FOMC Minutes
Page 1
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee
March 15, 2020
A joint meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee
and the Board of Governors was held by videoconference on Sunday, March 15, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. 1
PRESENT:
Jerome H. Powell, Chair
John C. Williams, Vice Chair
Michelle W. Bowman
Lael Brainard
Richard H. Clarida
Patrick Harker
Robert S. Kaplan
Neel Kashkari
Loretta J. Mester
Randal K. Quarles
Thomas I. Barkin, Raphael W. Bostic, Mary C. Daly,
and Charles L. Evans, Alternate Members of the
Federal Open Market Committee
James Bullard, Esther L. George, and Eric Rosengren,
Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of St.
Louis, Kansas City, and Boston, respectively
James A. Clouse, Secretary
Matthew M. Luecke, Deputy Secretary
Michelle A. Smith, Assistant Secretary
Mark E. Van Der Weide, General Counsel
Michael Held, Deputy General Counsel
Thomas Laubach, Economist
Stacey Tevlin, Economist
Beth Anne Wilson, Economist
Shaghil Ahmed, Michael Dotsey, Joseph W. Gruber,
Beverly Hirtle, David E. Lebow, Trevor A. Reeve,
and Ellis W. Tallman, Associate Economists
Lorie K. Logan, Manager, System Open Market
Account
Ann E. Misback, Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Board of Governors
Matthew J. Eichner, Director, Division of Reserve
Bank Operations and Payment Systems, Board of
The Federal Open Market Committee is referenced as the
“FOMC” and the “Committee” in these minutes.
1
Governors; Michael S. Gibson, Director, Division
of Supervision and Regulation, Board of
Governors; Andreas Lehnert, Director, Division of
Financial Stability, Board of Governors
Daniel M. Covitz, Deputy Director, Division of
Research and Statistics, Board of Governors;
Rochelle M. Edge, Deputy Director, Division of
Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors; Michael T.
Kiley, Deputy Director, Division of Financial
Stability, Board of Governors
Jon Faust, Senior Special Adviser to the Chair, Office
of Board Members, Board of Governors
Joshua Gallin, Special Adviser to the Chair, Office of
Board Members, Board of Governors
Antulio N. Bomfim, Brian M. Doyle, Wendy E. Dunn,
and Ellen E. Meade, Special Advisers to the Board,
Office of Board Members, Board of Governors
Linda Robertson, Assistant to the Board, Office of
Board Members, Board of Governors
Edward Nelson, Senior Adviser, Division of Monetary
Affairs, Board of Governors
Andrew Figura and John M. Roberts, Deputy Associate
Directors, Division of Research and Statistics,
Board of Governors
Rebecca Zarutskie, Assistant Director, Division of
Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Brett Berger, Adviser, Division of International
Finance, Board of Governors
Randall A. Williams, Senior Information Manager,
Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Jose Acosta, Senior Communications Analyst, Division
of Information Technology, Board of Governors
Page 2
Federal Open Market Committee
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Ellen J. Bromagen and Ron Feldman, First Vice
Presidents, Federal Reserve Banks of Chicago and
Minneapolis, respectively
Kartik B. Athreya, Anna Paulson, Daleep Singh, and
Christopher J. Waller, Executive Vice Presidents,
Federal Reserve Banks of Richmond, Chicago,
New York, and St. Louis, respectively
Paula Tkac, Robert G. Valletta, and Nathaniel
Wuerffel, Senior Vice Presidents, Federal Reserve
Banks of Atlanta, San Francisco, and New York,
respectively
George A. Kahn, Matthew D. Raskin, and Patricia
Zobel, Vice Presidents, Federal Reserve Banks of
Kansas City, New York, and New York,
respectively
Karel Mertens, Senior Economic Policy Advisor,
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Developments in Financial Markets and Open
Market Operations
The System Open Market Account (SOMA) manager
first reviewed developments in domestic and global financial markets. Financial markets remained exceptionally volatile amid the global spread of the coronavirus
and uncertainty regarding its effects. Since the meeting
of the FOMC in late January, the S&P 500 index declined 18 percent, nominal U.S. Treasury yields moved
60 to 100 basis points lower, and market-based measures
of inflation compensation fell 75 to 100 basis points.
Investment-grade and high-yield credit spreads widened
about 120 basis points and 360 basis points, respectively.
The U.S. dollar appreciated notably against most currencies, with the exception of other safe-haven currencies,
and crude oil prices dropped 40 percent. Against this
backdrop, expectations for the path of the federal funds
rate adjusted sharply. Implied rates on federal funds futures contracts suggested the Committee was expected
to reduce the target range 1 full percentage point at its
upcoming scheduled meeting following the 50 basis
point reduction in the target range in early March. In
addition, market participants reportedly anticipated that
the Committee would announce additional purchases of
Treasury securities and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS).
Trading conditions across a range of markets were severely strained. In corporate bond markets, trading activity and liquidity were at very low levels, although not
back to the low point reached in 2008. Market participants expected that actions taken to slow the spread of
the virus could have significant effects on the credit worthiness of certain borrowers, particularly those at the
lower end of the credit spectrum. Market participants
also increasingly pointed to concerns in other segments
of the debt market. In securitized markets, including
those for asset-backed securities (ABS) and commercial
mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), primary market issuance slowed, and secondary market trading had become less orderly, with money managers selling shortdated liquid products to meet investor redemptions.
In the Treasury market, following several consecutive
days of deteriorating conditions, market participants reported an acute decline in market liquidity. A number
of primary dealers found it especially difficult to make
markets in off-the-run Treasury securities and reported
that this segment of the market had ceased to function
effectively. This disruption in intermediation was attributed, in part, to sales of off-the-run Treasury securities and flight-to-quality flows into the most liquid,
on-the-run Treasury securities.
Conditions in short-term funding markets also deteriorated sharply amid a decline in market liquidity and challenges in dealer intermediation. Over recent days, the
premium paid to obtain dollars through the foreign exchange swap market increased sharply, and the volumes
in term repurchase agreement (repo) markets dropped
significantly. Issuance of commercial paper (CP) maturing beyond one week reportedly almost dried up at the
end of the week before the meeting, and primary- and
secondary-market liquidity for financial and nonfinancial
CP was described as nearly nonexistent at a time when
investor concern about issuer credit risk was rising.
The manager then summarized actions taken by the
Desk to address some of the strains in financial markets.
Repo lending operations were greatly expanded to address the acute worsening in term funding markets; these
operations included the addition of large-scale one- and
three-month term repo operations. Despite the sizable
offering of additional term repo, take-up was well below
the offered amounts, and there was little improvement
in Treasury market functioning. As a result, the Chair,
in consultation with the FOMC, instructed the Desk to
conduct purchases of Treasury securities across a range
of maturities. The Desk also revised the schedule of
Treasury purchases, announcing that $37 billion of the
monthly scheduled purchases would be completed on
Friday, March 13. These purchases were conducted
across the curve. Market participants suggested that the
Minutes of the Meeting of March 15, 2020
Page 3
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
operations had been helpful in addressing some funding
pressures, but trading conditions in Treasury, mortgage,
and credit markets remained severely strained. The
SOMA manager noted that, if the FOMC directed the
Desk to conduct additional purchases of MBS and
Treasury securities, the Desk could initially conduct such
purchases at a more rapid pace to more quickly address
liquidity strains.
By unanimous vote, the Committee ratified the Desk’s
domestic transactions over the intermeeting period. No
intervention operations occurred in foreign currencies
for the System’s account during the intermeeting period.
Staff Review of the Economic Situation
The coronavirus outbreak was disrupting economic activity in many countries, including the United States, by
the time of the March 15 meeting. There were limited
available U.S. economic data, however, that covered the
period since the intensification of concerns about the
domestic effects of the outbreak. Information that predated that period indicated that labor market conditions
had remained strong through February and that real
gross domestic product (GDP) appeared to have been
increasing at a moderate pace in the first two months of
the year. Consumer price inflation, as measured by the
12-month percentage change in the price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE), remained below
2 percent in January. Survey-based measures of longerrun inflation expectations were little changed.
Total nonfarm payroll employment expanded strongly in
January and February, and the unemployment rate was
at its 50-year low of 3.5 percent in February. Meanwhile,
the labor force participation rate and the employmentto-population ratio edged up on net. Initial claims for
unemployment insurance benefits—a timely indicator of
a deterioration in labor market conditions—remained
near historically low levels through early March, which
was still before economic shutdowns started to take
place in the United States. Nominal wage growth was
moderate on balance. Average hourly earnings for all
employees increased 3 percent over the 12 months ending in February. The employment cost index for privatesector workers increased 2.7 percent over the 12 months
ending in December, while total labor compensation per
hour in the business sector—a highly volatile measure of
wage gains—rose 3.6 percent over the four quarters of
last year.
Total consumer prices, as measured by the PCE price
index, increased 1.7 percent over the 12 months ending
in January. Core PCE price inflation (which excludes
changes in consumer food and energy prices) was
1.6 percent over that same 12-month period. The
trimmed mean measure of 12-month PCE price inflation constructed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
was 2.1 percent in January. The consumer price index
(CPI) rose 2.3 percent over the 12 months ending in
February, and the core CPI increased 2.4 percent over
that same period. Recent readings on survey-based
measures of longer-run inflation expectations were little
changed, on balance, in recent months. The Survey of
Professional Forecasters measure for the next 10 years
was unchanged in the first quarter, as was the longer-run
measure from the Blue Chip survey in March. The University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers measure for
the next 5 to 10 years edged down in February and remained in the lower part of its prevailing range in early
March. The three-year-ahead measure from the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York’s Survey of Consumer Expectations edged up in February and remained in its recent range.
Real PCE growth was moderate in January. The components of the nominal retail sales data used to estimate
PCE edged down in February, and the pace of sales of
light motor vehicles in January and February was above
its fourth-quarter average. However, the consumer sentiment measure from the Michigan survey started to decline notably in early March, and other daily and weekly
sentiment measures—such as the Bloomberg Consumer
Comfort Index, the Morning Consult confidence index,
and the Rasmussen Consumer Index—were also deteriorating.
Both starts and building permit issuance for singlefamily homes increased in January over their fourthquarter averages, and starts of multifamily units also
moved up. New and existing home sales in January were
both above their average fourth-quarter levels.
Nominal shipments and new orders of nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft increased solidly in January,
although the anticipated resumption of deliveries of the
Boeing 737 Max was delayed until later in the year.
Nominal business expenditures for nonresidential structures outside of the drilling and mining sector increased
in January. The total number of crude oil and natural
gas rigs in operation—an indicator of business spending
for structures in the drilling and mining sector—was
edging up through mid-March and was not yet showing
any of the expected falloff from the recent sharp declines
in crude oil prices.
The available data suggested that manufacturing production moved up in February after edging down in January,
leaving the level of factory output little changed, on net,
Page 4
Federal Open Market Committee
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
over the past 12 months. Although output in the mining
sector—which includes crude oil extraction—had increased in January, available data indicated that output in
this sector would decrease in February; the recent sharp
declines in crude oil prices pointed to a reduction in mining-sector production over at least the near term.
Total real government purchases appeared to be increasing moderately. Federal defense spending rose in January and February, and federal employment was boosted
by hiring for the 2020 census. State and local government payrolls expanded strongly in January and February, and nominal construction spending by these governments increased solidly in January.
The nominal U.S. international trade deficit narrowed in
January, as a steep fall in imports more than offset a decline in exports. The fall in imports, which followed a
sizable fourth-quarter decline, was led by lower imports
of industrial supplies, automotive products, and capital
goods. The decline in exports was driven by lower exports of capital goods and industrial supplies. Available
indicators suggested that both exports and imports likely
declined in February, in part reflecting disruptions related to the coronavirus outbreak.
The pace of economic growth abroad was already subdued before the outbreak. In the advanced foreign
economies (AFEs), real GDP growth had slowed
sharply at the end of 2019, and indicators pointed to only
a modest pickup in economic growth early this year. In
the emerging market economies (EMEs), incoming data
had been more positive, as indicators for high-tech and
manufacturing production in Asian economies outside
of China were upbeat, and the effects of social protests
in Chile and Hong Kong, along with the effects of the
General Motors strike on Mexican economic activity,
had faded. By early February, however, the coronavirus
outbreak in China brought economic activity in many
parts of the country to a standstill. Hubei province, the
epicenter of the outbreak and a manufacturing hub, was
put under quarantine, and factories across the country
were shut down. Foreign economic indicators for the
more recent period, following the spread of the virus to
the rest of the world, were generally not yet available.
However, widespread shutdowns together with lower
commodity prices and tighter financial conditions suggested that activity was weakening sharply in most foreign economies.
Staff Review of the Financial Situation
Concerns about the coronavirus outbreak dominated financial market developments at home and abroad over
the intermeeting period. Equity prices, sovereign yields,
and the market-implied expected trajectory of the federal
funds rate all plummeted, and the volatility of asset
prices soared. Late in the intermeeting period, shortterm funding markets showed signs of stress, with elevated demand for repo funding and increased short-term
spreads. Trading conditions for Treasury securities and
MBS were impaired. Moreover, primary issuance of
investment-grade corporate bonds was sporadic, and
that of speculative-grade corporate bonds and leveraged
loans virtually stopped after late February. Data from
before the escalation of coronavirus concerns in late
February suggested that financial conditions for nonfinancial businesses and for households had generally remained supportive of economic activity and spending,
but developments late in the intermeeting period
pointed to tightening credit conditions.
Expectations for the path of the federal funds rate declined sharply over the intermeeting period. Toward the
end of the period, a straight read of overnight index
swap (OIS) quotes suggested that the federal funds rate
would remain below 25 basis points at least until the
middle of 2021. After the 50 basis point decrease in the
target range on March 3, prices of federal funds futures
options suggested that investors assigned a significant
probability to the target range decreasing to 0 to 25 basis
points at or before the scheduled March meeting.
Yields on nominal Treasury securities plummeted across
the maturity spectrum, with the 10- and 30-year yields
reaching all-time lows at some point. A staff term structure model largely attributed the decline in the 10-year
yield to lower expected future short-term rates.
Measures of inflation compensation based on Treasury
Inflation-Protected Securities fell sharply and reached a
historical low at the 5-to-10-year horizon late in the intermeeting period.
Uncertainty regarding future interest rates increased
sharply over the intermeeting period. At one point, the
one-month-ahead swaption-implied volatility of the
10-year swap rate surpassed its highest level seen during
the “taper tantrum” episode in mid-2013. Treasury market functioning was severely impaired late in the intermeeting period, with some dealers reportedly unwilling
to make markets for clients and the normal linkage between cash and futures markets broken. Market depth
was extremely thin, and bid-ask spreads widened sharply.
Broad stock price indexes plummeted because of a flight
to safety amid escalating concerns about global economic activity. Although the declines were broad based,
the airline, energy, and bank sectors were among the
worst performers. Stock price indexes were extremely
Minutes of the Meeting of March 15, 2020
Page 5
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
volatile, and the one-month option-implied volatility on
the S&P 500 index soared, sometimes reaching levels
not seen since the fall of 2008. Corporate bond spreads
over comparable-maturity Treasury yields widened significantly, and spreads on speculative-grade energy
bonds widened especially sharply amid plunging oil
prices.
The 50 basis point decrease in the target range for the
federal funds rate announced on March 3 passed
through fully to overnight unsecured and secured rates.
Conditions in domestic short-term funding markets
showed signs of funding strains late in the intermeeting
period. The rates on unsecured CP and negotiable certificates of deposit with maturities exceeding one month
increased sharply relative to OIS rates, with pronounced
effects for issuers in the energy and transportation sectors. Overnight and term repo rates were elevated late
in the intermeeting period, and the take-up of the Federal Reserve’s repo operations increased substantially for
both overnight and term operations.
Over the intermeeting period, foreign risk asset prices
plummeted amid a rapid deterioration of investor sentiment due to the global spread of the coronavirus. Major
foreign equity indexes dropped sharply over the intermeeting period, while option-implied volatility measures
climbed to their highest levels since the Global Financial
Crisis. EME fund outflows accelerated late in the period
as emerging market bond spreads widened notably.
Most AFE long-term sovereign yields ended the period
notably lower. Inflation compensation in the euro area
reached new lows. In response to the economic effect
of the virus, several central banks cut policy rates and
injected liquidity.
The broad dollar index strengthened notably over the
period, boosted by safe-haven demand, predominantly
against EME currencies, and despite a significant decline
in U.S. yields. Safe-haven demand also bolstered the
Japanese yen and Swiss franc. Policy actions by Chinese
authorities supported the Chinese renminbi, which depreciated about 1.5 percent against the dollar on net.
Other EME currencies, such as the Brazilian real and
Mexican peso, depreciated sharply, as market participants viewed them as particularly vulnerable to a global
economic slowdown and declining commodity prices.
Oil prices declined over 40 percent on expectations of
lower demand due to the virus outbreak and an unexpected price cut by Saudi Arabia amid a breakdown of
negotiations between OPEC and Russia to reduce production levels.
Financing conditions for nonfinancial firms were
strained over the late part of the intermeeting period.
After robust issuance earlier in the first quarter, corporate bond issuance came to a near standstill around late
February in the midst of elevated volatility following the
escalation of concerns about the coronavirus outbreak.
Later in the intermeeting period, investment-grade bond
issuance resumed intermittently, but speculative-grade
issuance and leveraged loan issuance virtually stopped.
In addition, some firms reportedly postponed plans to
go public. Commercial and industrial loan growth was
modest. Credit quality indicators for nonfinancial corporations had been solid earlier in the quarter but deteriorated following the escalation of the coronavirus outbreak, particularly for the speculative-grade and energy
segments of the market. Measures of the year-ahead expected default rate increased in March to levels slightly
under those observed during the oil price plunge in early
2016, reflecting higher expected default rates among
speculative-grade firms as well as energy firms. In addition, the outlook for corporate earnings deteriorated
somewhat, as equity analysts revised down their earnings
per share estimates a notch, and several firms warned
that the coronavirus outbreak could hurt their earnings
and make them difficult to predict. The supply of credit
to small businesses over the fourth quarter of last year
had remained relatively accommodative, but loan originations ticked down in January, consistent with ongoing
reports of weak loan demand.
Market turmoil spilled into municipal bond markets late
in the intermeeting period, as spreads widened substantially and some borrowers became hesitant to come to
the market. Credit conditions in the municipal market
had been accommodative over the early part of the intermeeting period, and issuance volumes in late February
were reportedly boosted by strong investor demand for
low-risk assets.
Financing conditions in the commercial real estate
(CRE) sector worsened late in the intermeeting period,
as issuance of CMBS slowed and spreads widened notably to around levels seen in 2016. Data from before the
escalation of concerns over the coronavirus outbreak
pointed to accommodative financing conditions. CRE
loan growth at banks remained solid through February
and CRE debt outstanding increased modestly through
mid-February, according to available data.
The primary mortgage rate increased sharply toward the
end of the period as MBS market liquidity deteriorated,
after falling substantially in February and early March.
Capacity constraints at mortgage originators reportedly
Page 6
Federal Open Market Committee
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
intensified, while borrower interest in refinancing increased significantly from already elevated levels. Moreover, additional constraints emerged as it became more
difficult to conduct operations that usually happen faceto-face.
Financing conditions in consumer credit markets worsened late in the intermeeting period. Strains began appearing in consumer ABS markets, although less so than
in other fixed-income markets. In March, consumer
ABS spreads widened sharply, liquidity deteriorated, and
new issuance became sporadic. Lenders in consumer
credit markets began developing programs to assist borrowers whose finances were affected by the outbreak.
Earlier in the intermeeting period, financing conditions
had been generally supportive of growth. Credit card
balances and auto loan balances both appeared to grow
solidly through February, according to banks’ data, continuing their growth in the fourth quarter. Conditions
for subprime credit card borrowers remained relatively
tight but showed some signs of easing.
Staff Economic Outlook
The projection for the U.S. economy prepared by the
staff for the March FOMC meeting was downgraded significantly from the January meeting forecast in response
to news on the spread of the coronavirus at home and
abroad and in response to a related substantial markdown of the staff’s foreign economic outlook, along
with recent financial market movements. Real GDP was
forecast to decline and the unemployment rate to rise,
on net, in the first half of this year. Given the downside
risks and the elevated uncertainty about how much the
economy would weaken and how long it would take to
recover, the staff provided two plausible economic scenarios that spanned a range of possibilities. Importantly,
the future performance of the economy would depend
on the evolution of the virus outbreak and the measures
undertaken to contain it. In one scenario, economic activity started to rebound in the second half of this year.
In a more adverse scenario, the economy entered recession this year, with a recovery much slower to take hold
and not materially under way until next year. In both
scenarios, inflation was projected to weaken, reflecting
both the deterioration in resource utilization and sizable
expected declines in consumer energy prices.
Participants’ Views on Current Conditions and the
Economic Outlook
Participants noted that the coronavirus outbreak was
harming communities and disrupting economic activity
in many countries, including the United States, and that
global financial conditions had also been significantly affected. Participants expressed their deep concern for
those whose health had been harmed and observed that
the matter was, above all, a public health emergency.
They commented that the measures—such as social distancing—taken in response to the pandemic, while
needed to contain the outbreak, would nevertheless take
a toll on U.S. economic activity in the near term.
Participants noted that available economic data showed
that the U.S. economy came into this challenging period
on a strong footing. Information received since the
Committee met in January indicated that the labor market remained strong through February and that economic activity rose at a moderate rate. Job gains had
been solid, on average, in recent months, and the unemployment rate had remained low. Although household
spending had risen at a moderate pace, business fixed
investment and exports had remained weak; furthermore, in recent weeks the energy sector had come under
stress due to the sharp drop in oil prices. On a 12-month
basis, overall inflation and inflation for items other than
food and energy had been running below 2 percent.
Survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations had been little changed. However, market-based
measures of inflation compensation had declined.
All participants viewed the near-term U.S. economic
outlook as having deteriorated sharply in recent weeks
and as having become profoundly uncertain. Many participants had repeatedly downgraded their outlook of
late in response to the rapidly evolving situation. All saw
U.S. economic activity as likely to decline in the coming
quarter and viewed downside risks to the economic outlook as having increased significantly. Participants noted
that the timing of the resumption of growth in the U.S.
economy depended on the containment measures put in
place, as well as the success of those measures, and on
the responses of other policies, including fiscal policy.
With regard to households’ behavior, participants noted
that, although consumption spending had been a key
driver of growth in economic activity through the first
two months of this year, the pandemic was starting to
impair consumer confidence and to exert an adverse effect on household balance sheets. Participants reported
that wide-ranging social-distancing measures were in operation or in prospect in their Districts. These
measures—which included temporary closures of some
physical locations, such as stores and restaurants, in
which consumers purchased goods and services—would
have the effect of reducing in-person transactions by
households. Online shopping could substitute for some
Minutes of the Meeting of March 15, 2020
Page 7
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
of this activity but was unlikely to replace it fully. The
housing market was likely to be disrupted by social distancing, by financial uncertainty—including difficulties
that households and businesses would face in meeting
mortgage or rental payments—and by volatility in the
market for MBS. Participants stressed the major downside risk that the spread of the virus might intensify in
those areas of the country currently less affected, thereby
sidelining many more U.S. workers and further damping
purchases by consumers. Participants expressed concern that households with low incomes had less of a savings buffer with which to meet expenses during the interruption to economic activity. This situation made
those households more vulnerable to a downturn in the
economy and tended to magnify the reduction in aggregate demand associated with the nation’s response to the
pandemic.
Participants relayed reports on business sectors already
badly hit by the response to the coronavirus outbreak.
These sectors included those affected by the cancellation
of many events, decisions by firms and households to
reduce travel, government-mandated reductions in entry
from abroad, and cutbacks on economic activity that required in-person interaction. Firms directly affected included those connected to air travel, cruise lines, hotels,
tourism services, sports and recreation, entertainment,
hospitality, and restaurants. In the past week, pullbacks
in purchases at retail stores, except for emergency buying, had reportedly intensified significantly. In addition,
the energy sector had come under stress because of recent large declines in oil prices. Many U.S. businesses
had moved to telework arrangements; other businesses,
however, could not readily shift to telework status or had
limited telework technology. Participants observed that
the coronavirus outbreak had inevitably hurt business
confidence and that the expected length and severity of
the restrictions on economic activity that involved inperson interaction would importantly affect the size of
the response of investment spending to the situation.
Participants expressed concern about the financial strain
that many U.S. firms were under because of the loss of
business and the extraordinary turbulence in financial
markets. With regard to supply chains, many contacts
had reported that some linkages in China had been restored and that they were able to draw on inventory supplies and on alternative supply chains; however, in some
areas of the country, the construction industry had reported continuing disruptions to supply chains from
China. Participants indicated that disruptions in the European economy and recent restrictions on travel from
Europe to the United States would adversely affect the
U.S. economy’s supply chains; so too, if it eventuated,
would a large increase in U.S. worker unavailability because of health reasons. Several participants emphasized
concern about the capacity of the health care system in
the current situation and welcomed measures taken to
prevent the system’s overall capacity from being exceeded.
Participants noted that foreign economic growth for the
first half of this year would be badly hit by the severe
disruptions to economic activity abroad associated with
the response to the coronavirus outbreak, including the
recent measures taken in major European countries.
However, some encouraging signs had come from China
in recent weeks in the form of indications of increasing
production and of more purchases of U.S. goods.
With regard to the labor market, participants noted that
some firms would likely need to cut employment immediately. Other firms, however, were looking for ways to
retain employees during the period of reduced economic
activity, in order to maintain capacity and be able to
ramp up production once the public health crisis abated
and demand rebounded. Measures that reportedly
helped partially substitute for layoffs included the encouragement by employers of voluntary leaves of absence, non-replacement of departing workers, and increased reliance on the delivery of goods to customers
in place of on-site purchases. Participants observed that
businesses would be more likely to lay off workers on a
major scale if the downturn in economic activity came
to be perceived as likely to be protracted. Participants
commented that workers most severely affected in the
current situation were those who were ill, those with low
incomes, those connected to the most hard-hit sectors,
and those with irregular or contingent employment.
They also noted that many workers had jobs that did not
permit working from home.
With regard to inflation, participants noted that it had
been running below the Committee’s 2 percent longerrun objective before the coronavirus outbreak. They remarked that a stronger dollar, weaker demand, and lower
oil prices were factors likely to put downward pressure
on inflation in the period ahead and observed that this
meant that the return of inflation to the Committee’s
2 percent longer-run objective would likely be further
delayed. Participants indicated, however, that implementing a more accommodative stance of monetary policy at this meeting could be useful in helping offset these
factors over time and in achieving the 2 percent inflation
Page 8
Federal Open Market Committee
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
objective over the longer run, by helping prevent circumstances of persistent resource slack or a lasting decline in inflation expectations.
Participants all agreed that the effects of the pandemic
would weigh on economic activity in the near term and
that the duration of this period of weakness was uncertain. They further concurred that the unpredictable effects of the coronavirus outbreak were a source of major
downside risks to the economic outlook. Participants
raised several alternative scenarios with regard to the
likely behavior of economic activity in the second half of
this year. These scenarios differed from one another in
the assumed length and severity of disruptions to economic activity. Several participants emphasized that the
temporary nature of the shock to economic activity, the
fact that the shock arose in the nonfinancial sector, and
the healthy state of the U.S. banking system all implied
that the current situation was not directly comparable
with the previous decade’s financial crisis and it need not
be followed by negative effects on economic activity as
long-lasting as those associated with that crisis. Participants stressed that measures taken in the areas of health
care policy and fiscal policy, together with actions by the
private sector, would be important in shaping the timing
and speed of the U.S. economy’s return to normal conditions. Participants agreed that the Federal Reserve’s
efforts to relieve stress in financial markets would help
limit downside near-term outcomes by supporting credit
flows to households and businesses, and that a more accommodative monetary policy stance would provide
support to economic activity beyond the near term.
Among the downside risks to this year’s U.S. economic
outlook, participants prominently cited the possibility of
the virus outbreak becoming more widespread than expected. Such an event could lead to more wide-ranging
temporary shutdowns, with adverse implications for the
production of goods and services and for aggregate demand.
With regard to financial developments over the intermeeting period, participants noted that financial markets
had exhibited extraordinary turbulence and stresses.
Participants commented on the conditions of high volatility and illiquidity characterizing the markets for U.S.
Treasury securities, especially off-the-run longer-term
securities, and for agency MBS. Participants expressed
concern about the disruptions to the functioning of
these markets, especially in view of their status as cornerstones for the operation of the U.S. and global financial systems and for the transmission of monetary policy.
Participants observed that Federal Reserve operations in
recent days had provided some relief with regard to the
liquidity problems, but they noted that severe illiquidity
continued to prevail in key securities markets. Many participants pointed to other dislocations in funding markets that could impede financial intermediation to
households and businesses. They highlighted the acute
problems that many firms were facing in issuing CP and
corporate bonds. Participants further noted that many
businesses were tapping their backup credit lines with
commercial banks. Participants also discussed the implications of recent financial market turbulence for
money market funds and government bond funds and
for debt issuance by state and local governments.
In their consideration of monetary policy at this meeting,
most participants judged that it would be appropriate to
lower the target range for the federal funds rate by
100 basis points, to 0 to ¼ percent. In discussing the
reasons for such a decision, these participants pointed to
a likely decline in economic activity in the near term related to the effects of the coronavirus outbreak and the
extremely large degree of uncertainty regarding how long
and severe such a decline in activity would be. In light
of the sharply increased downside risks to the economic
outlook posed by the global coronavirus outbreak, these
participants noted that risk-management considerations
pointed toward a forceful monetary policy response,
with the majority favoring a 100 basis point cut that
would bring the target range to its effective lower bound
(ELB). With regard to monetary policy beyond this
meeting, these participants judged that it would be appropriate to maintain the target range for the federal
funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent until policymakers were confident that the economy had weathered recent events
and was on track to achieve the Committee’s maximum
employment and price stability goals.
A few participants preferred a 50 basis point cut at this
meeting and noted that such a decision would provide
support to economic activity in the face of the anticipated effects of the coronavirus. These participants preferred to wait until there was greater assurance that the
transmission mechanism of monetary policy via financial
markets and the supply of credit to households and businesses was working effectively. This would allow fiscal
and public health policy responses to the coronavirus
outbreak to take hold and preserve the ability of the
Committee to lower the target range, which was close to
the ELB, in the event of a further deterioration in the
economic outlook. In addition, these participants noted
that a lowering of the target range by 100 basis points,
coming so soon after the reduction of 50 basis points
less than two weeks earlier, ran the risk of sending an
overly negative signal about the economic outlook.
Minutes of the Meeting of March 15, 2020
Page 9
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Participants also considered open market operations to
purchase Treasury securities and agency MBS to support
the smooth functioning of these securities markets,
which in turn would help support the supply of credit to
households and businesses. Participants generally
agreed that, over the coming months, it would be appropriate to increase the Federal Reserve’s holdings of
Treasury securities by at least $500 billion and its holdings of agency MBS by at least $200 billion. Additionally, all principal payments from the Federal Reserve’s
holdings of agency debt and agency MBS would be reinvested in agency MBS. Those Treasury and agency MBS
purchases would be in addition to the recently expanded
overnight and term repo operations conducted by the
Desk. Participants stressed that it was important to
communicate that the Committee would be prepared to
increase the size of the securities purchases, as needed,
on the basis of its close monitoring of market conditions. Some participants noted that it was important to
stress in communications that the primary purpose of
these asset purchases was to support the smooth functioning of Treasury and agency MBS markets rather than
to provide further monetary policy accommodation by
pushing down longer-term yields. A couple of participants noted that because some of the purchases would
be at longer maturities, the purchases could provide
some accommodation by lowering longer-term yields.
Participants discussed some of the possible communications challenges associated with the Committee’s policy
decisions at this meeting. Several participants noted that
it would be important to communicate clearly and consistently about the rationale for the policy decisions
taken at this meeting. Some participants remarked that
the Committee’s policy actions regarding the target
range and balance sheet could be interpreted as conveying negative news about the economic outlook. A few
participants also remarked that lowering the target range
to the ELB could increase the likelihood that some market interest rates would turn negative, or foster investor
expectations of negative policy rates. Such expectations
would run counter to participants’ previously expressed
views that they would prefer to use other monetary policy tools to provide further accommodation at the ELB.
Additionally, several participants remarked that the public might view the ability of the Committee to provide
further monetary policy accommodation as being limited. However, some participants noted that the Committee would still be able to provide monetary policy accommodation even after lowering the target range for
the federal funds rate to the ELB. In particular, new
forward guidance or balance sheet measures could be introduced.
Participants also indicated strong support for related actions taken by the Board of Governors to support the
credit needs of households and businesses:
•
•
•
•
to lower the primary credit rate by 150 basis
points to ¼ percent and to allow depository institutions to borrow from the discount window
for periods as long as 90 days in order to encourage more active use of the discount window on
the part of depository institutions to meet unexpected funding needs
to encourage depository institutions to utilize intraday credit to support the provision of liquidity
to households and businesses and the smooth
functioning of payment systems
to encourage banks to use their capital and liquidity buffers as they provide loans to households and businesses affected by the coronavirus
and undertake other supportive actions in a safe
and sound manner
to reduce reserve requirements to 0 percent in
light of the shift to an ample-reserves regime and
to support lending to households and businesses
by depository institutions
Participants also indicated support for enhancing, in coordination with the Bank of Canada, the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, the European Central Bank, and
the Swiss National Bank, the provision of liquidity via
the standing U.S. dollar liquidity swap line arrangements.
The pricing on the standing U.S. dollar swap arrangements would be lowered by 25 basis points so that the
new rate would be the U.S. dollar OIS rate plus 25 basis
points, and U.S. dollars would be offered by foreign central banks with an 84-day maturity, in addition to the
1-week maturity operations. Following this discussion,
the Chair indicated that these changes to the standing
U.S. dollar liquidity swap line arrangements would be
implemented consistent with the procedures described
in the Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations.
Participants generally commented that these additional
measures would be helpful in supporting the flow of
credit to households and businesses. A few participants
commented that stigma associated with the discount
window may still be present or that further action, such
as a relaunch of the Term Auction Facility, might be
needed to encourage banks to take up additional funding. A few other participants noted that discount win-
Page 10
Federal Open Market Committee
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
dow stigma should be less of a concern than it was previously. In particular, these participants cited the lowering of the primary credit rate to the top of the target
range for the federal funds rate, offering term funding
for up to 90 days, and regulators encouraging banks to
use the discount window to continue prudently lending
to households and businesses. Several participants commented that banks should be discouraged from repurchasing shares from, or paying dividends to, their equity
holders in the wake of the proposed measures. Participants generally noted that other measures to support the
flow of credit to households and businesses, including
those that relied on section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve
Act, might be needed in such an uncertain and rapidly
evolving environment and that it would be prudent for
the Federal Reserve to develop and remain prepared to
implement such measures.
Committee Policy Action
In their discussion of monetary policy for this meeting,
members noted that the coronavirus outbreak had
harmed communities and disrupted economic activity in
many countries, including the United States, and that
global financial conditions had also been significantly affected. Available economic data showed that the U.S.
economy came into this challenging period on a strong
footing, with a strong labor market, a low unemployment rate, and moderate growth in household spending,
although business fixed investment and exports had remained weak. More recently, the energy sector had
come under stress. On a 12-month basis, overall inflation and inflation for items other than food and energy
were running below 2 percent. Market-based measures
of inflation compensation had declined, and surveybased measures of longer-term inflation expectations
were little changed.
Members judged that the effects of the coronavirus
would weigh on economic activity in the near term and
would pose risks to the economic outlook. In light of
these developments, almost all members agreed to lower
the target range for the federal funds rate to 0 to ¼ percent. These members expected that the target range
would be maintained at this level until they were confident that the economy had weathered recent events and
was on track to achieve the Committee’s maximum employment and price stability goals. One member preferred to lower the target range by 50 basis points, to
½ to ¾ percent, at this meeting, in support of the actions
taken to promote smooth market functioning and the
flow of credit to households and businesses and in light
of the anticipated effects of the coronavirus on eco-
nomic activity and the economic outlook. In this participant’s view, a 50 basis point cut would preserve space
for further cuts in the target range that could be implemented when market conditions had improved enough
to ensure that the monetary policy transmission mechanism was functioning.
Members noted that they would continue to monitor the
implications of incoming information for the economic
outlook, including information related to public health
as well as global developments and muted inflation pressures, and that the Committee would use its tools and
act as appropriate to support the economy. Members
observed that, in determining the timing and size of future adjustments to the stance of monetary policy, the
Committee would assess realized and expected economic conditions relative to its maximum-employment
objective and its symmetric 2 percent inflation objective.
They also agreed that those assessments would take into
account a wide range of information, including measures
of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments.
Members emphasized that the Federal Reserve was prepared to use its full range of tools to support the flow of
credit to households and businesses and thereby promote its maximum-employment and price-stability
goals. To support the smooth functioning of markets
for Treasury securities and agency MBS that are central
to the flow of credit to households and businesses, over
coming months the Committee agreed to increase its
holdings of Treasury securities by at least $500 billion
and its holdings of agency MBS by at least $200 billion.
The Committee also agreed to reinvest all principal payments from the Federal Reserve’s holdings of agency
debt and MBS in agency MBS. In addition, members
noted that the Desk had recently expanded its overnight
and term repo operations. Members indicated that they
would continue to closely monitor market conditions
and that the Committee was prepared to adjust its plans
as appropriate.
At the conclusion of the discussion, the Committee
voted to authorize and direct the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York, until instructed otherwise, to execute
transactions in the SOMA in accordance with the following domestic policy directive:
“Effective March 16, 2020, the Federal Open
Market Committee directs the Desk to undertake open market operations as necessary to
maintain the federal funds rate in a target range
of 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the
Minutes of the Meeting of March 15, 2020
Page 11
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Desk to increase over coming months the System Open Market Account holdings of Treasury securities and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) by at least $500 billion and by at
least $200 billion, respectively. The Committee
instructs the Desk to conduct these purchases
at a pace appropriate to support the smooth
functioning of markets for Treasury securities
and agency MBS.
The Committee also directs the Desk to continue conducting term and overnight repurchase agreement operations to ensure that the
supply of reserves remains ample and to support the smooth functioning of short-term U.S.
dollar funding markets. In addition, the Committee directs the Desk to conduct overnight reverse repurchase operations (and reverse repurchase operations with maturities of more than
one day when necessary to accommodate weekend, holiday, or similar trading conventions) at
an offering rate of 0.00 percent, in amounts limited only by the value of Treasury securities held
outright in the System Open Market Account
that are available for such operations and by a
per-counterparty limit of $30 billion per day.
The Committee directs the Desk to continue
rolling over at auction all principal payments
from the Federal Reserve’s holdings of Treasury
securities and to reinvest all principal payments
from the Federal Reserve’s holdings of agency
debt and agency mortgage-backed securities received during each calendar month in agency
mortgage-backed securities. Small deviations
from these amounts for operational reasons are
acceptable.
The Committee also directs the Desk to engage
in dollar roll and coupon swap transactions as
necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal
Reserve’s agency mortgage-backed securities
transactions.”
The vote also encompassed approval of the statement
below for release at 5:00 p.m.:
“The coronavirus outbreak has harmed communities and disrupted economic activity in
many countries, including the United States.
Global financial conditions have also been significantly affected. Available economic data
show that the U.S. economy came into this challenging period on a strong footing. Information
received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in January indicates that the labor
market remained strong through February and
economic activity rose at a moderate rate. Job
gains have been solid, on average, in recent
months, and the unemployment rate has remained low. Although household spending
rose at a moderate pace, business fixed investment and exports remained weak. More recently, the energy sector has come under stress.
On a 12-month basis, overall inflation and inflation for items other than food and energy are
running below 2 percent.
Market-based
measures of inflation compensation have declined; survey-based measures of longer-term
inflation expectations are little changed.
Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment
and price stability. The effects of the coronavirus will weigh on economic activity in the near
term and pose risks to the economic outlook.
In light of these developments, the Committee
decided to lower the target range for the federal
funds rate to 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee
expects to maintain this target range until it is
confident that the economy has weathered recent events and is on track to achieve its maximum employment and price stability goals.
This action will help support economic activity,
strong labor market conditions, and inflation returning to the Committee’s symmetric 2 percent
objective.
The Committee will continue to monitor the
implications of incoming information for the
economic outlook, including information related to public health, as well as global developments and muted inflation pressures, and will
use its tools and act as appropriate to support
the economy. In determining the timing and
size of future adjustments to the stance of monetary policy, the Committee will assess realized
and expected economic conditions relative to its
maximum employment objective and its symmetric 2 percent inflation objective. This assessment will take into account a wide range of
information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures
and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments.
Page 12
Federal Open Market Committee
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The Federal Reserve is prepared to use its full
range of tools to support the flow of credit to
households and businesses and thereby promote its maximum employment and price stability goals. To support the smooth functioning
of markets for Treasury securities and agency
mortgage-backed securities that are central to
the flow of credit to households and businesses,
over coming months the Committee will increase its holdings of Treasury securities by at
least $500 billion and its holdings of agency
mortgage-backed securities by at least $200 billion. The Committee will also reinvest all principal payments from the Federal Reserve’s holdings of agency debt and agency mortgagebacked securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. In addition, the Open Market Desk has
recently expanded its overnight and term repurchase agreement operations. The Committee
will continue to closely monitor market conditions and is prepared to adjust its plans as appropriate.”
Voting for this action: Jerome H. Powell, John C.
Williams, Michelle W. Bowman, Lael Brainard, Richard
H. Clarida, Patrick Harker, Robert S. Kaplan, Neel
Kashkari, and Randal K. Quarles.
Voting against this action: Loretta J. Mester
President Mester was fully supportive of all of the actions taken to promote the smooth functioning of markets and the flow of credit to households and businesses
but voted against the FOMC action because she preferred to reduce the target range for the federal funds
rate to ½ to ¾ percent at this meeting.
Consistent with the Committee’s decision to lower the
target range for the federal funds rate to 0 to ¼ percent,
the Board of Governors voted unanimously to lower the
interest rate paid on required and excess reserve balances
to 0.10 percent and voted unanimously to approve a
1½ percentage point decrease in the primary credit rate
to 0.25 percent, effective March 16, 2020.
The Board also approved changes to allow Reserve
Banks to extend primary credit loans for as long as
90 days and that could be prepaid or renewed on request. In addition, the Board approved a reduction in
reserve requirement ratios applicable to net transaction
deposits above the exemption threshold to 0 percent effective with the reserve maintenance period beginning
on March 26, 2020.
It was agreed that the next meeting of the Committee
would be held on Tuesday–Wednesday, April 28–
29, 2020. The meeting adjourned at 2:40 p.m. on
March 15, 2020.
Notation Vote
By notation vote completed on February 18, 2020, the
Committee unanimously approved the minutes of the
Committee meeting held on January 28–29, 2020.
Videoconference meeting of March 2
A joint meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee
and the Board of Governors was held by videoconference on March 2, 2020, at 7:30 p.m. to review developments related to the outbreak of the coronavirus and discuss steps that could be taken to provide support to the
economy. As background for the Committee’s discussion, the staff reviewed recent developments in financial
markets and provided an assessment of the evolving
risks to the economic outlook.
The SOMA manager noted that since mid-February
when concerns about the spread of the coronavirus beyond China had begun to intensify, global risk asset
prices and sovereign yields had declined sharply. U.S.
and global equity indexes were lower than at the time of
the Committee’s meeting in January and implied equity
market volatility had risen to levels not seen since 2015.
The deterioration in risk sentiment had also been reflected in a significant widening in U.S. and European
corporate credit spreads and in peripheral European
spreads. Amid the ongoing market volatility, issuance of
investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds and of
leveraged loans had generally dried up. Money markets
had been resilient during the broader financial market
volatility; pricing and trading conditions in offshore U.S.
dollar funding markets had also been stable. Market
functioning had remained orderly despite deterioration
in liquidity conditions in Treasury, equity, and credit
markets.
Financial market participants’ views on the likely course
of U.S. monetary policy had changed since the Committee’s January meeting. The expected path of the federal
funds rate embedded in futures prices had shifted down
significantly over the period. Market commentary had
interpreted Chair Powell’s February 28 statement as indicating the FOMC was prepared to lower the target
range for the federal funds rate at or before the March
meeting to support the achievement of the Committee’s
maximum employment and price stability goals. Expectations for global monetary and fiscal easing had in-
Minutes of the Meeting of March 15, 2020
Page 13
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
creased, with some market commentary noting the possibility of a coordinated effort across central banks or
fiscal authorities.
The SOMA manager noted that the situation remained
highly fluid with key risks, including those associated
with funding for corporate borrowers, operational vulnerabilities associated with the transition to alternative
work arrangements, and the potential for impaired market functioning.
The staff then provided an update on current conditions
and changes to the economic outlook since the FOMC’s
January meeting. Available indicators for China suggested that the spread of the coronavirus had been associated with a collapse in economic activity during the
first quarter, with spillovers to the global economy from
the drop in Chinese demand and disruption of supply
chains. Although there were some tentative signs that
the coronavirus in China was being contained and production was beginning to resume, the outbreak of the
virus in other foreign economies was weighing on consumer and business sentiment and depressing consumption in those countries. All told, foreign economic activity was expected to be significantly weaker during the
first half of 2020 than the staff had anticipated at the
time of the January FOMC meeting.
The staff noted that the spread of the virus was at an
earlier stage in the United States and its effects were not
yet visible in monthly economic indicators, although
there had been some softening in daily sentiment indexes and travel-related transactions. The outlook for
real economic activity over the remainder of the year was
highly uncertain and depended on the spread of the virus
and the measures taken to contain it. Scenarios involving a greater spread of the coronavirus and more severe
social-distancing actions would be associated with a
greater shutdown of production and disruption of supply chains, larger negative effects on consumer and business sentiment, more significant increases in unemployment, and worsening financial conditions. Reductions
in demand, coupled with a stronger U.S. dollar and
weaker commodity prices, were expected to put downward pressure on inflation, with the magnitude of the
softening in core inflation depending on the severity of
the situation.
FOMC participants discussed the significant outbreaks
of the coronavirus that had emerged recently in a few
countries outside China and the likelihood that the virus
would spread widely around the world, including in the
United States. While the economic outlook at the time
of the Committee’s January meeting had been favorable,
the potential spread of the virus and the measures
needed to protect communities from it represented a
material downside risk to the U.S. economy. A forceful
monetary policy action could provide a clear signal to the
public that policymakers recognized the potential economic significance of the situation and were willing to
move decisively to support the achievement of the Committee’s dual mandate goals and counter the recent tightening of financial conditions. Although a reduction in
the policy rate would not slow the spread of infection or
remedy broken supply chains, it could help shore up the
confidence of households, businesses, and financial markets; ease financial strains of consumers and firms; and
provide meaningful support to the economy in the face
of a large shock to demand. Accordingly, participants
supported a reduction of 50 basis points in the target
range for the federal funds rate.
On March 3, 2020, the Committee completed the vote
to authorize and direct the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York, until instructed otherwise, to execute transactions
in the SOMA in accordance with the following domestic
policy directive:
“Effective March 4, 2020, the Federal Open
Market Committee directs the Desk to undertake open market operations as necessary to
maintain the federal funds rate in a target range
of 1 to 1¼ percent. In light of recent and expected increases in the Federal Reserve’s nonreserve liabilities, the Committee directs the
Desk to continue purchasing Treasury bills at
least into the second quarter of 2020 to maintain
over time ample reserve balances at or above
the level that prevailed in early September 2019.
The Committee also directs the Desk to continue conducting term and overnight repurchase agreement operations at least through
April 2020 to ensure that the supply of reserves
remains ample even during periods of sharp increases in non-reserve liabilities, and to mitigate
the risk of money market pressures that could
adversely affect policy implementation. In addition, the Committee directs the Desk to conduct overnight reverse repurchase operations
(and reverse repurchase operations with maturities of more than one day when necessary to
accommodate weekend, holiday, or similar trading conventions) at an offering rate of 1.00 percent, in amounts limited only by the value of
Treasury securities held outright in the System
Open Market Account that are available for
Page 14
Federal Open Market Committee
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
such operations and by a per-counterparty limit
of $30 billion per day.
The Committee directs the Desk to continue
rolling over at auction all principal payments
from the Federal Reserve’s holdings of Treasury
securities and to continue reinvesting all principal payments from the Federal Reserve’s holdings of agency debt and agency mortgagebacked securities received during each calendar
month. Principal payments from agency debt
and agency mortgage-backed securities up to
$20 billion per month will continue to be reinvested in Treasury securities to roughly match
the maturity composition of Treasury securities
outstanding; principal payments in excess of
$20 billion per month will continue to be reinvested in agency mortgage-backed securities.
Small deviations from these amounts for operational reasons are acceptable.
The Committee also directs the Desk to engage
in dollar roll and coupon swap transactions as
necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal
Reserve’s agency mortgage-backed securities
transactions.”
The vote also encompassed approval of the statement
below for release at 10:00 a.m. on March 3, 2020:
“The fundamentals of the U.S. economy remain
strong. However, the coronavirus poses evolv-
ing risks to economic activity. In light of these
risks and in support of achieving its maximum
employment and price stability goals, the Federal Open Market Committee decided today to
lower the target range for the federal funds rate
by ½ percentage point, to 1 to 1¼ percent. The
Committee is closely monitoring developments
and their implications for the economic outlook
and will use its tools and act as appropriate to
support the economy.”
Voting for this action: Jerome H. Powell, John C.
Williams, Michelle W. Bowman, Lael Brainard, Richard
H. Clarida, Patrick Harker, Robert S. Kaplan, Neel
Kashkari, Loretta J. Mester, and Randal K. Quarles.
Consistent with the Committee’s decision to lower the
target range for the federal funds rate to 1 to 1¼ percent, the Board of Governors completed on March 3,
2020, unanimous votes to lower the interest rate paid on
required and excess reserve balances to 1.10 percent and
to approve a ½ percentage point decrease in the primary
credit rate to 1.75 percent, effective March 4, 2020.
_______________________
James A. Clouse
Secretary
Cite this document
Federal Reserve (2020, March 14). FOMC Minutes. Fomc Minutes, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/fomc_minutes_20200315
@misc{wtfs_fomc_minutes_20200315,
author = {Federal Reserve},
title = {FOMC Minutes},
year = {2020},
month = {Mar},
howpublished = {Fomc Minutes, Federal Reserve},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/fomc_minutes_20200315},
note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}