fomc minutes · December 15, 2020

FOMC Minutes

Page 1

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee

December 15–16, 2020

A joint meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee

and the Board of Governors was held by

videoconference on Tuesday, December 15, 2020, at

1:00 p.m. and continued on Wednesday, December 16,

2020, at 9:00 a.m. 1

PRESENT:

Jerome H. Powell, Chair

John C. Williams, Vice Chair

Michelle W. Bowman

Lael Brainard

Richard H. Clarida

Patrick Harker

Robert S. Kaplan

Neel Kashkari

Loretta J. Mester

Randal K. Quarles

Thomas I. Barkin, Raphael W. Bostic, Mary C. Daly,

Charles L. Evans, and Helen E. Mucciolo, 2

Alternate Members of the Federal Open Market

Committee

James Bullard, Esther L. George, and Eric Rosengren,

Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of St.

Louis, Kansas City, and Boston, respectively

James A. Clouse, Secretary

Matthew M. Luecke, Deputy Secretary

Michelle A. Smith, Assistant Secretary

Mark E. Van Der Weide, General Counsel

Michael Held, Deputy General Counsel

Trevor A. Reeve, Economist

Stacey Tevlin, Economist

Beth Anne Wilson, Economist

Shaghil Ahmed, Michael Dotsey, Rochelle M. Edge,

Marc Giannoni, William Wascher, and Mark L.J.

Wright, Associate Economists

Lorie K. Logan, Manager, System Open Market

Account

1 The Federal Open Market Committee is referenced as the

“FOMC” and the “Committee” in these minutes.

2 Elected as an Alternate by the Federal Reserve Bank of New

York, effective November 11, 2020.

Ann E. Misback, 3 Secretary, Office of the Secretary,

Board of Governors

Matthew J. Eichner, 4 Director, Division of Reserve

Bank Operations and Payment Systems, Board of

Governors; Michael S. Gibson, Director, Division

of Supervision and Regulation, Board of

Governors; Andreas Lehnert, Director, Division of

Financial Stability, Board of Governors

Margie Shanks, Deputy Secretary, Office of the

Secretary, Board of Governors

Sally Davies and Brian M. Doyle, Deputy Directors,

Division of International Finance, Board of

Governors; Michael T. Kiley, Deputy Director,

Division of Financial Stability, Board of Governors

Jon Faust, Senior Special Adviser to the Chair, Division

of Board Members, Board of Governors

Joshua Gallin, Special Adviser to the Chair, Division of

Board Members, Board of Governors

William F. Bassett, Antulio N. Bomfim, Wendy E.

Dunn, Burcu Duygan-Bump, Kurt F. Lewis, Ellen

E. Meade, and Chiara Scotti, Special Advisers to

the Board, Division of Board Members, Board of

Governors

Linda Robertson, Assistant to the Board, Division of

Board Members, Board of Governors

Eric M. Engen and John J. Stevens, Senior Associate

Directors, Division of Research and Statistics,

Board of Governors

Jane E. Ihrig, Don H. Kim, and Edward Nelson, Senior

Advisers, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of

Governors; Brett Berger,4 Senior Adviser, Division

of International Finance, Board of Governors

Attended Tuesday’s session only.

Attended through the discussion of developments in financial markets and open market operations.

3

4

Page 2

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Elizabeth K. Kiser, Associate Director, Division of

Research and Statistics, Board of Governors

Eric C. Engstrom, Deputy Associate Director, Division

of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors; Norman

J. Morin, Karen M. Pence, and John M. Roberts,

Deputy Associate Directors, Division of Research

and Statistics, Board of Governors; Jeffrey D.

Walker,4 Deputy Associate Director, Division of

Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems,

Board of Governors

Brian J. Bonis and Dan Li, Assistant Directors,

Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors

Penelope A. Beattie,3 Section Chief, Office of the

Secretary, Board of Governors; Lubomir Petrasek,

Section Chief, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board

of Governors

David H. Small, Project Manager, Division of

Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors

Heather A. Wiggins,4 Group Manager, Division of

Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors

Michele Cavallo and Erin E. Ferris, Principal

Economists, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board

of Governors

Kyungmin Kim4 and Arsenios Skaperdas,4 Senior

Economists, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board

of Governors

Courtney Demartini,4 Lead Financial Institution and

Policy Analyst, Division of Monetary Affairs,

Board of Governors

Randall A. Williams, Lead Information Manager,

Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors

Becky C. Bareford, First Vice President, Federal

Reserve Bank of Richmond

Kartik B. Athreya, Joseph W. Gruber, Sylvain Leduc,

Anna Paulson, Daleep Singh, and Christopher J.

Waller, Executive Vice Presidents, Federal Reserve

Banks of Richmond, Kansas City, San Francisco,

Chicago, New York, and St. Louis, respectively

Todd E. Clark, Senior Vice President, Federal Reserve

Bank of Cleveland

Jonathan P. McCarthy, Matthew Nemeth,4 Giovanni

Olivei, Rania Perry,4 Matthew D. Raskin,4 Jonathan

L. Willis, and Patricia Zobel, Vice Presidents,

Federal Reserve Banks of New York, New York,

Boston, New York, New York, Atlanta, and New

York, respectively

Robert Lerman,4 Assistant Vice President, Federal

Reserve Bank of New York

Lisa Stowe,4 Markets Officer, Federal Reserve Bank of

New York

Developments in Financial Markets and Open

Market Operations

The manager of the System Open Market Account

(SOMA) turned first to a discussion of financial market

developments. Market sentiment improved over the period, as reduced uncertainty related to the U.S. election

and positive vaccine news outweighed the anticipated effect of the ongoing surge in the pandemic. U.S. equity

price indexes reached all-time highs, with the largest

gains registered in sectors that have underperformed

during the pandemic. Corporate credit spreads tightened, most notably among lower-rated firms and in sectors most affected by social distancing measures resulting from the pandemic. Longer-term Treasury yields

rose modestly, driven by increases in inflation compensation. The positive vaccine news also supported risk

sentiment abroad, leading many global equity price indexes to advance and the U.S. dollar to depreciate further.

Market participants had highlighted that uncertainty

nevertheless remained high and had pointed to several

prominent risks to the economic outlook. These risks

included the possibility that the vaccine rollout might

not proceed as smoothly as anticipated, the potential for

adverse developments in negotiations concerning the

United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union, and the potential for deterioration in already

strained sectors, such as those involving small businesses

and certain segments of commercial real estate (CRE).

With regard to market expectations concerning the policy outlook, responses to the Open Market Desk surveys

of dealers and market participants suggested that views

on the most likely timing of the next increase in the target range for the federal funds rate coalesced further

around the first half of 2024. Survey responses continued to indicate median expectations of headline personal

consumption expenditures (PCE) inflation above 2 percent and an unemployment rate of around 4 percent at

Minutes of the Meeting of December 15–16, 2020

Page 3

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

the time of the first increase in the target range for the

federal funds rate. A majority of Desk survey respondents indicated that they expected the Committee to revise its guidance on asset purchases at the current meeting, with many noting that they anticipated the announcement of some form of qualitative, outcomebased guidance tied to inflation, the unemployment rate,

or both. Median Desk survey responses continued to

suggest expectations that purchases would begin to slow

in the first half of 2022 and cease altogether in 2023.

paid for dollar funding crossing year-end generally were

below those observed in recent years. Money market futures also indicated expectations of short-term rates

moving down modestly in coming months, in light of

anticipated further increases in aggregate reserve balances and a moderation in Treasury bill supply. The

manager anticipated that administered rates and the

overnight reverse repo program would be effective tools

for maintaining control of overnight money market

rates.

The size of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet increased

to around $7.3 trillion over the intermeeting period,

driven by growth in securities holdings. The Desk conducted purchases to increase holdings of Treasury securities and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) at

the minimum pace directed by the FOMC, as markets

for these securities continued to function smoothly.

News that CARES Act (Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and

Economic Security Act) funding would not be available

to support new activity in section 13(3) facilities after the

end of the year had only a modest effect on financial

markets. New activity remained limited across most

Federal Reserve funding operations and section 13(3) facilities, although the Municipal Liquidity Facility and the

Main Street Lending Program saw growing usage over

the period, with more take-up expected before their

scheduled year-end termination.

By unanimous vote, the Committee voted to approve a

resolution that extended through September 30, 2021,

the expiration of a temporary repo facility for foreign

and international monetary authorities (FIMA Repo Facility). 5

The manager discussed a proposal to extend the temporary U.S. dollar liquidity swap arrangements as well as

the temporary FIMA (Foreign and International Monetary Authorities) Repo Facility through September 2021.

The path to a complete economic recovery remained uncertain across the globe, particularly for many emerging

market countries, underscoring the need for backstops

that could address potential market stresses and prevent

spillovers from reemerging. Keeping these arrangements in place would contribute to sustaining improvements in global dollar funding markets and to the continued smooth functioning of the U.S. Treasury securities market. Under the proposal, provided that the Committee had no objections, the Chair would approve the

extension of the temporary liquidity swap lines following

the meeting. The extensions of the swap and FIMA repurchase agreement (repo) arrangements would be announced following this meeting.

Staff Review of the Economic Situation

The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures undertaken

to contain its spread continued to affect economic activity in the United States and abroad. The information

available at the time of the December 15–16 meeting

suggested that U.S. real gross domestic product (GDP)

was continuing to recover in the fourth quarter, but at a

more moderate pace than its rapid third-quarter rate, and

that the level of real GDP remained well below its level

at the start of 2020. Labor market conditions improved

further over October and November, although employment continued to be well below its level at the beginning of the year. Consumer price inflation through October—as measured by the 12-month percentage change

in the PCE price index—remained notably below the

rates seen in early 2020.

Market participants generally anticipated calm money

market conditions through year-end, and the premiums

The approved FIMA Desk Resolution, which updates the

July 2020 resolution with a new expiration date, is available

along with other Committee organizational documents at

5

Secretary’s note: The Chair subsequently provided approval to the Desk, following the procedures in the Authorization for Foreign Currency Operations, to extend the expiration of

the temporary U.S. dollar liquidity swap lines

through September 30, 2021.

By unanimous vote, the Committee ratified the Desk’s

domestic transactions over the intermeeting period.

There were no intervention operations in foreign currencies for the System’s account during the intermeeting period.

Total nonfarm payroll employment continued to increase solidly over October and November, though the

rate of monthly job gains was more moderate than the

substantial third-quarter pace. Through November,

https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/rules_authorizations.htm.

Page 4

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

payroll employment had regained somewhat more than

half of the losses seen at the onset of the pandemic. The

unemployment rate moved down further and stood at

6.7 percent in November. The unemployment rates for

African Americans and Hispanics each declined but remained well above the national average. Both the labor

force participation rate and the employment-topopulation ratio in November were above their levels of

two months earlier. The four-week moving average of

initial claims for unemployment insurance was only

slightly lower in early December than it had been in late

October. Weekly estimates of private-sector payrolls

constructed by Federal Reserve Board staff using data

provided by the payroll processor ADP suggested that

the four-week average of private employment gains in

early December was lower than it was in mid-November.

Both the 12-month change in average hourly earnings

for all employees through November and the fourquarter change in total labor compensation per hour in

the business sector through the third quarter continued

to be dominated by changes in the composition of the

workforce. The substantial employment losses over the

past year were most significant among lower-wage workers—a situation that had led to outsized increases in

these average measures of earnings and compensation

that were not indicative of tight labor market conditions.

Total PCE price inflation was 1.2 percent over the

12 months ending in October, and it continued to be

held down by relatively weak aggregate demand and the

declines in consumer energy prices seen earlier in 2020.

Core PCE price inflation, which excludes changes in

consumer energy prices and many consumer food

prices, was 1.4 percent over the same period, while the

trimmed mean measure of 12-month PCE price inflation constructed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

was 1.7 percent in October. In November, the

12-month change in the consumer price index (CPI) was

1.2 percent, while core CPI inflation was 1.6 percent

over the same period. The latest readings on surveybased measures of longer-run inflation expectations

edged up, though each remained within the range in

which it has fluctuated in recent years; in November and

early December, the University of Michigan Surveys of

Consumers measure for the next 5 to 10 years was

slightly above its level in October, while the 3-year-ahead

measure produced by the Federal Reserve Bank of New

York rose a bit in November.

Real PCE rose strongly in October, though at a more

moderate pace than in the third quarter. Real disposable

personal income declined in October, reflecting a large

reduction in government transfer payments, even

though wage and salary income continued to climb. As

a result, the personal saving rate moved lower, though it

continued to be notably above its 2019 average. In November, the components of the nominal retail sales data

used to estimate PCE, along with the rate of light motor

vehicle sales, stepped down, possibly reflecting the effects on consumer spending of renewed socialdistancing measures and concerns about the resurgent

pandemic. Consumer sentiment, as measured by both

the Michigan survey and the Conference Board, moved

somewhat lower, on net, since October, although both

indexes were still above their April troughs.

Housing-sector activity advanced further, on balance, in

October, supported in part by low interest rates. Starts

and construction permits for single-family homes continued to rise, while starts of multi-family units moved

sideways. Sales of existing homes increased solidly,

though new home sales were roughly flat.

Business fixed investment appeared to be expanding further, on net, in the fourth quarter following an outsized

third-quarter increase. Nominal shipments of nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft rose strongly in

October, and new orders for these capital goods continued to advance. By contrast, nominal spending on nonresidential structures outside of the drilling and mining

sector declined further in October. The number of

crude oil and natural gas rigs in operation—an indicator

of business spending on structures in the drilling and

mining sector—continued to move up somewhat

through early December, although the number of rigs in

operation was still subdued, reflecting the effect of low

oil prices on drilling investment.

Industrial production rose strongly over October and

November, led by gains in manufacturing output, but

production was still below its February pre-pandemic

level. The pickup in the production of motor vehicles

and related parts was particularly strong in November.

Output in the mining sector—which includes crude oil

and natural gas drilling and extraction—increased, on

net, over October and November.

Total real government purchases appeared to be declining moderately, on balance, in the fourth quarter. Federal defense spending continued to rise in October and

November, although federal employment declined with

the layoff of temporary census workers. State and local

government payrolls decreased in October and November, and nominal state and local construction expenditures in October were somewhat below their third-quarter level.

Minutes of the Meeting of December 15–16, 2020

Page 5

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

The nominal U.S. international trade deficit widened in

October. Both imports and exports continued to rebound from their collapse in the first half of the year.

Goods imports in October rose above their January level

after several months of strong growth. Goods exports,

however, had only recovered three-fourths of their decline since January despite brisk growth in agricultural

exports. Services trade remained depressed, driven by

the continued suspension of most international travel.

After a strong rebound in the third quarter, foreign economic growth appeared to slow sharply in recent

months. The resurgence of coronavirus infections in

Europe and Canada prompted governments to reintroduce social-distancing restrictions, leading to a fall in

measures of mobility and services activity. Even so, with

restrictions less severe and more targeted than in the

spring, the hit to economic activity looked to be more

limited. Economic growth appeared to hold up better

in several emerging Asian economies. In these economies, effective virus control was supporting domestic

demand, while strong external demand boosted exports.

Inflationary pressures remained subdued in most foreign

economies amid substantial economic slack.

Staff Review of the Financial Situation

Financial market sentiment improved over the intermeeting period, boosted by news of forthcoming

COVID-19 vaccines and reduced uncertainty following

the U.S. election that outweighed concerns regarding the

continued rise in COVID-19 cases and the potential effects of ensuing restrictions. Corporate bond spreads

narrowed, and major global equity price indexes rose on

net. The prospect of additional fiscal stimulus likely

contributed to a steeper U.S. Treasury yield curve, increased inflation compensation, and broad dollar depreciation. Financing conditions for businesses able to access capital markets and households possessing high

credit scores remained accommodative and eased a bit

further in some sectors, but conditions for borrowers

dependent on bank financing remained tight.

Yields on 2-year nominal Treasury securities were little

changed since the November FOMC meeting, while

10- and 30-year yields rose moderately. Market participants attributed the increases in longer-term yields primarily to greater optimism about the economic outlook,

due to the forthcoming availability of effective vaccines

and renewed fiscal stimulus negotiations. Near-dated

option-implied volatility on the 10-year Treasury futures

contract declined to historic lows. The rise in longerterm Treasury yields was concentrated in inflation com-

pensation. The 5-year and 5-to-10-year measures of inflation compensation based on Treasury Inflation Protected Securities rose above their pre-pandemic levels.

The expected path of the federal funds rate, based on a

straight read of overnight index swap rates, remained

close to the effective lower bound through mid-2023.

Survey-based measures indicated that market expectations regarding the federal funds rate target range did not

show a tightening until 2024.

Broad stock price indexes increased over the intermeeting period, led by steep stock price gains in cyclical sectors and buoyed by the prospect of successful vaccines

and lower post-election uncertainty. One-month S&P

500 option-implied volatility—the VIX—declined, reversing a pre-election increase. Consistent with the optimism driving stock prices, spreads of corporate bond

yields over comparable-maturity Treasury yields narrowed markedly across the credit spectrum, most notably for debt securities of the lowest credit quality firms.

Conditions in short-term funding markets remained stable over the intermeeting period. Spreads on commercial paper (CP) and negotiable certificates of deposit

across different tenors were little changed, on net, and

remained around pre-pandemic levels despite continued

outflows from prime money market funds (MMFs) and

the coming year-end. CP issuance was robust over the

intermeeting period across the different tenors. With the

yields of prime MMFs approaching those of government

MMFs, assets under management (AUM) of prime

MMFs declined moderately, while AUM of government

MMFs were little changed. Net yields of prime and government MMFs both remained near historically low levels.

The intermeeting averages of the effective federal funds

rate and the Secured Overnight Financing Rate remained

unchanged from the previous intermeeting period averages, at 9 basis points and 8 basis points, respectively.

Term and forward repo market quotes indicated muted

year-end funding pressure amid ample liquidity conditions. The Federal Reserve maintained its pace of purchases of Treasury securities and agency MBS, and Federal Reserve repos outstanding remained at zero over the

intermeeting period.

Investor sentiment abroad improved over the intermeeting period, as favorable news on COVID-19 vaccines

and the resolution of uncertainty regarding the U.S. election apparently outweighed concerns about another

surge in COVID-19 cases and the resulting adoption of

tighter social-distancing restrictions in many countries.

Page 6

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

On balance, prices of global risky assets increased notably, implied volatility dropped sharply, and the dollar depreciated against most currencies. Most advanced foreign economy sovereign yields were little changed, on

net, as policymakers in several countries announced additional actions aimed at maintaining accommodative financial conditions.

Financing conditions in capital markets continued to be

broadly accommodative, supported by low interest rates

and high equity valuations. With historically low corporate bond yields, gross issuance of both investment- and

speculative-grade bonds remained solid in October.

Much of the recent issuance was intended to refinance

existing debt. Gross institutional leveraged loan issuance increased substantially in October for both new

loans and refinancing. Seasoned equity offerings in October and November were similar to the typical volumes

observed in previous years, though equity raised through

initial public offerings moderated somewhat from the

robust rate of issuance in September. Commercial and

industrial (C&I) loans outstanding on banks’ balance

sheets contracted in October and November, reflecting

the continued paydown of loan balances and the start of

Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness activity.

The credit quality of nonfinancial corporations continued to show signs of stabilization. Although the volume

of nonfinancial corporate bond downgrades outpaced

upgrades somewhat in October and November, nonfinancial corporate bond defaults continued to decline.

The rate of leveraged loan defaults was largely unchanged in October, albeit at somewhat elevated levels.

Market indicators of future default expectations for corporate bonds fell slightly but remained above their prepandemic levels. In the municipal bond market, financing conditions remained accommodative. Issuance of

state and local government debt moderated in November after all-time high issuance in October, and marketbased measures of state credit quality were little changed

on net.

Financing conditions for small businesses remained

tight, although some indicators suggested that they

might have improved a bit. Data provided by the Federal Reserve Small Business Lending Survey showed that

standards for small businesses tightened, on net, over

the third quarter, consistent with the most recent Senior

Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices. Small business loan originations ticked up in October to a level near that seen in the same period last

year. Short-term delinquencies and defaults remained

relatively elevated but significantly lower than the levels

observed following the financial crisis. In light of the

uncertain outlook, small business owners’ assessments

of the risk of permanent closures remained elevated in

most sectors, according to the Census Small Business

Pulse Survey.

In the CRE market, financing conditions remained accommodative, on net, over the intermeeting period.

Agency commercial mortgage-backed security (CMBS)

spreads remained narrow amid strong issuance in October, while non-agency CMBS spreads ticked down.

Triple-B-rated non-agency CMBS spreads came down

substantially from their highs in the spring, although

they remained elevated relative to pre-pandemic levels.

Non-agency issuance picked up in October, nearing prepandemic levels. CRE bank loan growth in October and

November remained weak, consistent with tightened

bank lending standards.

In the residential mortgage market, financing conditions

remained highly accommodative for borrowers accessing government-backed loans. Mortgage rates remained

near historic lows, supporting robust loan originations.

Credit continued to flow to higher-score borrowers who

met standard conforming loan criteria while remaining

tight for lower-score borrowers and for nonstandard

mortgage products. The credit quality of mortgages was

little changed, as the fraction of mortgages in forbearance held fairly steady, and the rate of transition into

mortgage delinquency remained at pre-pandemic levels.

Financing conditions in consumer credit markets remained generally accommodative for borrowers with

relatively strong credit. Credit card balances and average

credit limits on existing accounts contracted, on net, for

all types of borrowers. However, auto loan balances

continued to increase for higher-quality borrowers, and

loan rates remained well below pre-pandemic levels.

Conditions in the asset-backed securities market remained stable over the intermeeting period.

Staff Economic Outlook

In the U.S. economic projection prepared by the staff

for the December FOMC meeting, real GDP growth

was revised up and the unemployment rate revised down

for the fourth quarter relative to the November meeting

forecast. These revisions reflected incoming data that

were, on balance, better than expected, although the recent resurgence of the pandemic and increased socialdistancing restrictions in many states and localities were

expected to weigh on economic activity in the coming

months. As a result, the staff expected that real GDP

growth would temporarily weaken in the first quarter of

2021, and the slowing seen in some of the most recent

Minutes of the Meeting of December 15–16, 2020

Page 7

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

high-frequency indicators of spending and employment

appeared consistent with that forecast. The inflation

forecast for the rest of 2020 was revised down slightly in

response to incoming data, and inflation was projected

to finish the year at a relatively subdued level, reflecting

substantial margins of labor- and product-market slack

in the economy and the large declines in consumer energy prices seen earlier in 2020.

Primarily in response to the recent favorable news on

the development of COVID-19 vaccines, the staff revised up its projection of real GDP growth for 2021 as

a whole, as social-distancing measures were expected to

ease more quickly than previously assumed. With monetary policy assumed to remain highly accommodative,

the staff continued to project that real GDP growth over

the medium term would be well above the rate of potential output growth, leading to a considerable further decline in the unemployment rate. The resulting take-up

of labor- and product-market slack was expected to lead

to gradually increasing inflation, and, for some time in

the years beyond 2023, inflation was projected to overshoot 2 percent by a moderate amount, as monetary policy remained accommodative.

The staff observed that the uncertainty related to the future course of the pandemic, the measures to control it,

and the associated economic effects remained elevated.

In addition, the staff continued to judge the risks to the

economic outlook as being tilted to the downside. The

recent sharp resurgence in the pandemic suggested that

the near-term risks had risen, while the recent favorable

developments regarding vaccines pointed to some reduction in the downside risks over the medium term.

Participants’ Views on Current Conditions and the

Economic Outlook

In conjunction with this FOMC meeting, participants

submitted their projections of the most likely outcomes

for real GDP growth, the unemployment rate, and inflation for each year from 2020 through 2023 and over the

longer run, based on their individual assessments of appropriate monetary policy, including the path of the federal funds rate. The longer-run projections represented

each participant’s assessment of the rate to which each

variable would be expected to converge, over time, under appropriate monetary policy and in the absence of

further shocks to the economy. A Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) was released to the public following the conclusion of the meeting.

Participants noted that the COVID-19 pandemic was

causing tremendous human and economic hardship

across the United States and around the world. Economic activity and employment had continued to recover but remained well below their levels at the beginning of the year. Weaker demand and earlier declines in

oil prices had been holding down consumer price inflation. Overall financial conditions remained accommodative, in part reflecting policy measures to support the

economy and the flow of credit to U.S. households and

businesses. Participants agreed that the path of the

economy would depend on the course of the virus and

that the ongoing public health crisis would continue to

weigh on economic activity, employment, and inflation

in the near term and posed considerable risks to the economic outlook over the medium term.

Participants observed that the economy continued to

show resilience in the face of the pandemic, though it

was still far from having attained conditions consistent

with the Committee’s dual mandate. They noted that

the economic recovery thus far had been stronger than

anticipated—suggesting greater momentum in economic activity than had been previously thought—but

viewed the more recent indicators as signaling that the

pace of recovery had slowed. With the pandemic worsening across the country, the expansion was expected to

slow even further in coming months. Nevertheless, the

positive vaccine news received over the intermeeting period was viewed as favorable for the medium-term economic outlook.

Participants noted that household spending on goods,

especially durables, had been strong. Participants commented that the rebound in consumer spending was due,

in part, to fiscal programs such as federal stimulus payments and expanded unemployment benefits. These

measures had provided essential support to many households. The support to incomes provided by fiscal programs, combined with reduced spending by households

on some services, had contributed to a historically large

increase in aggregate household savings. Participants

also observed that residential investment and home sales

remained robust. Accommodative monetary policy was

viewed as having provided support to interest rate sensitive expenditure categories, including residential investment and consumer durables spending. Participants

regarded the positive news on vaccine development as

further strengthening the medium-term outlook for

household spending. However, participants saw increased challenges for the economy in the coming

months, as the ongoing surge of COVID-19 cases and

the related mandatory and voluntary measures prompted

greater social distancing and damped spending, especially on services requiring in-person contact. Several

Page 8

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

participants pointed out that readings on high-frequency

economic indicators, such as individual mobility indexes

and online restaurant reservation data, might already be

registering the effects of the recent rise in virus cases.

Various participants noted that low-income households

were particularly hard hit by the effects of the resurgent

virus, and that—with the looming expiration of the expanded unemployment benefits, eviction moratoria, and

loan forbearance programs—their situations could deteriorate significantly if additional relief and support did

not materialize.

With respect to the business sector, participants observed that business equipment investment had picked

up further, with strong readings registered on new orders and shipments. A couple of participants remarked

that the very low levels of inventories would likely be a

factor supporting increases in production as demand

continued to recover. Participants noted that the economic recovery had been uneven across firms and industries. Though many business contacts, particularly

those in the durable goods or housing sectors, reported

progress in adapting to the pandemic and improved

business practices, others—especially those closely

linked to the leisure, travel, and hospitality industries—

were still struggling, and their problems were intensifying because of the resurgence of the virus. Furthermore,

while larger firms were generally seen as recovering reasonably well, conditions remained worrisome for small

businesses. A number of participants noted that many

small businesses were in especially vulnerable positions

and that further fiscal policy support would help such

businesses weather the ongoing surge in the pandemic,

especially over the coming months. Looking further

ahead, participants observed that continuing positive developments on the vaccine front could further support

business investment by helping reduce stresses in

pandemic-sensitive industries and by boosting confidence.

Participants remarked that labor market conditions generally had continued to improve, but they were still a

long way from those consistent with the Committee’s

maximum employment goal. Although the pace of employment gains had moderated in recent months, the

overall recovery in employment thus far had been faster

than anticipated, with a little more than half of the

22 million jobs lost over March and April having been

regained. The unemployment rate had declined further,

although several participants underlined the fact that the

labor force participation rate remained below its prepandemic level—likely reflecting, in part, health concerns and additional childcare responsibilities associated

with online schooling. Participants assessed that the ongoing surge in COVID-19 infections would be particularly challenging for the labor market in coming months,

but they indicated that they expected employment to

continue to recover over the medium term. Participants

stressed that the burdens of the economic downturn had

fallen unequally on different groups; in particular, high

rates of job losses had been especially prevalent among

lower-wage workers and among African Americans and

Hispanics. Some participants expressed the concern

that the longer the pandemic continued, the more lasting

damage to the labor market there could be. They noted

that the number of unemployed workers who had been

permanently laid off had increased notably in recent

months and that those workers historically often required a longer time to find a new job than those temporarily laid off. In light of these considerations, several

participants assessed that improvements in the labor

market were lagging that of economic activity, and they

indicated that they had not revised their projections of

labor market variables to the same extent as their revision of the outlook for economic activity.

In their comments about inflation, participants noted

that increases in consumer prices had been soft of late,

as prices of products in those categories most affected

by social distancing—such as hotel accommodations

and air travel—continued to be depressed and increases

in rents remained low. These patterns were expected to

continue in the near term as pandemic concerns intensified over the winter. However, participants generally

saw these downward pressures on inflation starting to

abate next year, with widespread distribution of vaccines

reducing social-distancing concerns and spurring economic activity. A couple of participants suggested that,

as a result of ongoing technology-enabled disruption to

business models and practices or lasting pandemicinduced restraint on firms’ pricing power, downward

pressure on inflation could persist. Several participants

noted a pickup in market-based measures of inflation

compensation. Participants expected that, with continued monetary policy support, inflation would rise over

time. In their SEP submissions, seven participants—

five more than in the September SEP—expected overall

inflation to be above the Committee’s 2 percent longerrun objective in 2023.

Participants noted that overall financial conditions were

accommodative, in part reflecting policy measures to

support the economy and the flow of credit to households and businesses. However, participants underlined

important differences in credit availability across borrowers. Financing conditions eased further for large

Minutes of the Meeting of December 15–16, 2020

Page 9

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

corporations that were able to access capital markets, as

equity prices rose and corporate credit spreads continued to narrow, but smaller firms and some households

reliant on bank lending continued to face tight lending

standards. Participants noted that the financing conditions for small businesses were especially strained, with

a few participants pointing out that a sizable fraction of

small businesses had permanently closed or were in the

process of transitioning to closure. A couple of participants observed that aggregate banking data had not indicated a significant increase in loan delinquencies for

C&I loans thus far, though this development could be

partly due to the CARES Act provisions that provided

relief to many troubled borrowers or to the fact that

many small businesses had gone out of business without

declaring bankruptcy or defaulting on loans. Some participants noted the important role played by the various

section 13(3) facilities implemented in 2020 in serving as

temporary backstops to key credit markets and in helping to restore and maintain the flow of credit to households, businesses, and communities. These participants

also mentioned the announcement that CARES Act

funding to support new activity in many of these facilities would not be available after December 31, and a

number noted that they saw downside risks associated

with this development.

Participants continued to see the uncertainty surrounding the economic outlook as elevated, with the path of

the economy highly dependent on the course of the virus. The positive vaccine news was seen as reducing

downside risks over the medium term, and a number of

participants saw risks to economic activity as more balanced than earlier. Still, participants saw significant uncertainties regarding how quickly the deployment of vaccines would proceed as well as how different members

of the public would respond to the availability of vaccines. Participants cited several downside risks that

could threaten the economic recovery. These risks included the possibility of significant additional fiscal policy support not materializing in a timely manner, the potential for further adverse pandemic developments—

which could lead to more-stringent restrictions, moresevere business failures, and more permanent job

losses—and the chance that trade negotiations between

the United Kingdom and the European Union would

not be concluded successfully before the December 31

deadline. As upside risks, participants mentioned the

prospect that the release of pent-up demand, spurred by

wider-scale vaccinations and easing of social distancing,

could boost spending and bring individuals back to the

labor force more quickly than currently expected as well

as the possibility that fiscal policy developments could

see measures that were larger than expected in amount

or economic impact. Regarding inflation, participants

generally viewed the risks as having become more balanced than they were earlier in the year, though most still

viewed the risks as being weighted to the downside. As

an upside risk to inflation, a few participants noted the

potential for a stronger-than-expected recovery, coupled

with the possible emergence of pandemic-related supply

constraints, to boost inflation.

In their consideration of monetary policy at this meeting,

participants reaffirmed the Federal Reserve’s commitment to using its full range of tools to support the U.S.

economy during this challenging time, thereby promoting the Committee’s statutory goals of maximum employment and price stability. Participants agreed that the

path of the economy would depend significantly on the

course of the virus and that the ongoing public health

crisis would continue to weigh on economic activity, employment, and inflation in the near term. Participants

noted that, with the pandemic worsening across the

country, the expansion would likely slow in coming

months. In contrast, for the medium term, participants

commented that positive vaccine news had improved

the economic outlook. That said, participants agreed

that the path ahead remained highly uncertain and that

the economy remained far from the Committee’s longerrun goals. In light of this assessment, all participants

judged that maintaining an accommodative stance of

monetary policy was essential to foster economic recovery and to achieve an average inflation rate of 2 percent

over time.

All participants supported enhancing the Committee’s

guidance on asset purchases at this meeting and, in particular, adopting qualitative, outcome-based guidance indicating that increases in asset holdings would continue,

with purchases of Treasury securities of at least $80 billion per month and of agency MBS of at least $40 billion

per month, until substantial further progress has been

made toward reaching the Committee’s maximum employment and price stability goals. In their discussions

of this change, participants noted that the new guidance

regarding balance sheet policy brought the statement’s

references to purchases into better alignment with the

Committee’s outcome-based guidance on the federal

funds rate, offered more clarity about the role played by

the asset purchase program in providing accommodation to meet the Committee’s economic goals, and underscored the responsiveness of balance sheet policy to

unanticipated economic developments. A few participants stressed that all of the Committee’s policy tools

Page 10

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

were now well positioned to respond to the evolution of

the economy. For example, if progress toward the Committee’s goals proved slower than anticipated, the new

guidance relayed the Committee’s intention to respond

by increasing monetary policy accommodation through

maintaining the current level of the target range of the

federal funds rate for longer and raising the expected

path of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. A couple of

participants remarked that, against this background, it

was important to convey to the public that the federal

funds rate remained the Committee’s primary policy

tool.

A number of participants discussed considerations related to determining the eventual attainment of “substantial further progress” toward reaching the Committee’s maximum employment and price stability goals.

Participants commented that this judgment would be

broad, qualitative, and not based on specific numerical

criteria or thresholds. Various participants noted the importance of the Committee clearly communicating its assessment of actual and expected progress toward its

longer-run goals well in advance of the time when it

could be judged substantial enough to warrant a change

in the pace of purchases.

Regarding the decisions on the pace and composition of

the Committee’s asset purchases, all participants judged

that it would be appropriate to continue those purchases

at least at the current pace, and nearly all favored maintaining the current composition of purchases, although

a couple of participants indicated that they were open to

weighting purchases of Treasury securities toward

longer maturities. Participants generally judged that the

asset purchase program as structured was providing very

significant policy accommodation. Some participants

noted that the Committee could consider future adjustments to its asset purchases—such as increasing the pace

of securities purchases or weighting purchases of Treasury securities toward those that had longer remaining

maturities—if such adjustments were deemed appropriate to support the attainment of the Committee’s objectives. A few participants underlined the importance of

continuing to evaluate the balance of costs and risks associated with asset purchases against the benefits arising

from purchases.

Participants shared their views on the appropriate evolution of asset purchases once substantial further progress had been made toward the Committee’s maximum

employment and price stability goals. A number of participants noted that, once such progress had been attained, a gradual tapering of purchases could begin and

the process thereafter could generally follow a sequence

similar to the one implemented during the large-scale

purchase program in 2013 and 2014.

Committee Policy Action

In their discussion of monetary policy for this meeting,

members agreed that the COVID-19 pandemic was

causing tremendous human and economic hardship

across the United States and around the world. They

noted that economic activity and employment had continued to recover but remained well below their levels at

the beginning of the year and that weaker demand and

earlier declines in oil prices had been holding down consumer price inflation. Overall financial conditions remained accommodative, in part reflecting policy

measures to support the economy and the flow of credit

to U.S. households and businesses. Members agreed

that the Federal Reserve was committed to using its full

range of tools to support the U.S. economy in this challenging time, thereby promoting its maximum employment and price stability goals. Members also stated that

the path of the economy would depend significantly on

the course of the virus. In addition, members agreed

that the ongoing public health crisis would continue to

weigh on economic activity, employment, and inflation

in the near term and was posing considerable risks to the

economic outlook over the medium term.

All members reaffirmed that, in accordance with the

Committee’s goals to achieve maximum employment

and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run

and with inflation running persistently below this longerrun goal, they would aim to achieve inflation moderately

above 2 percent for some time so that inflation averages

2 percent over time and longer-term inflation expectations remain well anchored at 2 percent. Members expected to maintain an accommodative stance of monetary policy until those outcomes were achieved.

All members agreed to maintain the target range for the

federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent, and they expected

that it would be appropriate to maintain this target range

until labor market conditions had reached levels consistent with the Committee’s assessments of maximum

employment and inflation had risen to 2 percent and was

on track to moderately exceed 2 percent for some time.

In addition, members agreed that it would be appropriate for the Federal Reserve to continue to increase its

holdings of Treasury securities by at least $80 billion per

month and agency MBS by at least $40 billion per month

until substantial further progress had been made toward

the Committee’s maximum employment and price stability goals. They judged that these asset purchases

Minutes of the Meeting of December 15–16, 2020

Page 11

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

would help foster smooth market functioning and accommodative financial conditions, thereby supporting

the flow of credit to households and businesses.

Members agreed that, in assessing the appropriate stance

of monetary policy, they would continue to monitor the

implications of incoming information for the economic

outlook and that they would be prepared to adjust the

stance of monetary policy as appropriate in the event

that risks emerged that could impede the attainment of

the Committee’s goals. Members also agreed that, in assessing the appropriate stance of monetary policy, they

would take into account a wide range of information, including readings on public health, labor market conditions, inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and

financial and international developments.

At the conclusion of the discussion, the Committee

voted to authorize and direct the Federal Reserve Bank

of New York, until instructed otherwise, to execute

transactions in the SOMA in accordance with the following domestic policy directive, for release at 2:00 p.m.:

“Effective December 17, 2020, the Federal

Open Market Committee directs the Desk to:

Undertake open market operations as necessary to maintain the federal funds rate in

a target range of 0 to ¼ percent.

Increase the System Open Market Account holdings of Treasury securities by

$80 billion per month and of agency

mortgage-backed securities (MBS) by

$40 billion per month.

Increase holdings of Treasury securities

and agency MBS by additional amounts

and purchase agency commercial

mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) as

needed to sustain smooth functioning of

markets for these securities.

Conduct term and overnight repurchase

agreement operations to support effective

policy implementation and the smooth

functioning of short-term U.S. dollar

funding markets.

Conduct overnight reverse repurchase

agreement operations at an offering rate of

0.00 percent and with a per-counterparty

limit of $30 billion per day; the per-

The statement approved at the meeting included a drafting

error. By notation vote shortly after the meeting concluded,

6

counterparty limit can be temporarily increased at the discretion of the Chair.

Roll over at auction all principal payments

from the Federal Reserve’s holdings of

Treasury securities and reinvest all principal payments from the Federal Reserve’s

holdings of agency debt and agency MBS

in agency MBS.

Allow modest deviations from stated

amounts for purchases and reinvestments,

if needed for operational reasons.

Engage in dollar roll and coupon swap

transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve’s agency

MBS transactions.”

The vote also encompassed approval of a statement for

release. 6 The following statement was released at

2:00 p.m.:

“The Federal Reserve is committed to using its

full range of tools to support the U.S. economy

in this challenging time, thereby promoting its

maximum employment and price stability goals.

The COVID-19 pandemic is causing tremendous human and economic hardship across the

United States and around the world. Economic

activity and employment have continued to recover but remain well below their levels at the

beginning of the year. Weaker demand and earlier declines in oil prices have been holding

down consumer price inflation. Overall financial conditions remain accommodative, in part

reflecting policy measures to support the economy and the flow of credit to U.S. households

and businesses.

The path of the economy will depend significantly on the course of the virus. The ongoing

public health crisis will continue to weigh on

economic activity, employment, and inflation in

the near term, and poses considerable risks to

the economic outlook over the medium term.

The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent

over the longer run. With inflation running persistently below this longer-run goal, the Committee will aim to achieve inflation moderately

above 2 percent for some time so that inflation

the Committee unanimously approved a corrected version of

the statement for release at 2:00 p.m.

Page 12

Federal Open Market Committee

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

averages 2 percent over time and longer-term

inflation expectations remain well anchored at

2 percent. The Committee expects to maintain

an accommodative stance of monetary policy

until these outcomes are achieved. The Committee decided to keep the target range for the

federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and expects

it will be appropriate to maintain this target

range until labor market conditions have

reached levels consistent with the Committee’s

assessments of maximum employment and inflation has risen to 2 percent and is on track to

moderately exceed 2 percent for some time. In

addition, the Federal Reserve will continue to

increase its holdings of Treasury securities by at

least $80 billion per month and of agency

mortgage-backed securities by at least $40 billion per month until substantial further progress

has been made toward the Committee’s maximum employment and price stability goals.

These asset purchases help foster smooth market functioning and accommodative financial

conditions, thereby supporting the flow of

credit to households and businesses.

In assessing the appropriate stance of monetary

policy, the Committee will continue to monitor

the implications of incoming information for

the economic outlook. The Committee would

be prepared to adjust the stance of monetary

policy as appropriate if risks emerge that could

impede the attainment of the Committee’s

goals. The Committee’s assessments will take

into account a wide range of information, including readings on public health, labor market

conditions, inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and financial and international developments.”

Voting for this action: Jerome H. Powell, John C.

Williams, Michelle W. Bowman, Lael Brainard, Richard

H. Clarida, Patrick Harker, Robert S. Kaplan, Neel

Kashkari, Loretta J. Mester, and Randal K. Quarles.

Voting against this action: None.

Consistent with the Committee’s decision to leave the

target range for the federal funds rate unchanged, the

Board of Governors voted unanimously to leave the interest rates on required and excess reserve balances at

0.10 percent. The Board of Governors also voted unanimously to approve establishment of the primary credit

rate at the existing level of 0.25 percent, effective December 17, 2020.

It was agreed that the next meeting of the Committee

would be held on Tuesday–Wednesday, January 26–

27, 2021. The meeting adjourned at 10:05 a.m. on December 16, 2020.

Notation Vote

By notation vote completed on November 24, 2020, the

Committee unanimously approved the minutes of the

Committee meeting held on November 4–5, 2020.

_______________________

James A. Clouse

Secretary

Cite this document
APA
Federal Reserve (2020, December 15). FOMC Minutes. Fomc Minutes, Federal Reserve. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/fomc_minutes_20201216
BibTeX
@misc{wtfs_fomc_minutes_20201216,
  author = {Federal Reserve},
  title = {FOMC Minutes},
  year = {2020},
  month = {Dec},
  howpublished = {Fomc Minutes, Federal Reserve},
  url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/fomc_minutes_20201216},
  note = {Retrieved via When the Fed Speaks corpus}
}