Exchange Rates and Foreign Direct Investment: A Note
Abstract
In "Exchange Rates and Direct Investment: An Imperfect Capital Markets Approach," Kenneth Froot and Jeremy Stein [1991] develop a new finance-based theory to answer an old question--the relationship, if any, between the flow of foreign direct investment and the exchange rate. Their theory, based on the possibility that a foreign firm's borrowing opportunities for financing a U.S. acquisition may be a function of its net worth in dollars, implies a negative relationship between a dollar appreciation and direct investment inflows into the United States. Empirically, the authors find statistically significant evidence of the implied negative relationship for quarterly and annual time series regressions, over the period 1973-88.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System International Finance Discussion Papers Number 444
April 1993
EXCHANGE RATES AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT: A NOTE
Guy V.G. Stevens
NOTE: International Finance Discussion Papers are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. References in publications to International Finance Discussion Papers (other than an
acknowledgment that the writer has had access to unpublished material) should be cleared with the authors.
ABSTRACT
In "Exchange Rates and Direct Investment: An Imperfect Capital Markets Approach," Kenneth Froot and Jeremy Stein [1991] develop a new finance-based theory to answer an old question -- the relationship, if any, between the flow of foreign direct investment and the exchange rate. Their theory, based on the possibility that a foreign firm’s borrowing opportunities for financing a U.S. acquisition may be a function of its net worth in dollars, implies a negative relationship between a dollar appreciation and direct investment inflows into the United States. Empirically, the authors find statistically significant evidence of the implied negative relationship for quarterly and annual time series regressions, over the period 1973-88.
The major purpose of this note is to show that this empirical support for the theory is weak. The authors’ regressions show evidence of serious instability, and the significant negative relationship between direct investment inflows and the value of the dollar disappears for
important subperiods of the 1973-88 period and for the sample period
extended through 1991.
EXCHANGE RATES AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT: A NOTE
Guy V.G. Stevens*
I. INTRODUCTION
In "Exchange Rates and Direct Investment: An Imperfect Capital Markets Approach," Kenneth Froot and Jeremy Stein [1991] develop a new finance-based theory to answer an old question -- the relationship, if any, between the flow of foreign direct investment and the exchange rate. Their theory, based on the possibility that a foreign firm's borrowing opportunities for financing a U.S. acquisition may be a function of its net worth in dollars, implies a negative relationship between a dollar appreciation and direct investment inflows into the United States. Empirically, the authors find statistically significant evidence of the implied negative relationship for quarterly and annual time series regressions, over the period 1973-1988.
The major purpose of this note is to show that, irrespective of whether this evidence serves to distinguish their theory from its competitors, the empirical support for the theory is weak. The quarterly aggregate regressions show evidence of serious instability inside and outside the 1973-88 sample period, and the significant negative relationship between direct investment inflows and the value of the dollar holds for only part of it. Moreover, when the sample period for the quarterly regression is extended through 1991, the estimated
coefficient on the exchange rate again becomes insignificant. A similar
‘* The author is a senior economist in the Division of International Finance, Federal Reserve Board. His thanks go to Michael Adler and Robert E. Lipsey for helpful comments, to Kenneth Froot and Jeremy Stein for sharing their data, and to Vlad Gutin and Dara Akbarian for skillful research assistance. This paper represents the views of the author and should not be interpreted as reflecting those of the Board of Governors oc members of its staff.
“szoyqne ey} YITA sUOTSSNOSTp UT peTFTAeTO sem qutod STYI /OeTOTIAB UTeQS-QoorA eYyA Jo BuTpeer e WoAZ AeeTO You st (eTqeTIeA quepuedep e423 10F Z:gg6T) 1:8861 2e potaed otduwes ey FO pue oul ‘¢ "Te307 Tenuue ey} Fo UoTIONAASUOD sYA UT pesn seM 4H: [661 AOF OAN3TZ AzeututTTead ey ‘1661 epnyTouT ey, suotsserZe1 Tenuue ey AOZ ‘eaemoy ‘eunf UT SUOTSTAeI ey} e10Jeq peonpoird sem azeqaenb sTyQ AOZ ean3TyF PesTAsr ou “7661 YOARW UT eTqeTTeae eweoeq [661 JO Aeqaenb yAANozZ eyQ A0jZ aan3Tz AzeutwtT{ead e ySnoyate (Zz) ‘([zZ66T] peanw ees) T:Z661T Ut Butq1e3s SseTies ey. UT yve1q & ZUTSNeO ‘pestAol sem ‘eTqeTiea juepuedep oyy JO AOJeLouMU 9YyA ‘QueUIZseAUT JOeATP JO MOTJUT eYyQ JO uoTATUTJOp ey. Z66T sunt UT (T) :Suoseet om} AOF pesn Jou e10eM ¢€:1661 Puckeq eIep ‘9 pue c ‘H suoTsseiZe1 ATAeqIenb oy. Aq “eTqeA ey UT peIsTT asoy. puokeq 19031enb auo ATTeNIOe ST eTQeTIeA Quepuedep eyQ 10x potied etdwes oy. ‘siosseiZe1 ay BuTZZeT uey. AeyyeAr ‘suotsseaZex ATAeQAenb ayA UT eTqeTazaeA uepuedep ey ZuTpeeT Jo eotqoeid ay. peMoT[OJ UTeEIS puUe ooI™ voUTS *z
*sTsoyqoddéy peutejuTew Ateyy Jo Aaoddns uy ATZuTHTAAs sseT yonw ‘snyQ ‘pue PexTU 219M S}[NSe1 esay. aesneoseq AT TAeuTAd -- A pue ‘AT ‘III seTqey ateyy
UT peqjitoder uoToesuez Jo edkq Ao ‘AxQun0d. ‘Aaysnput fq umop ueyoaq ejep [Tenuue 1oOF sq[nsel ,sioy {ne oy} euTWexe Jou sevo0p ejo0u SsTYUL ‘T
osyTe sioyzne ey, *(xepuT WYAW 949) ABT [Op eyQ Jo onTea oyQ 09 ATeaT AeZou
‘queqjiodwt qsow ‘pue puezq out. eyq 09 ATeATATSod :seTqeTizeA om}
02 peqzeler ATQuUeOTFTUSTS ST eTqeTIeA Quepuedep ey ‘potaed etdwes sty
soJ ‘uzeqag pue Aoorg Aq pejaodea sy g reded TBuTZSTAoO aya Jo I eTqQeL UT
peqiodei uotsser3e1 ATAeqAenb Key oyQ se owes oy4 ATTePTIUESSe ST ‘T:8g6T - L:€Z6T potaed owt, eyQ A0oz ‘eTqeq oy UT UoTReNbe AsATZ eUL
‘soTqeTiea Quepuedeput Ateyjo ey ete AdeorequT ue pue puer owt APeUTT
eB {Xepuyt o3e1 eBueyoxe WAIN S,AWI eu Jo BolT TeAnQeu oy. ST eTqeTszea
eel eZueyoxe ey. pue ‘(peqsnf{pe ATTeuosees) Gnd ‘S'n TeuTWoU Aq peptaTp
SAOTJUT QUSTIZSIAUT JOOSTTp TeUTWOU Jo OTIeA |YQ ST eTQGBTIeA QUepuedep ey
seseo [Te ul “I66L J° [Te to 32ed y8norzyQ BuTpueqxe potied etdues
Z‘T AeZuoT e AJozy pue ‘potied eTdues [euTZTA0 eyA Jo sjesqns Aoz AQTTIQGeIs Aejouweied s,uofqjenbe ay, A0F 4803 Ynq ‘WIOF [TeuOTAOUNF UTe3zS-JOOCIY
eyQ jadeooe erzsy pequeseid sq[nsex ayy ‘A109S 9YQ STTEe2 I PTGPL
SLTOSYY AUVAINOD ANOS ‘II
‘suoTSseiZe1 oQe30133e [Tenuue 9yQ AozZ savedde sanjotd
-@-
show that a regression using annual aggregate data leads to the same conclusion (equation 7).
However, equations 2, 3 and 8 in the table illustrate that their key finding is not robust for subsamples within their chosen sample period. For more than half of the initial quarterly sample period, 1973:1 through 1981:4, the value of the dollar is insignificantly related to the direct investment ratio (equation 2); this is also the case for many subsamples ending before 1980, for example 1973:1 to 1977:4 (equation 3). Equation 8 shows a similar picture for the annual data.
The Froot-Stein result is absent, not only for large parts of their original quarterly and annual sample periods, but also for recent history -- 1988:2 through 1991:2 for the quarterly data, and 1988-1991 for the annual. The regression for the quarterly subsample (equation 4) shows a positive, although statistically insignificant, coefficient for the MERM index.“ When the original sample is extended to 1991, the coefficient for the value of the dollar is insignificant for both quarterly and annual regressions (equations 5 and 9). It might be added that this failure of the exchange-rate variable is not the result of seasonal factors or the autocorrelation of the residuals (p) that seems present in equation 5. In fact, standard attempts to correct for these factors in equation 6 further reduce the explanatory power of the exchange rate (insignificant seasonals not reported).
As might be inferred from the above results, formal Chow tests for the most part reject the hypothesis of structural stability for the Frooz-Stein equation for subsamples of the original sample period and for the sample period extended through 1991. In the table, all Chow tests
are based on Froot and Stein's original sample period, quarterly or
4. The annual regression for 1988-91 also shows a positive coefficient, but is not reported here because it only has one degree of freedom.
"JJSUSEAUT JOSATp UO ae eBuRYoXe ey. Jo Joezzo ue ButATduy setrzoeyy eATIBITGATeS snoTzea Jo uoTIeroTdxe ue 1t0z [7661] peseid pue AeTpy 2%eg “9
(*€8T
‘d ‘[9661] AeateH ‘°3°e ‘e0g) ‘potrzed azeqaz0ys ey. AeAO paqeuUtase uot jenbs
ey? JO TPATSIUT UoTIOTperd oyQ UTYITA [Tez potied eTdwes 1zeZuoT eyQ Jo pue 242 Ysnory suCTJeATESGO TeYyIeYM Ssjseq 4seQ MOYO Ae[NoTAIAed styZ ‘c
Aey pue ‘[1661] tequemeq ‘[¢g6t] wemysng ‘[0661] seaeg ‘[166T] SseTAeL pur
AeyTreq &q yA10m Teotsaydwe [njzerzep ‘utTeAg pue Aoorg Jo 3eYyQ WorZ queresjstIp
aaInb sTepow [TeoTJetoeYyA Jo AxeqQuod ey} UT YBnoYyITe -- uoTIeTOeAdde
aqei eSueyoxe owoy e AoF usTS eaTQeZoeu oy. si0aAez opeoep ASeT
e432 TeAo suOp A%I0M TeOTATdWe eYy2 Jo souPTepuoderd oy QeYyQA eQOU 02 ATeF ATUO ST 3T ‘eaoge peuTuexe sq[nsei1 ey. Jo sseuyeem ayQ oqTdseqg
‘petzea sem potied atdues oyQ
useyA eer eSuPyoxe ey} AoZ usTS snonZtqueun ue ‘ueae ‘10 AAT TqQeas moys
02 peTTez uteas pue Joorg Aq pesodoid suotsserZea1 eTduts Area ayQ ueym
au estadins jou ptp at ‘snyy g (Atoaua UuTeIS-QOOTY eyQ 02 peQetezun
I1®) WATZ [TBuoTReureQUT eYyQ Jo senueAeZ puke sysod UOoTIONpord ayQ 09
PpeI2e [eT eq PTNOd eAe1 eBsueyoxe eyQ skem (ZuTAIOTTJUOS 3nq) eTqrsnetd ezem
pewees 37 JeymM Jo stsATeue ue UO peseq eTeM STepow eseyL ‘aAezePYymM USTs
Aue JO eq P[Nod JUeWQSeAUT JOeTTp UO UOTIeENTeASp APT [Op e& Jo AoeFJe sy
2eY2 pemoys Jey. STepow eaTQeUTEQTe eerTYyQ doTevsp 02 [//61] sueAeds UT
peqdwoid sem J ‘SQ/6T e2PT ey. UT Sa[NseAr snon3tque ATAe[TWIs Jo ssneseg
“eTIATT e ATuo ow estadans sj{[nser eroge oy ey. 3TMUpe Asnu { ‘sieek QZ AeAo TOF uo pue FJo pAeASUTA STYI UT perToqe{, sey oYyM oUoauOS sy
SNOILVAYASGO UAHLYNA ‘III
*(sTseyqjoddy upeqs-.oorq eyq 02 ustTs ut aeqtsoddo sf jBYyQ
qUuaTOTFZOOD pojewyqse ue Zuyaey aatdsep) [g-¢€/61 A0JF uoTsseaZe1 [Tenuue aya ‘g uozjenbs AozZ st uofqdeoxe ATuo vyQ ‘!10990q AO TeneT Quaored ¢
ey. 3e peqoefer st AATT}qQeas [eAnqjon1zqs Jo stseyjodky aeyQ ‘potied eTdues
aATQeUIEATe ATeAe ATTeENQAATA oy ¢ PoTzed uostieduos ey se ‘Tenuue
- o-
- 5 -
[1989] supports the hypothesis of a negative sign. However, the
instability and ambiguity of the regression results in Table I, along
with other contradictory findings, Suggest, it seems to me, that the
issue is still open.
7. See also the results of Catherine Mann [1993] for Japanese direct investment into the United States; she finds no significant exchange rate effect for the period 1976-87.
"88T-€8T ‘(LL6T ‘e°TFFO BuTquTzg ueuuteacy "Sn :uoqZuTysem) squeugsn{py ejey asueyoxy Jo szoazF_ eyL ‘*spe ‘Kousems “cy pue enZoy ‘q'q ‘yIePTID ‘G'd UT ,,‘Queumog, ‘*9°a Any ‘sueaegs
"(6861 ‘sserg oSeotyo
jo AQiszeaTugQ :o8eoTyD) ssauaaTzTJedwog [TePuOCTZeUTEeIUL TOF
S@TOTTOd apeal ‘*pe ‘eirqsueey “Y UT «‘C861-6/6T :8998IS peaTtun euq UT QUdUIQSeAUT 2OeITq USTerT0g Fo squeuTuAeqeq seul, ‘UuYyor pAeMpy ‘AeY
‘L£L£-09 ‘(Z66T PUNL) ZL SseuTsng quezing jo Asaing ,‘suoTAoesuUPAL [ePUOTQeUTeQUT ‘S'n, ‘pzreMoH ‘peany
"(€661T BuTWooyAAoJ) asoueuTy pue AeuoW [TPuCTAePUTEeQUL Fo Teurnor ,‘seTAAsnpul SuTanqoejynuey "§'N UT QuewqseAUT JoOeATQ eseueder Jo squeutTMrejeq, ‘"T eUuTAeyQeED ‘uUeW
“(0661 ‘SSe4d LIW :e8ptaqueg) satzag ewty fo stTskTeuy oTAQZeuoUOCD, eyy ‘meapuy ‘Aesarey
“LUZT-T6TT ‘(1661 2eqWeAON) 90T SOTWOUCDg Jo Teurnor AT1977eNd u yoeoiddy sqexzey Teqatdey qoejgrzedwy uy :quewqjseauy 29002TG uzsToe10g pue soqey odueyoxg, ‘UTeqS ‘9 AWerter pue ‘‘y YQoUuUey ‘QooOIg
"7661 Azenuer ‘oZeotyp Fo AATsAsaATuQ ‘oTwTw , gQquewqseaul QoeitTq usTez0qg eaTiq seZueyy oqey oBueyoxy og, ‘°T udrzyQey ‘reqQuemeg
"goe-26z ‘(sg6T Aen) 19 SOTQST2B2$ pure soTMOUODgT Jo meTAeY , ‘eSUASeAUT YO9eATG Fo
[eae] 9yQ pue ‘suoTjeqoedxy ‘yASTY eqeY eZueyoxy Teey, ‘°O PTaeqd ‘uewYsnD
"677-661 ‘(O66T ‘SSeIq AQTSASATUQ AACR
MON :YTOR MON) SQeyTeH “S'n FO uoTAeZTTeuoTAeUAEQUL ey ‘‘*spe
‘uopneT) “d “W pue yosqeipny “Y “qd UT ,‘seIe3g peItun eyA UT Queu}SseAUT O9ATq UBTet04 pue sqUuomWeAoW oQeYy-eSueyoxy, ‘'Y preyoTY ‘saaeg
“LTT-90T ‘(T66T ATIML) 91S $e9%9gS pazTUN ey UT JUeMZSeAUT
usTeIOY :aouaToOSg [TPT20g pur [POTAT[Og Fo AwepPoy uPoTieuy
aya Fo sjyeuuy ays ‘'pe ‘ueTH TeeyoTW ut , ‘Quewqseaul 490e1TC pue AAT[IqeTazeA e2eYy eBueyoxY, ‘SseTAe] *§ e3i100e5 pue ‘f uTAIeW ‘AOTTeg
“C66T Azenuec ‘AQTSA9VATUQ eTqUMTOD ‘ssUTSNg JO [TOOYDS sQenperay ‘oTuTW ,{UTA9S pue Joorg UO suUOTJeUTIMY, ‘peseig AzAeyseyg pue [eeyoTW ‘I9TPV
SHONAAAAAA
- 9 -
“sTeAeT queored [ pue ¢ ayy qe souRdTFTUBTS TeOTYSTIeYS ‘ATaATJOedSeT ‘aqQeOTPUT yy PUB y ‘Seseyquered ut soTzer 4 :S50q0N
meen Ea aaa aii
(2t‘e)a | | | | | | | (297) | (eed J Cee) | | auu8OT 3 =6| zszet | ot | - [ sot [| o8'2 {| @e4° | Z°2T- ans’ | O'%- | Te-ec | 6
i
(9‘9)a | | | | | | | cot) | (ete) | Cet | | sz't | 6o°2t | Q [| - [ 98° [| @t ] oct | s'ss- Jaxgo: | 9° T+ | te-ec | 8 a | | | | | | | cts) | (279) | Cred | | | etcz | eat | - | ot | ost] 62° | 9°24 |wwpe” | weo'et- [| up-ec | Z Viva ‘TVANNv ee | | J] (s*9)| | | J (es*>) | (ste) | (os) | | | ezees | 99 | os’ |] -- | 920° | 9S" | o8° |xx6zoo’ | s90°- | 2:16 - Tec | 2) ae (es‘et)a | | | | | | J (s't) | (9°9) | Cert) | awze'S | owzts’ =| CUuTk CC SCE Ct ot seo’ | ee |g’ sw te00" | It'- | Z:16 - Trea | Ss a | | | | | | } czo) | (ete) | (gt) | | | zzso- | ot | - | set | zeo’ | 2° | eStt- [axezo’- | 6L°+ | 2:16 - z:e¢8 | 4 eee (LT‘Ty) a | | | | | | |} (g0") | (ss°) | Ceo*) | | awiS'9 | Geto’ | ct | - | ee | 620° | co" | ceo" | go000°-{| 2oo'- ss | vi“e - Tie | €
rc
(ee‘sza | | | | | | | (te) | (9°9) | Cee) | | #€6°T | ts6eo° | ee | - {| get | so' | be’ | ez'- [xsov00° | 6S0°+ | ¥:T8 - Tec | z | | | | | | | cere) | (ze) | (ere) | | | eeez> | es | - | set | 90° | 5° Juxtz°t fxxe?00" 448% - | Tee - Trea | T Vivd ATeaLavn MOHD ssa | aa | 9 | wa [| gas | 2 } Noo | Ls] (WaaW) UT | ~oporseg | # | | | | | | | US SFUSTFO FZ FOOD | eTdueg |
4 T < &+ (WHAW)UT & + NOD = OLLVY
dND OL SMOTINI INSWISSANI LOFHIG “S’N dO OLLVaA WOd SKOISSEuDAa I FvL
661e7 L6loPr O67 lp 6EEL'Y 80817 GlECv cl€ev oSGe V LI8e'~ o8leV vree'v 9Elov O8Sc'v c00¢'r LL020'v OLEe'v Gc6e'v S8Ze'r L60E°7 E89e'V O9ZE'p oLly vy 009h'r Oles'y Gc6S'P 8SV9'r7 6cL9'P SOLO" L68S'P LLES'Y Goes Vv O91S'p LolGy 6LLb'P S6rP'P CLLy'yv LOSP'P BElV'Y
O8Ze'rv
(WHSW) NI
0001°9 L€Z0°0 OsrG 2 S9010 OS€e'y OFEL0 OseSy ¢LL00 0090°2 L+80°0 OSVE'E = =—9921'0 069291 889170 O€Ze'ce LL6¢20 Ospy lt OZLPO Os9S°9l <¢9l¢0 OV9l'0e O9lLEO Ocl9le SO6EO Of6S' yl 9Zer'0 OSIZ VL 8P6c'0 06678 9c0E0 OLS6'EL vBZl0 OSZh'le 9260 O9EE'6 L69¢'°0 Olse’el 92000 OFOE'9l 9c0E'O 080°8 9SZE'0 0989'S L880 OV LO'D LvElO OgSe'e 6r600 0200'S 20800 Ocre'S veclO Olce’s LEEl'O 08609 SPELO O&SE8'P 61910 06006 €9¢1°0 0661'S seco 09€Z'1 LZOv!°0 OScE'y SB8Vvo'0 0/607 chcl0 05821 20c1°0 Olv0S SPS00 O99l'E Pp9Sl'O 0'50S°€ L660°0 0080 cO0ll0 (P+) Ida. dND/ICS4
vO a8) 8) LO 9861 vO EO cO LO S86l vo
O6Ee'r O1GZ 1! 99900 Geze'y oOS0SS o6sE0 Licey Ov6cS 69Z10 6cSep O9PL'E IGZ1°0 LLI?@b O8cle ¥S010 6E8l'r O€lZb E6010 ZOler 0962S O2ZI'0 LLI@p OlZEE BrlZO 180? Ossse 9€zl'0 O€6l'p 1286 e?LEL0 €clgv vesee 1ze10 8Z6l'p zeccl I{¢Eel‘o 6I8l'~ €8091 Or90°0 yoo?vr 10¢9% 22900 98re'v 6clEZ? IHrllO vi9c%'ry eSGEl 9€01'0 966e'p c09Z0 Z2r900 Lyley zezol gseoo Q96lE'y 6y960 €0S0°0 8rcey 66460 68700 60ZE'y S68Z0 StiSOO Esler 16660 8szcro'0
€ecZer 2980! 95500 6808r LIZrl 91900 GlOe'y 16961 6rB0'0 osse'r 19800 91800 Glre'y 00280 E5000 90re'v 8l/20 ZSS0°0 96/2 E8280 28100 g0ser 26091 9rS00 99GS¢'p 98650 18010 OS62r 9E8Z'l 69600 Glve'y 1S6Z0 6rzl'0 G8iz¢r 68eS0 z9S00 gescc'v ZvesO €6E0°0 SLOer Eele90 O0z900 O&re'b €20rO O8Pr00 68EE'p E60E0 8sieo0 l6eer LEZE0 2Sz0'0 O8re’p ZGELO- LLEOO lgsey LyceO 91100- L9lb'y ve6c'0- Z8z200 cOer'y 10710 €920°0- Leer'y O961'0 g2clo0
as (3) ae
(WHAW) NT id4 dN5/Id4
XIGN3ddv VLva
LO 8Z6l vo 8) oO
LO SZ6l vo a8) oO LO vZ6l 148) 80) cD LO €Z6l vod 48) oO LO cZ6l vO 8) oO LO LZ6t
FDI/ GNP FDI LN (MERM) 1971 0.3326 367.4 4.8175 1972 0.7809 949.0 4.7433 1973 2.0563 2800.0 4.6570 1974 3.2303 4760.2 4.6792 1975 1.6288 2603.0 4.6694 1976 2.4362 4346.5 4.7189 1977 1.8691 3728.2 4.7143 1978 3.5026 7896.5 4.6247 1979 4.7115 11876.7 4.6027 1980 6.1697 16918.0 4.6052 1981 8.2238 25196.0 4.7236 1982 4.3374 13792.0 4.8343 1983 3.4786 11947.0 4.8905 1984 6.6708 25359.0 4.9670 1985 4.6926 19022.0 5.0062 1986 7.9695 34091.0 4.8072 1987 12.7889 58119.0 4.6808 1988 12.1071 59424.0 4.6211 1989 13.4429 70551.0 4.6634 1990 6.7360 37213.0 4.5961 1991 3.8977 22197.0 4.5921
SOURCES: FDI data, quarterly, 1984:1-1990:4, and annual, 1973-1990: Russell B. Scholl, "The International Investment Position of the United States in 1990," Survey of Current Business (June 1991), Table 1, line 57, pp. 44-49. For quarterly data before 1984:1, earlier issues of the June Survey of Current Business; for quarterly and annual data for 1991 (see also footnote 2, above), Christopher L. Bach, "U.S. International Transactions, Fourth Quarter and Year 1991," Survey of Current Business (March, 1992), Table 1, p.75.
MERM exchange rate data: International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics (February 1992 and earlier issues), line amx for United States (series discontinued after February 1992).
“TSSOZ%
‘O'd ‘uoq3utysem ‘weqsks earosey
Terepey ey JO sxoureacy Jo preog ‘Hz dojg ‘eoueuTy [euoTAeUreqU] Jo UOTSTATG ‘stedeg uoTssnosTq eouruTy [euoT eUreqU] 03 setdoo 103 sjsenber sseippe eseetg
atpeqey] eloueg SeTTTD uetastazyo II uewato) uyor anq{Im
TeuIeM “WW Meripuy
AeupuTT “¢ Yyeroqgeg
AeupuTT “cf yeroqeg
SiequolTg yoorg useyde js
seuo"l “gq seTszey) AOTTON “A WeTTITM
ze3utjZFltq “M'9 reqseaTds Sl9puTyAsUTY “Cf 43790e5
zenbiey outer
ArpueyH “J ptaeg uossoTag “Y TTON soduey) et[nge
oy) TNyoSuo0g
uosTpa “Cf TLPH 3s0mM ‘QC YQouUuey
uTMIT “VY seT3nog
Jpyoso0y yQouusy YOTTD usaney
susaeqsg “9°A Any
(8) aOHLNv
soqey QseteqQUuy esereay ut umtmerzg AQIpiInbty su
seTzzZng [eoTatdwy Ao [eoOTAeAOSYL Mey ATeaTaepToy yata ATddng pue pueweg 3sz0dwy
seqey esueyoxy uo SUOTIBTIOZEN [eA9AeTTgG uPeTOY-‘s'h
:u0omM e4Q Jo AWoUuooY [eOTATTOg asuL
BoTOY UT UOTISZT[eAEqTT 2eyIeW Teatdey pue ‘AoTTog Azeqouow ‘AoT [og eSueyoxy uster0g
usping ssuezeq ey pue ‘AITTTQeqIsUT TePOTATTOd ‘YyQmor9
STSTI9 JINN 0yQ Buting seotrzg seangng TIO epnazy Jo uoTangtaqastq AITTTqQeqorzg Sexe eyQ BuTAeAoDey :e0Reg pue 1eK suinjey-$/Nd UT eTel soueTaey, TeBuoTATpuoD oyQ pue UuOoTIQUeAreRQUI eATESeY [elepey pue yueqsepung AT TeG
stsM[euy [eotatdug uy :sTeqazeg TeuoTIeUuAeQuT Jo Aoueqoedxg oesTT
c66L syeerg [Teanqonizas Jo gouesetg oyq UT sqsej, uoTIeAZeQUTO) AATTTIBTOA e3eyY eZueYyoXY Fo S[epow ewosg Jo uostTiedwoyg peseg AIT[TInN V
edoing urleqSemM ABM-ASOg UT ATEeADDIY oTMOUODY 09 UOTQANGTAqUOD S,LLVD eUuL
qunoossy quezing ey pue syo0ys AQTATIONporg oTJTIeds-AzQUNOD snsieA TeqOTD
OQON YW :QueuqQseAUT qoerTq USTer0g pue soqey eSueyoxy
£66L
SHILIL
siodeg uoTSsnosTd s,oueulty [Leuotzeursquy
- OL -
(A%/]
Cty
77
St?
Lev
8Ev
6€7
T?77
ou
ev?
VATA
ada dWON ddit
IFDP NUMBER
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
424
423
422
421
420
- 11 -
International Finance Discussion Papers TITLES
1992
The Power of Cointegration Tests
The Adequacy of the Data on U.S. International Financial Transactions: A Federal Reserve Perspective
Whom can we trust to run the Fed? Theoretical support for the founders views
Stochastic Behavior of the World Economy under Alternative Policy Regimes
Real Exchange Rates: Measurement and Implications for Predicting U.S. External Imbalances
Central Banks’ Use in East Asia of Money Market Instruments in the Conduct of Monetary Policy
Purchasing Power Parity and Uncovered Interest Rate Parity: The United States 1974 - 1990
Fiscal Implications of the Transition from Planned to Market Economy
Does World Investment Demand Determine U.S. Exports?
The Autonomy of Trade Elasticities: Choice and Consequences
German Unification and the European Monetary
System: A Quantitative Analysis
Taxation and Inflation: A New Explanation for Current Account Balances
AUTHOR(s)
Jeroen J.M. Kremers Neil R. Ericsson Juan J. Dolado
Lois E. Stekler Edwin M. Truman Jon Faust
Joseph E. Gagnon Ralph W. Tryon
Jaime Marquez
Robert F. Emery
Hali J. Edison William R. Melick
R. Sean Craig Catherine L. Mann
Andrew M. Warner
Jaime Marquez
Gwyn Adams Lewis Alexander Joseph Gagnon
Tamim Bayoumi Joseph Gagnon
Cite this document
Guy V.G. Stevens (1993). Exchange Rates and Foreign Direct Investment: A Note (IFDP 1993-444). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, International Finance Discussion Papers. https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/ifdp_1993-444
@techreport{wtfs_ifdp_1993_444,
author = {Guy V.G. Stevens},
title = {Exchange Rates and Foreign Direct Investment: A Note},
type = {International Finance Discussion Papers},
number = {1993-444},
institution = {Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System},
year = {1993},
url = {https://whenthefedspeaks.com/doc/ifdp_1993-444},
abstract = {In "Exchange Rates and Direct Investment: An Imperfect Capital Markets Approach," Kenneth Froot and Jeremy Stein [1991] develop a new finance-based theory to answer an old question--the relationship, if any, between the flow of foreign direct investment and the exchange rate. Their theory, based on the possibility that a foreign firm's borrowing opportunities for financing a U.S. acquisition may be a function of its net worth in dollars, implies a negative relationship between a dollar appreciation and direct investment inflows into the United States. Empirically, the authors find statistically significant evidence of the implied negative relationship for quarterly and annual time series regressions, over the period 1973-88.},
}