decreasing for several months.

Total U.S. consumer price inflation, as measured by the

PCE price index, was a little under 1 percent over the

12 months ending in November, well below the Committee’s 2 percent longer-term objective. Over that

period, consumer energy prices declined, consumer

food prices rose modestly, and core PCE prices—

which exclude consumer food and energy prices—

increased slightly more than 1 percent. In December,

the consumer price index (CPI) rose somewhat faster

than in recent months, primarily reflecting an upturn in

consumer energy prices; core CPI inflation remained

low. Both near-term and longer-term inflation expectations from the Michigan survey were little changed, on

net, in December and early January. Over the 12

months ending in December, nominal average hourly

earnings for all employees increased slightly faster than

consumer price inflation.

Real private expenditures for business equipment and

intellectual property products appeared to strengthen in

the fourth quarter, as nominal shipments of nondefense capital goods rose at a solid pace. Although

nominal new orders for these capital goods declined in

Foreign economic activity continued to improve, with

economic growth in the third quarter of 2013 higher

than in the first half of the year and more recent indicators suggesting further gains. The pickup was widespread, as the euro area registered a second consecutive

Minutes of the Meeting of January 28–29, 2014

Page 11

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

quarter of positive economic growth, the Mexican

economy bounced back from a second-quarter contraction, and stronger external demand boosted growth in

emerging market economies more generally. At the

same time, inflation continued to run below central

bank targets in several advanced economies, and monetary policy remained expansionary in these economies.

Inflation in emerging market economies remained

moderate on average, although Brazil, India, and Turkey again tightened monetary policy during the intermeeting period in response to concerns about inflation

and currency depreciation. The policy tightening in

Turkey was particularly sharp and followed several days

of heightened financial market pressures toward the

end of the intermeeting period. Similar pressures were

evident in some other emerging market economies as

well.

Staff Review of the Financial Situation

Financial market conditions over the intermeeting period were importantly influenced by Federal Reserve

communications, somewhat better-than-expected economic data releases, and developments in emerging

market economies. On net, financial conditions in the

United States remained supportive of growth in economic activity and employment: Equity prices increased a bit, longer-term interest rates declined, and

the dollar appreciated against most other currencies.

While investors were somewhat surprised by the

FOMC’s decision at its December meeting to reduce

the pace of its asset purchases, the policy action and

associated communications appeared to have only a

limited effect on market participants’ outlook for the

Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. Indeed, the Committee’s decision to cut the pace of purchases and its rationale for doing so seemed to increase investors’ confidence in the economic outlook, a shift that was further supported by subsequent U.S. economic data releases. However, those effects were reversed late in the

period when investors appeared to pull back from riskier assets in reaction to rising concern about developments in some emerging market economies and their

possible implications for global economic growth.

Results from the Desk’s survey of primary dealers conducted prior to the January meeting indicated that dealers anticipated only minor changes to the Committee’s

postmeeting statement. In addition, the median dealer

expected a $10 billion reduction in the monthly pace of

asset purchases to be announced at each meeting in the

first three quarters of 2014, with the purchase program

ending with a final $15 billion reduction at the October

2014 meeting.

On balance, 10-and 30-year nominal Treasury yields

declined about 10 basis points and 20 basis points, respectively, over the intermeeting period, in part because

of an increase in safe-haven demands toward the end

of the period. The December policy action and subsequent muted market reaction led to decreased uncertainty about future longer-term interest rates, perhaps

contributing to the decline in longer-term rates. The

measure of 5-year inflation compensation based on

Treasury inflation-protected securities increased a little,

while inflation compensation 5 to 10 years ahead decreased somewhat.

Conditions in short-term dollar funding markets generally remained stable. Year-end funding pressures were

modest, and overnight money market rates declined

about in line with their typical behavior in past years.

Repo rates were quite low at the end of the year and

remained low through most of January, leading to increased participation in the Federal Reserve’s ON RRP

operations, with a substantial temporary increase in

take-up at year-end. Primarily reflecting the increased

participation in the exercise, reserve balances expanded

more slowly and the rate of increase in the monetary

base slowed in December. M2 continued to expand

moderately.

Reflecting the improved outlook for economic activity

and despite mixed fourth-quarter earnings results, the

stock prices of bank holding companies rose notably

and spreads on credit default swaps for the largest bank

holding companies narrowed somewhat. According to

the January Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on

Bank Lending Practices, domestic banks continued to

ease their lending standards and some loan terms on

balance; they also experienced an increase in demand,

on net, in most major loan categories in the fourth

quarter.

Broad U.S. equity price indexes edged higher, on net,

over the intermeeting period, and equity issuance by

nonfinancial corporations increased. Credit remained

widely available to large nonfinancial corporations.

Corporate bond spreads continued to narrow over the

intermeeting period, with investment-grade bond

spreads reaching their lowest levels in several years and

those on speculative-grade corporate bonds approaching pre-crisis levels. Bond issuance by domestic corporations generally stayed strong, commercial and industrial loans on banks’ books increased by a notable

amount late in the fourth quarter, and issuance of leveraged loans and collateralized loan obligations generally continued apace.

Page 12

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Conditions in the commercial real estate sector recovered further in the fourth quarter, with rising property

prices and fewer distressed sales. In the market for

commercial mortgage-backed securities, investor demand remained strong and spreads continued to be

tight despite high issuance near year-end. Commercial

real estate loans on banks’ books expanded moderately.

Credit conditions in municipal bond markets generally

remained stable, although a few issuers continued to

experience substantial strain. Available data suggest

that, for the first time in several years, the ratings agency Moody’s Investors Service made more upgrades

than downgrades to municipal debt in the fourth quarter. However, Moody’s put Puerto Rico on watch for a

downgrade.

Households continued to face mixed credit conditions

in the fourth quarter. Consumer credit expanded again

in November, boosted by further gains in auto and student loans, and bank credit data indicate that this expansion likely continued through December. In contrast, credit card balances were little changed, on net,

through November, as underwriting appeared to remain quite tight. The volume of mortgage applications

for home purchases held about steady since the previous FOMC meeting while refinance applications remained at very low levels. Mortgage rates declined

slightly, in line with modestly lower yields on agency

mortgage-backed securities. Despite tight mortgage

availability and subdued borrowing, house prices continued to increase in November, although not as quickly as earlier in 2013.

Financial market conditions in the advanced foreign

economies over the intermeeting period generally became more supportive of growth. Long-term government bond yields declined and headline equity indexes

increased, on net, in most of these countries, with bank

stock prices in the euro area rising more than broader

indexes. In addition, debt issuance by both governments and banks in the European periphery picked up,

and sovereign yield spreads in those countries were flat

to down, on balance, over the period. In contrast,

amid a ratcheting-up of financial market strains in some

emerging market economies, headline stock price indexes in most emerging market economies declined,

outflows from emerging market mutual funds continued, and yield spreads on dollar-denominated emerging

market bonds increased. Local-currency yields rose in

some emerging market economies, such as Brazil,

South Africa, and Turkey, and short-term interbank

rates in China were volatile and trended higher over the

period. The foreign exchange value of the dollar ap-

preciated against most other currencies over the period,

with particularly large increases against the Argentine

peso and the Turkish lira.

Staff Economic Outlook

In the economic projection prepared by the staff for

the January FOMC meeting, growth of real gross domestic product (GDP) in the second half of 2013 was

estimated to have been stronger than the staff had expected, though some of the strength in inventory investment and net exports was possibly transitory. The

staff’s medium-term forecast for real GDP growth was

little revised, on balance, as the momentum implied by

faster GDP growth in the second half of 2013 was

largely offset by a higher projected path for the foreign

exchange value of the dollar. In addition, the staff revised downward its view of the pace at which potential

output had increased over recent years and would increase this year and next. The staff continued to project that real GDP would expand more quickly over the

next few years than in 2013 and that real GDP would

rise faster than potential output. This acceleration in

economic activity was expected to be supported by

still-accommodative monetary policy and an easing in

the effects of fiscal policy restraint on economic

growth, as well as by increases in consumer and business confidence, further improvements in credit availability and financial conditions, and continued gains in

foreign economic growth. The expansion in economic

activity was anticipated to lead to a slow reduction in

resource slack over the projection period, and the unemployment rate was expected to decline gradually,

reaching the staff’s estimate of its longer-run natural

rate in 2016.

The staff’s forecast for inflation was little changed from

the projection prepared for the previous FOMC meeting, although the near-term forecast was revised down

a little to reflect recent declines in energy prices. The

staff continued to forecast that inflation would run well

below the Committee’s 2 percent objective early this

year but above the low level observed over much of

2013. Over the medium term, with longer-run inflation

expectations assumed to remain stable, changes in

commodity and import prices expected to be muted,

and slack in labor and product markets receding gradually, inflation was projected to move back slowly toward the Committee’s objective.

In considering recent events in emerging market economies, the staff judged that the effects of recent financial market volatility had not been large enough to have

a material effect on the overall outlook for those economies and, similarly, that the spillover effects on the

Minutes of the Meeting of January 28–29, 2014

Page 13

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

United States of developments to date were likely to be

modest. Because conditions were in flux, however,

these markets would require careful monitoring.

The staff continued to see a number of risks around its

outlook. The downside risks to the forecast for real

GDP growth were thought to have diminished, but the

risks were still seen as tilted a little to the downside because, with the target federal funds rate at its effective

lower bound, the economy was not well positioned to

withstand future adverse shocks. At the same time, the

staff viewed the risks around its outlook for the unemployment rate and for inflation as roughly balanced.

Participants’ Views on Current Conditions and the

Economic Outlook

In their discussion of the economic situation and the

outlook, participants generally noted that economic

activity had strengthened more in the second half of

2013 than they had expected at the time of the December meeting. In particular, consumer spending had

strengthened, and business investment appeared to be

on a more solid uptrend. Although the government

shutdown likely damped economic growth somewhat,

the extent of restraint on growth from fiscal policy diminished late in the year. However, several participants

observed that temporary factors had helped boost real

GDP during the second half, pointing specifically to

the substantial contributions from net exports and increased inventory investment. As a result, participants

generally did not expect the recent pace of economic

growth to be sustained, but they nonetheless anticipated that the economy would expand at a moderate pace

in coming quarters. That expansion was expected to be

supported by highly accommodative monetary policy, a

further easing of fiscal restraint, and a modest additional pickup in global economic growth, as well as continued improvement in credit conditions and the ongoing

strengthening in household balance sheets. A number

of participants noted that recent economic news had

reinforced their confidence in their projection of moderate economic growth over the medium run. It was

also noted that recent developments in several emerging market economies, if they continued, could pose

downside risks to the outlook. Overall, most participants still viewed the risks to the outlook for the economy and the labor market as having become more

nearly balanced in recent months.

Consumer spending had advanced strongly in late 2013,

contributing importantly to the pickup in growth of

economic activity. This picture was reinforced by survey data that suggested that consumers had become

more optimistic about future income gains. While not-

ing that households remained cautious, participants

cited a number of factors that were likely to continue to

underpin gains in household spending, including rising

house prices, growing confidence in the sustainability

of the economic expansion, increasing payrolls, and the

high ratio of household wealth to disposable income.

Although the recovery in the housing sector had

slowed somewhat in recent months, a number of participants reported solid activity in their Districts.

Moreover, various factors were seen as likely to support stronger growth in the sector going forward, including favorable housing affordability, which was in

turn partly due to still-low mortgage rates, and demographic trends. However, there were also reasons for

being cautious about the prospects for housing construction, such as recent disappointing news on permits

for new construction and the possibility that investors’

interest in purchasing properties for the rental market

would recede.

Business contacts in many parts of the country reported that they were guardedly optimistic about prospects

for 2014. While inventory investment would likely

come down from its recent unusually high level, participants heard more reports that the business sector was

willing to increase spending on capital projects. A

number of factors were cited as likely to support such

an increase, including the high level of profits, the low

level of interest rates, a reduction in policy uncertainty,

the easing of lending standards, and large holdings of

liquid assets by corporations.

In discussing financial developments over the intermeeting period, several participants noted that the

Committee’s December decision to make a modest

reduction in the monthly pace of asset purchases had

not resulted in an adverse market reaction. Several participants observed that current market expectations for

asset purchases and the future course of the federal

funds rate were reasonably well aligned with participants’ own expectations of the path for policy. However, one participant expressed concern that longerterm interest rates could rise sharply if market participants’ expectations of future monetary policy came to

deviate from those of policymakers, as appeared to

have happened last summer, while a couple of others

argued that the current highly accommodative stance of

monetary policy could lead investors to take on excessive risk and so undermine longer-term financial stability. Recent volatility in emerging markets appeared to

have had only a limited effect to date on U.S. financial

markets. Nevertheless, participants agreed that a number of developments in financial markets needed to be

Page 14

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

watched carefully, including the financing situation of

the Puerto Rican government and particularly the unfolding events in emerging markets.

In their discussion of recent labor market developments, many participants commented on the relatively

small increase in payrolls in December and the further

decline in the unemployment rate. A number of participants indicated that the December payrolls figure may

have been an anomaly, perhaps importantly reflecting

bad weather, and it was noted that the initial readings

on payrolls in recent years had subsequently tended to

be revised up. In addition, some participants reported

that their business contacts had become more positive

about hiring in the year ahead. Participants continued

to debate the reliability of the unemployment rate as an

indicator of overall labor market conditions, taking into

account the further decline in labor force participation

in recent quarters, still-elevated levels of underemployment and long-term unemployment, and the apparent absence of wage pressures. Much of the downward trend in the labor force participation rate since

the start of the recession was seen as the result of shifts

in the demographic composition of the workforce and

the retirement of older workers; the extent of the cyclical portion of the decline was viewed by some as difficult to gauge at present. A few participants judged that

the decline in participation for younger and prime-age

workers likely reflected the slow recovery in jobs and

wages and so might be reversed as labor market conditions strengthened. In addition, several others pointed

out that broader concepts of the unemployment rate,

such as those that include nonparticipants who report

that they want a job and those working part time who

want full-time work, remained well above the official

unemployment rate, suggesting that considerable labor

market slack remained despite the reduction in the unemployment rate. A few participants noted worker

shortages in specific regions and occupations, with one

District reporting widespread shortages of skilled labor

leading to emerging labor cost pressures. However, a

number of participants saw the low rates of increase in

most measures of wages as consistent with continued

labor market slack.

Inflation remained below the Committee’s longer-run

objective over the intermeeting period. Participants

still anticipated that, with longer-run inflation expectations stable, transitory factors that had been damping

inflation likely to recede, and economic activity picking

up, inflation would move back toward the Committee’s

2 percent objective over the medium run. However,

several factors that cast doubt on this outcome were

also mentioned, including slow growth in labor costs,

the lack of pricing power reported by business contacts

in various parts of the country, the low level of inflation in other advanced economies, and the danger that

inflation expectations at short and medium horizons

might not be as well anchored as longer-run inflation

expectations. Participants noted that inflation persistently below the Committee’s objective would pose

risks to economic performance and that inflation developments would need to be monitored carefully.

In their discussion of the path for monetary policy,

most participants judged that the incoming information

about the economy was broadly in line with their expectations and that a further modest step down in the

pace of purchases was appropriate. A couple of participants observed that continued low readings on inflation and considerable slack in the labor market raised

questions about the desirability of reducing the pace of

purchases; these participants judged, however, that a

pause in the reduction of purchases was not justified at

this stage, especially in light of the strength of the

economy in the second half of 2013. Several participants argued that, in the absence of an appreciable

change in the economic outlook, there should be a

clear presumption in favor of continuing to reduce the

pace of purchases by a total of $10 billion at each

FOMC meeting. That said, a number of participants

noted that if the economy deviated substantially from

its expected path, the Committee should be prepared to

respond with an appropriate adjustment to the trajectory of its purchases.

Participants agreed that, with the unemployment rate

approaching 6½ percent, it would soon be appropriate

for the Committee to change its forward guidance in

order to provide information about its decisions regarding the federal funds rate after that threshold was

crossed. A range of views was expressed about the

form that such forward guidance might take. Some

participants favored quantitative guidance along the

lines of the existing thresholds, while others preferred a

qualitative approach that would provide additional information regarding the factors that would guide the

Committee’s policy decisions. Several participants suggested that risks to financial stability should appear

more explicitly in the list of factors that would guide

decisions about the federal funds rate once the unemployment rate threshold is crossed, and several participants argued that the forward guidance should give

greater emphasis to the Committee’s willingness to

keep rates low if inflation were to remain persistently

below the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run objective.

Additional proposals included relying to a greater extent on the Summary of Economic Projections as a

Minutes of the Meeting of January 28–29, 2014

Page 15

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

communications device and including in the guidance

an indication of the Committee’s willingness to adjust

policy to lean against undesired changes in financial

conditions.

A few participants raised the possibility that it might be

appropriate to increase the federal funds rate relatively

soon. One participant cited evidence that the equilibrium real interest rate had moved higher, and a couple of

them noted that some standard policy rules tended to

suggest that the federal funds rate should be raised

above its effective lower bound before the middle of

this year. Other participants, however, suggested that

prescriptions from standard policy rules were not appropriate in current circumstances, either because the

target federal funds rate had been constrained by the

lower bound for some time or because the equilibrium

real rate of interest was likely still being held down by

various factors, including the lingering effects of the

financial crisis, and was significantly below the value of

the longer-run rate built into standard policy rules.

Committee Policy Action

Committee members saw the information received

over the intermeeting period as indicating that growth

in economic activity had picked up in recent quarters.

Labor market indicators were mixed but on balance

showed further improvement. The unemployment rate

had declined but remained elevated when judged

against members’ estimates of the longer-run normal

rate of unemployment. Household spending and business fixed investment had advanced more quickly in

recent months than earlier in 2013, while the recovery

in the housing sector had slowed somewhat. Fiscal

policy was restraining economic growth, although the

extent of the restraint had diminished. The Committee

expected that, with appropriate policy accommodation,

the economy would expand at a moderate pace and the

unemployment rate would gradually decline toward

levels consistent with the dual mandate. Moreover,

members continued to judge that the risks to the outlook for the economy and the labor market had become more nearly balanced. Inflation was running below the Committee’s longer-run objective, and this was

seen as posing possible risks to economic performance,

but members anticipated that stable inflation expectations and strengthening economic activity would, over

time, return inflation to the Committee’s 2 percent objective. However, in light of their concerns about the

persistence of low inflation, many members saw a need

for the Committee to monitor inflation developments

carefully for evidence that inflation was moving back

toward its longer-run objective.

In their discussion of monetary policy in the period

ahead, all members agreed that the cumulative improvement in labor market conditions and the likelihood of continuing improvement indicated that it

would be appropriate to make a further measured reduction in the pace of its asset purchases at this meeting. Members again judged that, if the economy continued to develop as anticipated, further reductions

would be undertaken in measured steps. Members also

underscored that the pace of asset purchases was not

on a preset course and would remain contingent on the

Committee’s outlook for the labor market and inflation

as well as its assessment of the efficacy and costs of

purchases. Accordingly, the Committee agreed that,

beginning in February, it would add to its holdings of

agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $30 billion per month rather than $35 billion per month, and

would add to its holdings of longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of $35 billion per month rather than

$40 billion per month. While making a further measured reduction in its pace of purchases, the Committee

emphasized that its holdings of longer-term securities

were sizable and would still be increasing, which would

promote a stronger economic recovery by maintaining

downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, supporting mortgage markets, and helping to make broader financial conditions more accommodative. The

Committee also reiterated that it would continue its

asset purchases, and employ its other policy tools as

appropriate, until the outlook for the labor market has

improved substantially in a context of price stability.

In considering forward guidance about the target federal funds rate, all members agreed to retain the thresholds-based language employed in recent statements. In

addition, the Committee decided to repeat the qualitative guidance, introduced in December, clarifying that a

range of labor market indicators would be used when

assessing the appropriate stance of policy once the unemployment rate threshold had been crossed. Members also agreed to reiterate language indicating the

Committee’s anticipation, based on its current assessment of additional measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation

expectations, and readings on financial developments,

that it would be appropriate to maintain the current

target range for the federal funds rate well past the time

that the unemployment rate declines below 6½ percent,

especially if projected inflation continues to run below

the Committee’s longer-run objective.

Members also discussed other elements of the policy

statement to be issued following the meeting. Members agreed on updating the description of the state of

Page 16

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

the economy to reflect the recent strength of household and business spending and to note that, although

the labor market showed further improvement on balance, the recent indicators were mixed. Members did

not see an appreciable change in the balance of risks

and so left the statement’s description of risks unchanged.

At the conclusion of the discussion, the Committee

voted to authorize and direct the Federal Reserve Bank

of New York, until it was instructed otherwise, to execute transactions in the SOMA in accordance with the

following domestic policy directive:

“Consistent with its statutory mandate, the

Federal Open Market Committee seeks

monetary and financial conditions that will

foster maximum employment and price stability. In particular, the Committee seeks

conditions in reserve markets consistent with

federal funds trading in a range from 0 to

¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk

to undertake open market operations as necessary to maintain such conditions. Beginning in February, the Desk is directed to

purchase longer-term Treasury securities at a

pace of about $35 billion per month and to

purchase agency mortgage-backed securities

at a pace of about $30 billion per month.

The Committee also directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll and coupon swap transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of

the Federal Reserve’s agency mortgagebacked securities transactions. The Committee directs the Desk to maintain its policy of

rolling over maturing Treasury securities into

new issues and its policy of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency

mortgage-backed securities in agency

mortgage-backed securities. The System

Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of

ongoing developments regarding the System’s balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee’s objectives of maximum employment and price

stability.”

The vote encompassed approval of the statement below to be released at 2:00 p.m.:

“Information received since the Federal

Open Market Committee met in December

indicates that growth in economic activity

picked up in recent quarters. Labor market

indicators were mixed but on balance

showed further improvement. The unemployment rate declined but remains elevated.

Household spending and business fixed investment advanced more quickly in recent

months, while the recovery in the housing

sector slowed somewhat. Fiscal policy is restraining economic growth, although the extent of restraint is diminishing. Inflation has

been running below the Committee’s longerrun objective, but longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

Consistent with its statutory mandate, the

Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee

expects that, with appropriate policy accommodation, economic activity will expand

at a moderate pace and the unemployment

rate will gradually decline toward levels the

Committee judges consistent with its dual

mandate. The Committee sees the risks to

the outlook for the economy and the labor

market as having become more nearly balanced. The Committee recognizes that inflation persistently below its 2 percent objective

could pose risks to economic performance,

and it is monitoring inflation developments

carefully for evidence that inflation will move

back toward its objective over the medium

term.

Taking into account the extent of federal fiscal retrenchment since the inception of its

current asset purchase program, the Committee continues to see the improvement in

economic activity and labor market conditions over that period as consistent with

growing underlying strength in the broader

economy. In light of the cumulative progress toward maximum employment and the

improvement in the outlook for labor market

conditions, the Committee decided to make a

further measured reduction in the pace of its

asset purchases. Beginning in February, the

Committee will add to its holdings of agency

mortgage-backed securities at a pace of

$30 billion per month rather than $35 billion

per month, and will add to its holdings of

longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of

$35 billion per month rather than $40 billion

per month. The Committee is maintaining

its existing policy of reinvesting principal

payments from its holdings of agency debt

Minutes of the Meeting of January 28–29, 2014

Page 17

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

and agency mortgage-backed securities in

agency mortgage-backed securities and of

rolling over maturing Treasury securities at

auction. The Committee’s sizable and stillincreasing holdings of longer-term securities

should maintain downward pressure on

longer-term interest rates, support mortgage

markets, and help to make broader financial

conditions more accommodative, which in

turn should promote a stronger economic

recovery and help to ensure that inflation,

over time, is at the rate most consistent with

the Committee’s dual mandate.

The Committee will closely monitor incoming information on economic and financial

developments in coming months and will

continue its purchases of Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities, and employ

its other policy tools as appropriate, until the

outlook for the labor market has improved

substantially in a context of price stability. If

incoming information broadly supports the

Committee’s expectation of ongoing improvement in labor market conditions and

inflation moving back toward its longer-run

objective, the Committee will likely reduce

the pace of asset purchases in further measured steps at future meetings. However, asset purchases are not on a preset course, and

the Committee’s decisions about their pace

will remain contingent on the Committee’s

outlook for the labor market and inflation as

well as its assessment of the likely efficacy

and costs of such purchases.

To support continued progress toward maximum employment and price stability, the

Committee today reaffirmed its view that a

highly accommodative stance of monetary

policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time after the asset purchase program

ends and the economic recovery strengthens.

The Committee also reaffirmed its expectation that the current exceptionally low target

range for the federal funds rate of 0 to

¼ percent will be appropriate at least as long

as the unemployment rate remains above

6½ percent, inflation between one and two

years ahead is projected to be no more than a

half percentage point above the Committee’s

2 percent longer-run goal, and longer-term

inflation expectations continue to be well anchored. In determining how long to maintain a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy, the Committee will also consider

other information, including additional

measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments. The Committee continues to anticipate, based on its assessment of these factors, that it likely will be appropriate to maintain the current target range for the federal

funds rate well past the time that the unemployment rate declines below 6½ percent,

especially if projected inflation continues to

run below the Committee’s 2 percent longerrun goal. When the Committee decides to

begin to remove policy accommodation, it

will take a balanced approach consistent with

its longer-run goals of maximum employment and inflation of 2 percent.”

Voting for this action: Ben Bernanke, William C.

Dudley, Richard W. Fisher, Narayana Kocherlakota,

Sandra Pianalto, Charles I. Plosser, Jerome H. Powell,

Jeremy C. Stein, Daniel K. Tarullo, and Janet L. Yellen.

Voting against this action: None.

It was agreed that the next meeting of the Committee

would be held on Tuesday–Wednesday, March 18–19,

2014. The meeting adjourned at 10:55 a.m. on

January 29, 2014.

Notation Vote

By notation vote completed on January 7, 2014, the

Committee unanimously approved the minutes of the

Committee meeting held on December 17–18, 2013.

_____________________________

William B. English

Secretary

Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (2014, January 28). FOMC Minutes. Fomc Minutes, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/fomc_minutes_20140129
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_fomc_minutes_20140129,
  author = {Federal Reserve},
  title = {FOMC Minutes},
  year = {2014},
  month = {Jan},
  howpublished = {Fomc Minutes, Federal Reserve},
  url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/fomc_minutes_20140129},
  note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}